Finally. Found this, a sober version of the Trump case. Basically it was a weak case with dubious motivation ... but Trump's defense was ludicrously bad and resulted in his conviction. So it's not the slam dunk for justice and the rule of law the Dems are claiming, nor is it the total kangaroo court sham Trump is claiming. Somewhere in the muddy middle:
The best — and worst — criticisms of Trump’s conviction
Was Trump wrongly convicted? The debate, explained. [vox.com]
1
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
5 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.Facts: he used money earmarked for something else by law to try to hush up his moral lapse. Period.
His defense was "ludicrously bad" because he/his lawyers had nothing to say, the Facts spoke for themselves.
annewimsey500
Level 7
June 8, 2024
0
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Related Groups More
Progressives, Socialists, and Black/Palestinian Lives Matter
2457 members
Trump Pinata
1141 members
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.