Agnostic.com

9 16

Explaining why atheists almost never have many notable persons who follow them because of their non-beliefs...

snytiger6 9 Dec 16
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

9 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

4

I'm pretty GD real then. 🙂

3

That's because most people are too weak, stupid, or cowardly to accept reality, so instead, they choose the fake people and fake ideas....

That is one perspective, here is another...
Many people have been hurt, used, abused, rejected, lost. Looking for acceptance and a sense of belonging, they are susceptible to manipulations that promise to give them the care, acceptance, a home, and the support they crave.

We all have a history, a story, and until that is understood then...who am I to judge?

@Betty That makes sense too, tho it does sort of overlap with my theory, in that both of those same groups of people, involve being dependent and vulnerable, so they are easy prey for manipulation. And I guess I have never been that desperate and alone, that I would sell out and give up my values and morality, just to have those things from a group, but no one can ever truly know themselves, until they've been tempted and tested, same as it is with having power...

@TomMcGiverin I agree. There are many combinations of personalities and their reactions..., needs, wants, and desires are moulded by their life experiences, acquired knowledge and social circles. There is a spectrum with a range that includes both positive and negative, cognitively, psychologically, and emotionally that will determine the extent of vulnerability to manipulation.

There has always been a percentage of the population susceptible to manipulation, extortion, and coercion and opportunists can spot them a mile away.

@Betty Yup, and both demagogue pols like Trump and charlatan preachers, can spot them a mile away.

1

Mao ZeDong

2

And the way I prefer it. 🙂

Betty Level 8 Dec 16, 2023
4

I ave a very small circle of friends and most of them are relatives. I do see a woman in public sometimes that I know is fascinated with me, but she is religious and does not know me. She seems to have a great personality but the religion thing would make it impossible.

2

Karly Marx has many followers

7

Shouldn't it be "The more real you are"? I truly have never heard anyone use the word realer....

Realer is a totally cromulent and embiggened word.

What I looked up says "realer" is incorrect.

One-syllable adjectives

The reason "stricter diets" is better is that for one-syllable adjectives like strict, the comparative is formed by adding –er, rather than with the word more. This is why it is correct to say, “She is older than her brother,” and incorrect to say, “*She is more old than her brother.”

Of course there are exceptions to this rule. For example, the comparative forms for the one-syllable adjectives real, right, and wrong are more real, more right, and more wrong (not realer, righter, or *wronger ). And the adjectives good, bad, and far have the irregular comparative forms better, worse, and farther/further.

6

"Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true."
-- The Buddha

2

My circle is a period…..🤠

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:740103
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.