(The problems with nuclear energy is waste that remains dangerous for over 100,000 years, and that it is only profitable when it is subsidized by the government.)
A prominent Stanford University professor has outlined a roadmap for the United States to meet its total energy needs using 100% wind, water and solar by 2050.
Mark Jacobson, a Stanford professor of civil and environmental engineering and the director of its Atmosphere/Energy Program, has been promoting the idea of all renewable energy as the best way forward for more than a decade. His latest calculations toward this ambitious goal were recently published in the scientific journal Renewable Energy.
“Subsidized by the government” = “subsidized by taxpayers” = not profitable = socialistic.
Until Jacobson visits and learns from [aureon.ca] he is uninformed.
There's always going to be nuclear waste, radioactive materials have countless medical and industrial uses. Not building nuclear power plants isn't going to make much of a dent in that waste pile, so it's no reason to forgo nuclear. Anything that gets us away from fossil fuels is a good thing.
@Druvius A new company is taking us away from fossil fuels.
Visit them at [aureon.ca] and take a look.
It’s very technical and not a two minute task. What do you think?