Okay

I don't quite understand your comment. What is true is something which can be confirmed using logical evidence.

In the event that there is no evidence we have the Schrodinger's cat analogy where the statement is both true and false until prove otherwise. This theory is currently both true and false until we prove it otherwise. True is just a matter of perspective.

That is actually false. As the universe expands, photons travelling across space also expand. Their wavelength increases however their velocity "c" remains constant. As velocity equals the product of frequency and wavelength, as the wavelength increases the frequency decreases. Therefore using E=hf for energy of a photon, we can prove that as time goes on photons become less energetic. At least following a logical method we can theories this.

I know it breaks the law of E=mc^2 but Einstein is the be all and end all of science. He may have been wrong. If we investigate it more we may find out much more with regards to the universe than we knew initially.

I agree. As the old saying goes. The more you come to know, the more you realise how much you don't know. My mum loved quoting that one.

It's not a "magical computer". The computer was an analogy. I'm just theorizing that if we get an output i.e. the big bang, then we must have needed an input to destabilize the 4 fundamental forces. If the logic of input -> process -> output is wrong then nothing in the universe would work.