Agnostic.com

19 2

Is it safe to assume that all Americans by now have read or at least heard about the piece in the Guardian referencing President Trump's mushroom-shaped tiny penis?

Did they go too far? Whether you support Trump or not, do you think it was appropriate for them to post this article? Why or why not?

[theguardian.com]

fidla 6 Sep 19
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

19 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

I don't care about Cheeto. As far as I'm concerned, he should get a taste of his own medicine. Of course, he doesn't like it, but what can you expect from a manbaby?

2

Paybacks are a b**** the man is an absolute Pig and he said horrible things about so many people especially women that I don't have a problem with it at all

1

I hadn't heard until now. I thought she made a pretty good case for the story. No one has ever lowered the bar like the pussy-grabber-in-chief. I especially liked:

Much has been written about Daniels’s refusal to be shamed. But what is really remarkable about her is how she’s turned the whole narrative around. Not only will she not be humiliated – she will humiliate him. And why not, damn it? She wasn’t the married one. She is not the one with the power to ruin women’s lives by banning global abortion funding and defunding Planned Parenthood while having bragged in the past how, when you’re a star, you can grab women “by the pussy”. He is. While we may well live in a post-shame era, Daniels knows how to hurt Trump. And given how much Trump is hurting women, I think this is one instance in which we can indulge in some guiltless body-shaming. Go get him, Stormy.

gearl Level 7 Sep 19, 2018
3

His own twitter has lowered the bar so far down for what is acceptable that I'm not sure anything is off limits with this administration.

0

I don’t want to know about his mushroom penis or Clinton’s curvature. Genitals are as unique as fingerprints and shouldn’t be judged against each other.

UUNJ Level 8 Sep 19, 2018
0

This is what I hate about PC. Things like this are acceptable to print but only about right wing figures like Trump or Pauline Hanson in Australia. They do receive very personal attacks which are all giggles on the left leaning types.
But use the same language against an icon of the left and holy shit! You are accused of being scum of the Earth. Big dou me standard.
Eg if this was about Obama's mushroom dick then it would be racist etc etc and people would be losing their minds.
All for calling Trump a sleazy turd, but should be able to use the same language for all.
Seems if targeting the right then it's open season but when targeting the left must be PC, this is what's socially acceptable.

1

If my interest in Trump's genitals was turned into gasoline, it wouldn't drive an ant's motorcycle halfway around the inside of a Cheerio. So no, haven't heard of it and couldn't care less.

2

The same guy who complains about hit pieces coordinated years of attacks with David Pecker of the National Inquirer; left himself NO wiggle room. Deserves 0 sympathy

1

Somehow I managed to miss this.

2

ive had NPR on almost all day and only just now heard of this. The bed that you make, that is the one you got to lie in,

3

The Orange Sphincter deserves to be treated how he treats women, Muslims, immigrants, minorities, gay and disabled people.

1

Probably it was an exaggeration to call his penis "tiny."

mkw Level 1 Sep 19, 2018
3

No it's not too far, mini-mushroom-dick-mussolini set the bar a long time ago. Spew poison long enough you're going to get some on you. Good for the the Guardian.

3

Under the circumstances - not too far at all. He's sure been dishing it out - let him take some !

2

he can only sue them if it's not true. he cannot sue them for invasion of privacy because he is a public figure. but to prove it's not true he would have to unveil his junk.

did they go too far, regardless of legal status? i don't know. is anyone actually forced to read the guardian?

g

2

The final paragraph of the article says all that needs to be said.

Jnei Level 8 Sep 19, 2018
1

The National Enquirer from the 1970's would be a paragon of Journalistic ethics and class today.

BD66 Level 7 Sep 19, 2018
1

YES. All Trump does is threaten minorities, insult women and mock their bodies, so GOOD on Stormy!

1

Well.....
If Melania had any doubt I guess that is over.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:182683
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.