@racocn8 Having 2 children doesn't prove she's not a woman.

No need for me to prove anything a simple microscope could THOROUGHLY disclose as a lie. That is science; hard, fundamental science.

Thanks for not wading through all of my drivel. It paid off. Name calling, indictment of motive and self-admitted 'shutting out'. Batting at least 500 here.

Trumper?

She presents her gender as a woman, but having fathered children, she is a biological male. (I doubt she's a gynandromorph.) Every cell in her body has a y-chromosome, and no Barr bodies (inactive x-chromosomes).

@Silver1wun You are a fraud.

@LovinLarge Latest score:

INDICTMENT OF MOTIVE - 1
SHUTTING-OUT - 1
NAME CALLING/DEMONIZING - 2
REASONING - 0

@racocn8 I don't know Rachel Levine. Wikipedia uses the pronouns "her" and "she" throughout the entry and says she has 2 children. The onus to prove her male is on the one making the claim, and the proof has to relevant to the time the claim is being made, namely now.

@Silver1wun

Times you've proven your factual claims = 0

@LovinLarge Factual claims are not in need of proving, but possibly disproving. Wikipedia can call him she all it cares to.

I, in fact, out of politeness and respect for her gender role change would address her as that. I have no objection to anyone improving their life experience, happiness and happiness of others by doing whatever they are able to adjust identity and lifestyle.

It only harms others when their personal notion becomes something to impersonally mandate or legally compel others to accept. That is when they invite not so polite resistance.

So, after fathering two children, then choosing to present herself as a woman, she is now a biological woman? The two children are the proof she is a biological male presenting herself as a woman. Perhaps she has had surgery to present herself as a female, though that can only ever be superficially.

@racocn8 I don't know. I haven't made any claims about her, I have only asked for the claims others have made about her to be substantiated. But they weren't, not even the alleged quote.

There is a reason people don't substantiate their claims, because their claims are false. People who don't substantiate their factual claims have no credibility here or anywhere else.

@LovinLarge Silly, Random and Fun is the room/page category here. Had I posted it in the polotical category it would have suggested that it be taken as a serious assertion and quotation and not a.. and, um, not a, a joke.

Yes, it illustrates an attitude and ridicules on account of the attitude but IT'S A JOKE. Again, fanatics have ZERO sense of humor.

@Silver1wun It uses quotation marks. It is therefore asserted to be a quotation. "Jokes" made at the expense of another are not funny. You are a fraud.

@LovinLarge And you are a cornucopia of illustrative 'largesse' for which I am deeply grateful. I don't need this much assistance, but it's the thought that counts. Thank you again.