Your question shows you don't understand the nature of science. Science is NOT a belief system. Science exists whether or not you believe in it. Science is fact. Science is testing. Science is learning through making mistakes. Science is proven to the best of our ability. Science is everything. Science doesnt care about your confidence level. Science doesnt change because you are more or less confident in it.

Science, more specifically the scientific method, is great.. It's only flaw, humanity.

I am very confident in the scientific method. When there are unanswered questions, science isn't afraid to say, we just don't know. Sometimes something is not completely validated and scientists say that current evidence points us toward this conclusion and folks jump on it because it's still under question. So what? They're working on it.

It is reasonable to have a high degree of confidence in science, particularly the hard sciences. The soft sciences not so much, though even there, when proper methodology is applied, the results are basically reliable. So, plain straight answer: Yes.

Science is one tool in a tool belt. When used appropriately it is invaluable. However, it is not, as some people may claim, a naturally progressing unbiased thing. People's perspectives and money are unfortunate realities even in science.

There is only one science but it has many branches: biology, chemistry, physics, geology, etc. Science is both a process for investigating nature and all the knowledge that has accumulated through the exercise of that process over the last 400-odd years. We have a lot of confidence in the validity of the information that has been gathered because the process requires that it all be supported by independently-verifiable evidence, and both the process and its products are constantly subjected to peer review. The process has a built-in self-correction mechanism. Mistakes are made, but rarely do they go very long without being detected and set right. Science is not ideological, nor are its conclusions based on personal desire, caprice, or religious dogma. Belief is right out. Wars are fought over political ideologies and religious dogmas, but no war has ever been fought over scientific findings. The reason for the difference is that religious believers have only ancient texts in which many wild, half-baked, ambiguous and conflicting claims are made. Since the ancient texts are up for interpretation, and there is no way to substantiate any particular opinion, religious believers have no final arbiter that can peacefully settle disputes. Hence the long and bloody history of religious warfare. Meanwhile science, like the ugly duckling that grew into a beautiful swann, serenely glides on down the lake.

Science is science. This is absolute. If something less than a valid wants to pose as a science, well, it isn't a science. Certainly, there are some sciences we understand better than others, but remember that science is a process of coming to better understand where we are coming up short.

Did you mean to say the "scientific method?"

Science information itself is constantly changing; what is a universally accepted "fact" one year might be obsolete the next. Remember when medical doctors endorsed "healthy cigarettes?"

Right now Big Pharm and Big Oil are desperately trying to discredit any renewable health and energy sources, trying to keep cannabis and hemp off the market, but next year they'll be trying to sell their own toxic, synthetic versions of natural cannabis.

Love it! Always questions to gain better understanding. What's not to like?

Science is a method, a way of finding truth, and it's the best one we have, so yeah, I kinda like it.

My favorite quote.

“… Science is constantly proved all the time. You see if we take something like any fiction, any holy book… and destroyed it, in a thousand years’ time, that wouldn’t come back just as it was. Whereas if we took every science book, and every fact, and destroyed them all, in a thousand years they’d all be back because all the same tests would [produce] the same result.”
― Ricky Gervais

I appreciate the fact that we live in a modern world mostly created by science.

Science is my faith.

Science is great. Always learning, always growing.

Very confident but as with anything, I like to read in depth about the evidence supporting whatever is being offered . Also, peer review is Paramount to acceptance.

I'm not quite sure what you mean by your question. I am an engineer. If I ignore principles designed using science, my stuff doesn't work. Do I think this means science knows all? Of course not, science says we always keep testing, but that doesn't mean we accept things we already know to be false because "It is just a theory".

This person is posting all over this site in a feeble effort to sow doubt about science, yet his very questions show a complete lack of understanding of how science works....methinks I smell Troll?!

The so-called 'soft sciences' concern me, as they sometimes appear to resort to methodologies that skirt the edges of objectivity. These sciences include behavioral psychology, anthropology and sociology.

Cryptozoology is my favorite but I think it’s kinda farcical.

I don't believe in the metaphysics

To a point. I like to know who is funding the research if possible...

Christian Science.

If you feel there is something it's not valid then either you know too much about it or just the opposite.