@ToolGuy
Just saying....You asked for thoughts and I think you should have been more specific in your OP.
That has to go a long way before its a vaccine and she has not been proven to have been vaccinated yet, if she can be at all.
"The first person to receive the Trial Vaccine" is what you should have said.

@ToolGuy I'd hazard a guess here and say she has ONLY had a normal Flu Vaccine.

@ToolGuy Still smells as fishy to me as a Fish Market in Bangkok, shit, they've only just unraveled the genome and nucleitide strings of the virus in the last 3-4 weeks, Australian Labs at both the C.S.I.R.O. and the C.S.L. plus numerous other Labs elsewhere have working 24/7 on researching, etc, the virus and creating a vaccine since approx. 2 weeks AFTER the virus escaped from the Wuhan/Hubei region of China and now the U.S. want us to believe that they've created, tested and are running human Trials already, pull the other leg mate, it plays Jingle Bells.
It may be a throw-back' to my days and years as a nurse but I do keep very much up to date with all things medical still.

@ToolGuy He wants an explanation that your link does not provide.

@JustAskMe Yes, and that as well thank you.

@ToolGuy I see by your profile that your education went as far as Grad School, presumably that is something similar to what we, here in Australia, classify as Secondary/High School, nice bitvof education but may one ask why you haven't gone on further since you are now retired?

@ToolGuy I'm not sure what this response relates to.

@ToolGuy We call such schools Universities over here and I started doing Uni courses in 1998 with a year off when my 15 y.o. daughter was diagnosed with Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma but have continued on ever since.

@ToolGuy sigh . . .

It is hard not-to-notice that you haven't addressed my "IIUC" and other 'claims', and have not answered the question(s) that I asked !

I'm saying AGAIN, it seems no CT has gone-into your choice of credible, reliable sources, and you have NOT taken responsibility for that.

MY words -- ". . . which is why I and others should be wary and question them, and not shift responsibility for whatever "needle in a haystack" "pile of crap" "truthiness" is linked-to."

I try to avoid the 'asking "prove/proof", because (apart from math) not even science does that (sometimes disproves).

I do agree with the expression "burden of proof", which, falls on the entity MAKING the claim(s) (i.e. the "fashion focused city guide" ) and you choosing to post it, not the questioning of it. Disagree with that, if you want/can.

Otherwise, can you explain why you post from sources that don't seem to have reason(s) to assign reliability/credibility to whatever they put on their BLOG/aggregation/website(s). Without that, it seems reasonable for CT to continue to question sources.

@ToolGuy MORE of my words that you have not responded to :

"Do you really think FB (or any website) bears NO responsibility for all the 'fake news' that is shown on their platform, or do you really want to argue "the responsibility is on someone else" ? Aren't there websites (say, for example, journalists) who have, over time, shown credibility/reliability MORE than, say, a freaking BLOG."

@ToolGuy I don't take responsibility for the ignorance (I did not use the "stupid" word) of others. I don't avoid responding to legitimate/sincere questions/requests for clarification from others.

. . . in case these are what you call 'jargon'

IIUC -- If I Understand Correctly
CT -- Critical Thinking

@ToolGuy LOL, nice dodge, Toolguy. ... I can now dismiss your link and information entirely.

@ToolGuy what she was given was not a vaccine.

@ToolGuy whatever happened to being normal because you were middle class and most people were middle class? Wealth Inequality