The question "Do/es someone believe in god(s)?" is kind of missing the point. Wouldn't a better question be to ask "Do you need a god(s)?" I mean if you don't need one then you're done. If you do need one no amount of facts are going to change your mind.
Are you in need of [Law assignment writing service ](htt[newassignmenthelp.co.uk]? New assignment Help offers the best help and support to students looking for professional assistance with their assignments. They are very experienced in working on legal documents, ranging from simple essays to complicated research papers. Our experienced team of lawyers is here to help you every step of the way with your homework or school projects. Whether you need a [HND Assignment Help](http[newassignmenthelp.co.uk] or a little extra help with a difficult concept, They can provide it.
I think the word "need" is not correct in this instance. People can't choose what to believe, so need would be irrelevant in this context. Either you can believe in god or you can't, but your needs can't change that.
The religious crazies claim that god wakes them up in the morning and they are so thankful for this. Apparently your body does not know what to do if god is not there pulling the strings.
Why accept the claims made in all the textbooks about science when you can refer to the single book known as the Buy Bull?
My bladder knows - it's real.
God is like an addictive drug. It is a psychological prop for those who cannot face the realities of life.
And they cannot accept the realities of death. It's difficult to conceive of one's own mortality.
Definitely an "opiate for the masses." AA uses god way too much which is why I suggest SMART for addicts.