Agnostic.com

10 12

Let me see if I've got this straight. Children who are abused so badly they die financially benefit society but aborting an unborn baby is a bad thing for society....unless of course an unborn baby is born then as a child dies after suffering horrible abuse then it's all good.

As an added bonus he says "every child is made in the image of God." Thanks for the scientific knowledge, pal.

[newsweek.com]

FvckY0u 8 Feb 22
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

10 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

3

The problem is not just value judgments of who is "worthy of life", but also is how societal views can be manipulated so that the focus isn't really on issues like the U.S. federal minimum wage is less than half what a living wage would be, or how poverty is the best predictive variable of who will develop a mental illness, or that the U.S. is pretty much the only first world country that doesn't consider access to health care to be a human right.

The rich want the poor to have lots of kids, so they stay poor, and also so they have a larger pool of low skilled workers who keep wages down. However, once they are out of the womb, then it is theri own fault for having been born poor, and all responsibility falls on the parents who have to work several jobs each in order to make ends meet.

It's a really twisted and irrational ideology.

0

No you don't have it right. Try again.

What. @FuckYou is simply giving a synopsis of what a republican congressman stated. So, seems you agree with letting little kids suffer. Not your problem now is it?

@Beowulfsfriend What you read into what I typed is YOUR problem not mine. Get better comprehension skills, then reply.

@Alienbeing No it is your problem. I taught first year college writing and you need to be fuckung clear. And we all know you don't give a piss shit about those people you see as inferior; so not giving a shit about other people's kids wouldn't bother you. Your other comments have shown that you don't give a fuck about the masses of people in general. Tell me that you care..... honestly, go ahead. Do it, sincerely. You really don't have it in you.

@Beowulfsfriend You are joke. I am very satisified with y writing skills. In fact when I was working the President of my company (a very big company) frequently asked me to write letters for him because he liked my writing. By the way he had a B.S. from Michigan, and a J.D. from NYU.

As far as what "we all know", you apparently don't know much. I care what others think, and if I think they are wrong I say so.

Do I care about the masses in general? That question is FAR too general to answer. The answer would depend on the issue.and that has NOTHING to do with writing skills does it?

The fact is you read into my post what you wanted to read into it.

@Alienbeing So, you can't say you care. I read your post saying to the poster he doesn't have it right. No explanation as to why. Cry some more crocodile tears from your hurt butt. Yep, I'm a joke, reading into your poorly written and unexplained post, especially after you avoid explaining it after you have the chance to do so. You, on the other hand, are a sicker, old bastard than I am.

@Beowulfsfriend Your acceptance of my writing skiils are not required, so I dismiss your comment.

Now let's address your obviously poor reading comprehension skills. I said "That question is FAR too general to answer". That CLEARLY says, be more specific. It CLEARLY does not mean I won't answer it.

Last, I doubt anyone is sicker or more of an old bastard than you are.

Be specific, maybe you can learn something that way.

@Alienbeing I agree that being thing specific is a good point. Too bad you aren't when you post. And, maybe you are misreading your own post because it never says, at least on my feed, "That question is FAR too general to answer." You said, "No you don't have it right. Try again." To which, I simply said the OP was just stating what a republican congressman said and you freaked out.
That's enough for now. Done with this feed.
BTW, you never did say that you care about children beyond your own brood. I know that being a deplorable old bastard that I shouldn't care either. However, asshole conservatives who not only act hypocritically and damage the health and welfare of kids does piss me off, especially since there is little that I can do. Every once in a while I can give one some shit and attempt to show them their assholeness or uncaring attitude.

@Beowulfsfriend Your continued inability to understand what yu read continues to be your problem.

If you scroll up to my reply to you of 3/2, then read the third paragraph, second sentence, you will see what I referred to.

BTW you aare truly hard headed. Ask a specific question if you want an answer, otherwise, get lost!

5

So we have a man making claims about the horrors of abortion. He's a man. How in the hell would he know? Looks to me like he is just another guy wanting to control women and also control their bodies. His god wanted women incubators. He is likely so stupid that he thinks women use abortion as birth control. I know some idiots who actually believe that.

5

A child born to parents who do not want to be parents will get abused and if the child does get help by the abuse being reported to child services, the cost to tax payers is higher than paying for contraception or allowing a fetus to be aborted before it grows to be a baby and child with a hell of a life with abusive parents.

Think also of the money saved in welfare services as well, for single mothers who choose not to marry an abusive baby daddy or had no choice but to give birth instead of following their career path. This guy needs to look at the bigger picture.

@FvckY0u I won't argue at all about him already knowing those things and possibly being evil. He is definitely a misogynist and enjoys the idea of controlling women.

0

“Lawmakers were shown a study indicating each incident of fatal child abuse costs society $1.5 million, a figure reached by assessing the impact of trauma and the child's loss of earnings over a lifetime.”

Does the same twisted logic hold true for aborted children?

I enjoy germinating seeds and then I chop them up when they start sprouting because I’m too irresponsible and it’s too much trouble and it’s too expensive for me to grow them into plants. But I enjoy sprouting those seeds.

What an article, glad I read it (sarcasm). Newsweek and the politician are mindless sensationalists. This is what crappy journalism and crappy politics look like.

But look at all money those irresponsible plants will contribute to the economy. All those poor starving attorneys, social workers and law enforcement personnel won’t have anything to do without them. After all according to their macabre accounting methods we are losing billions by not abusing and killing those children. Using this assault on humanity in this way speaks volumes about Newsweek and the illustrious politician.

1

So what alcohol-pill related delusion is he on? I mean drugs are bad for society that's why people suffering in pain for the rest of their life can join in the horrifying abuse-good for society?

5

This cocksucker claims to be pro-life. He also participates in January 6th insurrection. He's a real steaming pile of 💩

2

So if you do all of the "math" in his proposition, you end up with an answer showing that his view is equal to the square root of -1. or is it just part of the set to which Pi belongs (irrational numbers)?

6

He has also claimed rural Alaskan women get pregnant for the purpose of getting an abortion because they get a trip to Anchorage.

10

Fuck. That. Guy.

I love how well you simplify your answers. True compliment.

@Beowulfsfriend Awww, shucks.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:710971
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.