Be brutally honest. This is purely to satisfy curiosity. There will be no judgment. As this is a question for woman, male responses will be ignored or deleted.
I want to get a consensus on the opinion on the importance one holds and/or the level of attraction one feels towards a man who doesn't earn a weekly paycheck; either through owning his own business, being a freelancer, working in the gig economy, or being between jobs.
Poll is for convenience if you don't wish to comment.
My answer feels shallow but it’s honest. I spent over 20 years being married to someone who earned way less than he should. He wouldn’t ask for a raise nor would he do anything to improve our situation.
And yes, I did all those things. I don’t expect a man to take care of me financially but I also know the pressure of living paycheck to paycheck
@Donotbelieve thank you
you want brutal honesty? okay. i am not sure why you are excluding men when there are certainly men who date men, and considering that at any rate a man might have the same considerations about a woman. i am not sure why you consider being between jobs, often a euphemism for being unemployed, as having a steady paycheck. i am not sure why if it's just dating one needs to worry about such things at all; dating isn't marriage. furthermore, if a woman is attracted (your term) to a man with money, then she is attracted to the money. what's that got to do with the man?
g
Thank you for saying what I thought.
To answer you questions: 1. Men who date other men make up a very small demographic. The state with the largest amount of LGBT in the population is California with 4.8%, which means that men who date men make up only a portion of that.
2. Being between jobs. We live in an ever-changing economy with an unprecedented amount of uncertainty with added complications due to the growing trend of automation. In the gig economy, being between gigs isn't being unemployed...however it depends upon one's definition/one's opinion of what unemployed means. The term unemployed may not apply to a situation of someone taking a month off to prepare for a new position. etc.
3. "i am not sure why if it's just dating one needs to worry about such things at all; dating isn't marriage.":
You might be surprised to know that there are some people here who view dating as a pathway to marriage, and if marriage isn't the end goal, then the point of dating is moot. -Not everyone views things that way, but rest assured there are differing opinions on what dating means or its intended purpose.
4. If a man is attracted to a woman because she has large breasts, long legs, a rapier's wit, then according to the logic you employed he's attracted to those things and not the woman herself. So what does having desirable and attractive attributes have to do with the woman? -The same as money, muscle, confidence, a chiseled jawline, social influence, sense of humor, height, etc have to do with a man. They are attributes of belonging to the person which one might find attractive. In the context of dating/finding a potential mate, they're a foot-in-the-door. Definitely not to be viewed as the whole of a person's potential.
Thank you for your honesty. I hope I've helped to answer your questions.
I wouldn't date a man no matter how much money he has.
Good to know?
I believe it has more with being responsible than the weekly paycheck. If you are in a profession which is seasonal, a gig, freelance, etc but you plan for upcoming bills & even have an emergency fund set up that is one thing. If you are a a lazy bum, claim you are waiting for the next 'job' and just wanting to mooch off someone - I have zero time for you.
As others have said - I can more than support myself and have no plans to support anyone else (been there, done that and will not do it again).
I can support myself on my income. But that's it. And somebody old enough that I would want to date them really should have their own income by then anyway.
The flip side of that would be all those girls/women who have minimum wage jobs with no apparent hope for anything better. Should a guy date them?
Given that we haven't had a matriachal society since the rise of the industrial age, and their important contribution to a household wasn't traditionally monetary (minus the last 30 years), I figured I'd save this question for after the revolution and all men are tagged and locked in cages for the benefit of all mankind.
I dated a guy once who was 'between jobs'. We dated for about four months, and during that time he didn't have any transportation either (he hit another vehicle while driving in the snow). He also would bring his laundry over every weekend to wash since he didn't have a washer and dryer at his place. I was basically his taxi. It didn't pan out, especially after he was able to get some new wheels (from his father), then I started hearing less from him. It turns out he was really only using me. I don't know if he ever found another job, but at least he's not doing his laundry anymore at my house.
Definitely not. I don't care if he doesn't buy me anything, but he should have a job. It helps if he's financially responsible.
Well, he is 5'8 ...or so !!! (whatever that means)... what can you lose?????
@IamNobody I didn’t even notice that lol
I don't want a man sponging off me, or expecting me to support him. It's a deal-breaker.
What if he didn't need/or want to be supported?
Hmm. Interesting. I think if I found the right man and he was pursuing a dream I might be okay with it. He would have to be a hell of a man tho! Hopefully it would work out in the long run.