Had to share this with my Agnostic friends.
Source; [prri.org]
Sorry but I don't understand this graph at first glance. I'll try again later, maybe.
All three of those metrics are based on false assumptions.
Considering that half of society actually is female then it would stand to reason that a significant portion of society is feminine. What "soft" means is utterly ambiguous. Soft as in easy? Fewer people die these days of war, starvation, and disease... so does that mean we're "too soft"? Isn't one of the goals of progress and technology to make our lives easier?
Those questions are totally loaded. Is society "too soft" lol.
Sort of went over statistics and surveys many years ago and being totally neutral and unbiased in what is being asked was key. Questions like those are examples of what not to do in framing questions. Eg "Society as a whole has become too soft and feminine"...........what exactly is being asked here? Insinuates that being feminine equates being soft, whatever tf "soft" means.
Fascinating, is this a Pew Research Study?
No. It was conducted by PRRi, Public Religion Research Institute: [en.wikipedia.org]
@anglophone thank you for linking your reference source!