The problem withn Philosophy is that thare are no ways to verify anything. The result is a lot of Sophistry. Science is a discipline that combines observation, review and repetition. It is the best tool we have to arrive at the truth

Science is the best path for truth. IMHO

All of them.

If you want to find objective truth, apply logic and math into scientific learning.
If you want to find subjective truth (about yourself), apply inner reflection, art, and philosophy with careful filtering through psychology and the other objective truths.

There are many interlinking streams towards whichever you seek, but there are far more ready to carry you away.

"Know thyself" and know the world.

Science is a methodology shared by those studying many different observable and theoretical phenomena. Math is a language of symbology and the means of expression of the relationships among many abstract concepts. Art is a means of expressing a representation of a variety of aspects of subjective and objective observations. Philosophy is a way to take an organized and structured approach to explaining the essence of reality. So the answer to your question is... Yes!

Well I think all of them are good but you can't miss out nature in this either. its amazing to watch. I love watching it from insects to plants to elephants. how everything has its place and reasen to be here.

"Truth" is a woolly abstract concept. Ask yourself a specific question as clearly as possible. And then answer it if you can, using common sense.

Literally, the scientific method is defined as a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. It is the process of seeking the truth.

One does not find truth; truth was never lost.

The best path to truth would be either philosophy or science, bc though nothing is truly certain in life, those two options give people answers that would typically not be answerable

schmarth

Ignorance is bliss

Math

Where there is life there is a pattern, and where there is a pattern there is mathematics. Once that germ of rationality and order exists to turn a chaos into a cosmos, then so does mathematics. There could not be a non-mathematical Universe containing living observers.
John D. Barrow, The Artful Universe (1995)

Science, since this is the only one that can actually be tested to find out if something is 'true'. Art and philosophy are subjective, so cannot determine what is 'true'. This is not to say they do not have value of course, just that their value is different and is in the eye of the beholder.

As a side note, have you ever been to the Tate Modern? The 'art' in there is bloody hilarious. There was one piece that was part of an air duct. I thought it was actually part of the air conditioning system that was being replaced, but no, apparently this is what passes for art nowadays ?

Science in the conventional sense of truth not the Jordan Petterson version or new age edition of it.

Physics and philospohy.

I think it is all of the above, each in its own way

There is no truth, only temporary 'ahah's...combine them all, and you have the drive forward. Isolate any, and you have stagnation.

The path of actually doing it, what you find interesting, what you can pursue with passion. Learning sure, but It is in the actual doing, that you will suceed or fail, which is where I think all truth lies.

MATHEMATICS CANNOT LIE, whereas everything else is either based on scientificc evidence, or theory

Go to you nearest Vulcan and ask if they will school you in logical algorithms.

Logic can lead you to truth - but you must have an open mind

We should say the journey.
The philosopher goes I think therefore I am ala Decarte.
A scientist who is an artist like Leornado Da Vinci goes I think you'll find you are because of this heart inside you that beats.
Further scientist goes I think you'll find your brain is the reason you are and eventuallyh get to things called neurons.
Eventually observations leads to an undersanding of the behaviour of neurons. Though this is true of most science I'd say series of observations leading to a hypothesis of behaviour that is tested repeatedly until someone goes I think maybe we've got this it actually works to you prove us wrong again.

Back to original brain a mathematical model is built of the brain which enables emulation in say a computer and aha thinking.

I'd go with the end point mathematics. Einsteins, Newtons thought experiments invariable ended with something than be measured and mathematically tested.