Agnostic.com

17 5

WARNING! Not for snowflakes, Leftists, Intollerant Nuveau "Liberals" or Republicans unable to remove the 2X4's...

Silver1wun 7 Dec 21
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

17 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

Just lovely, except where is the actual evidence that chump is working for "free"? Where does the salary actually go, if so?

Thanks

He doesn't. A president's $400,000 a year salary is absolute chump change when you consider that his businesses are pulling in millions from his presidency. [theatlantic.com]

To think that he is being generous for donating his salary, is about the same as calling Al Capone generous because he tipped his shoe shine boy a quarter just before he robbed the kid's bank account.

@chucklesIII I like the way you think!

2

Difficult to grasp the Democrats as being the crybabies after eight years of "Show me the birth certificate!". Better get used to it, cupcake. We will never accept the treasonous orangutan and his beloved poorly educated.

The last thing I expect is to persuade any 'we's'. That would be a waste of time and so would persuading those who are blind followers already. The goal is to disclose to those without partisan blinders that rejecting theology and gods is only a step toward independence.

When they are shown the level of sycophantic groupism and fearful clinging to ignorance on the part of other atheists, it helps them to understand how, as I like to put it, our overseers have more than one home and that there is no functional difference between political and theological fanaticism..

Asinine, defensive and highly emotional responses to satire and humor are one of the best ways to show them those parallels. Thank you and the other 'we's'! Couldn't do it without you. 😉

@Silver1wun More projection. Keep watching Faux news, the only "news" source required by law to use the tag "For Entertainment Purposes Only".

2

I recommend less projection and more introspection.

Marz Level 7 Dec 22, 2018

Good advice to those who can understand and follow it.

0

I know it isn't meant that way, but it shakes out that way in spite of it. Most of the comments here really are consistent with the category title 'Silly, Random and Fun'; fun to read, that is.

It really is impressive! The hysterical nature of so many comments reminds me of how back-woods Baptists or Holy Rolling Pentecostals react to audacious ideas like 'there is no god'. Because they aren't equipped to respond with something intelligent, they quote scripture and call names. They condemn out of fear that doubt will send them to Hell or that Heaven doesn't really exist and they're wasting their time.

Yes! It's just as funny when displayed by programmed sycophants with the same kinds of fear panic inside and call names and ridicule and like their ignorant cousins laugh because they aren't equipped to respond with something intelligent. In this case, that it's under a category dedicated to silliness makes the responses all the more funny. 😉 Lack of humor by itself is a superb indication of deficient intellect without the group-think and Stockholm Syndrome response from captive minds.

That y'all deeply identify with your captors is on display and true to the title, silly, random and funny. 🙂

This may help in the future when posting satire.

The first rule of comedy: Know your audience

However based on your title it was obvious you just wanted to stir the pot. I expected so when I read the post. It's not a bad way to go btw. You will receive much more negative feedback than just posting safe topics. However any reply is a good reply for you in the points scheme of things. You used key words to get under your audience's skin (ex. Lack of intelligence, group think, Pentecostal). Which was smart move on your part. You're not going win an argument, or make friends, that way but you will get a few points based on upset users who respond to you. Then again you may just actually think your post wasn't going to be seen negatively. I doubt it though, I assume you are smarter than that. Either way here are your points for someone replying to you.

@McWalsoft Thanks for the kind contribution. I've been participating here for about a year and if I was chasing points my level would have been above this long ago. I can afford $20 for a t-shirt.

My motives for stirring are to stir alright, but not as one might think of as the end game. It's actually not. It is both fun, like poking sticks at 'Bedlam' and an illustrative aid. To those targeted by ridicule or satirical barbs now and then it is taken as simply trolling and annoying. To those sharing whatever perspective is represented it is hilarity.

Persuasion isn't necessary for the 'choir' nor is it possible among the faithful of the object. Others read these posts and many more than partisans might think, are seeking new perspectives. We all share pasts anchored in this or that 'ism'; usually just a part of early indoctrination. Rejecting one ism is only a step on the path to freedom. We instinctively seek both group and individual identity, but they kill the latter as soon as possible; creating a semi-conscious secondary craving for security in groups that infects our intellect.

Disclosing functional parallels via illustration opens eyes, not of the blind, but of the seeking. DaVinci classified people in three categories that are very accurate. "Those who see; those who see when they are shown and those who do not see." Comedy is but one way to 'be shown'. Compared to others it is more pleasurable.

Fanatics who blindly agree with or oppose with boundless emotion are like a punch line to those with open eyes AND they are both funny and revealing to the non-affiliated; to the free. Without them
it would only be laughter at the post.

@McWalsoft As an addition to this; lest I be categorized.. It's just as much fun poking sticks from the Left and watching the limited pasture stampede on the Right. One of my favorites is the criminal Zionist state. It takes dark humor...

0

Good one.

2

OK, I only got to the third day of Xmas. What a bunch of pure bullshit. shameless, GOP bubblism! @Silverlwum, go finish your beer already, yr a sucker-of-the-minute.

godef Level 7 Dec 22, 2018

I only got to the first. "A president that works for free"? Are they really that fucking stupid?

I prefer wine. Oh, and I'm not a 'they'. Hard for members of herds to conceive of a congregation of one.. No biggie, I don't expect it.

2

And this:

LMAO I got through all 12 days of that!

4

More like this:

0

No matter how large the room, there is never enough space to fit fanaticism and humor.

Projection much?

Hey Kermit, yr a total denier. Go watch some more Fox, yr useless.

1

p.s. just more proof that this site houses more than people who don't believe in god because it's irrational, but people mad at god, people who are bigoted against religious people, people who don't care one way or another about god but need a platform for their rants and then there are just the idiots

lerlo Level 8 Dec 21, 2018
5

If you can read, look up the Emoluments Clause and then think twice about anyone working for free...then look at the "grabbing by the pussy" recording regarding your guy and assaults...or tear gassing children if you prefer that kind of assault...and since you don't appear to want anyone qualified for your presidency (Hillary most qualified ever since no one has spent 8 years in the white house, been secretary of state AND a senator) check out the opinion our allies have of him, not to mention the lies he tells daily...and oh by the way he was going to be too busy working to play golf...yes and I know you didn't want anyone with a clue watching it but I'm just tired of the idiot and the idiots who follow him

lerlo Level 8 Dec 21, 2018
1

Uh Ohhhh.... Don't say you weren't warned. 🙂

Ya know, that's a really unintelligent and empty response. You are the one with his panties In a bunch, The rest of us are laughing at your dumb posts.Go suck the Don's dick already.

1

A president who works for free. When? Maybe that one time.

When the song begins with number 5, at number 1 the headline says he will be paid $1 yet the song says he's working for free. lol Being paid $1 is not working for free, silly song.

But he has been donating his salary. Seems like all of 2017 and at least the first 2 quarters of 2018
[politifact.com]

@joeymf86 Maybe it is some strategy to use later when he is in big trouble with lawsuits. He can claim he never took the money to start with. Then he can invent some fictitious names that can be used. Wait. This happened before!

2

It should be, a president who golfs for free.

1

Numbers 5 and 8 actually kinda warned the cockles of my heart. Yep

1

Funny, I love it.

1

The Daily Caller, huh?
Yeah, okay.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:249176
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.