Um - wow.... phew. Some one is off a bit.

I think perhaps you suggesting she maybe shouldn't have blocked set off the misogyny trigger ie "Don't you tell me how to think!". Even when she was obviously looking for someone to talk to about the experience she had just had.

Apparently what she wanted was commiseration and agreement and not actual discourse.

Sometimes people do that. (All people actually). It can be a bad day - or it can be a pattern of behavior. You just can't know. (Sometimes the world has gotten on your very last nerve and than social media is the outlet for the hostility because at least no one can 'cough' on your here).

Feel free to block her if she bothered you though. Might be easiest.

I tend to block people at the point at which they say "Fuck off" to me - or say it often enough to other people that I figure I"m next. I don't treat people that way and don't expect it to come my way.
And yet people are still shocked as shit that I have a block list? lol

Update

I've been blocked.

She decided to block without response.

. . . thought I would post this as a comment rather that a reply . . .
. . . this is PMs 'after the fact' of my being 'ousted' by (one of the group) moderator I referred to below

Her : "This is not verbatim from my post, but your comment was off-topic, unnecessar​y, critical and rude. The friendly exchange of ideas and opinions on different topics is appreciated."

Me : ""I try hard not to offend; I try harder not to be offended." -- Navy SEAL veteran and congressma​n Dan Crenshaw. Since when is Critical Thinking off-topic on this non-believer website ? CT is different from criticism. Is there an objective criteria for this group for 'friendly' and 'rude', or is it arbitrary ? Since any individual​ can block another, why resort to group removal without warning ? Does that abide by website guidelines ? "

Her : "Oh, did I fail to mention the argumentat​ive nature of your post? "

Me : "It is hard not to notice your use of the pejorative​. Critical thinkers are open and receptive to all ideas and arguments, even those with which they may disagree."

Her : "Some people enjoy arguement and criticism of others, and I am not one"

Me : "If someone criticises a source, that NEED NOT be taken personally. How do you imagine CT happening without 'argument' (in the ameliorative sense) ? IMO, the alternative is censorship (despite what 'lipstick' might be put-on it). CT is not (personal) criticism."

(You Please leave any commentary you'd like on this strange exchange.

It was strange from the beginning, to me and clear she was looking for agreement with her view that would justify blocking anyone. I think she proved that. Always wondered if the mean girls in school stay that way. That is what shevremindedvme of, nonsubstance just her own drama
It would be great if she learned something from your exchange. Doubt it.

Is that the member by the name of @dead?

Sounds like her.. She blocked me already and I thought I was being nice although I did disagree with her

Sounds like you need to block her.

There are two possibilities here, IMHO:

1. She’s always in ready-for-a-fight mode and wasn’t going to end the conversation with you until she got what she wanted — a fight, which she precipitated.

2. She’s on edge and took your opinion personally about not blocking.

Either way, assuming your retelling is accurate, you said nothing to warrant her reaction.

No you are not a misogynist from what I have read in your post. Sounds like she does not want to debate but just vent. I had someone who told me I must have been abused as a child and was venting my pain because I disagreed with them. And they are one of the people that commented on your post here. So NO, you are not a Misogynist and I'm not a victim of Abuse. lol

Sounds to me like she thinks that is a human right to not be offended. That kind of thinking makes it very hard to make progress in society and have conversations that matter.

Once she blocks somebody, it's s done deal. She's a neurotic. Why should she care? She could always unblock him to read the thread and block him again. If she had approached me with this. I'd have told her to do that. If she persisted I'd block her. I don't have time for nutcases. You're not a misogynist btw and you should block her.

I would consider her misogynist comment as ad hominem.

I have had similar experience(s), two resulting in my removal from group (one was rescinded after the moderator was persuaded to just block me). In both cases, I was engaging in (what I consider to be) Critical Thinking, which was labeled as 'rude' and off-topic ! How CT considered off-topic on a non-believer website is very odd to me.

I agree with "hear the voices of everyone", I have not blocked anyone.

. . . sigh

Wow! I wouldn't even bother replying to her anymore.. .

I don't know whether or not you're a misogynist. it sounds like a kind of wasting your time thinking about this members disagreeable Behavior. maybe just move on?