Agnostic.com

7 8

Shouldn't a Justice of the Supreme Court know the law and observe ethical standards?
[theguardian.com]

Flyingsaucesir 8 Apr 20
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

7 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Shouldn't the president and his son?

2

Judges are only human - but some are more human than others. ... and the longer they hold office the more prone to "human" failings they become.
Governments are elected for fixed terms with national elections being held at regular intervals to try to prevent individual members of congress becoming too "human". (Not always successfully, unfortunately)
Surely, Supreme court judges should also be required to apply for re-appointment. Since there are nine members of SCOTUS, perhaps they need to be reconfirmed in sequence, one per year, giving a maximum of 9 years between confirmations (or otherwise).

The idea is that different branches of govt. have different systems of employment. Thus a better form of check and balance might be achieved. eg, US Congress is elected on a 2-year cycle whilst the Senate is 6 years. The idea behind a lifetime appointment is that it can remove a large incentive for party political bias. Many that would have been political lap dogs have found their teeth when freed from the election cycle. One only has to look to all the ex-Torys that have decried the present and former front bench from the Lords. Similarly, I seriously doubt if right-leaning SCOTUS members would have had the guts to rule against Trump's election bs if they had to face re-election. We know that the Senate and House sure didn't.

3

In a real democracy, yes. In America? Erhhh

4

you'd think......

5

He rapidly moved up rank on my 'if I could magically eliminate 10 people' list.

4

Dumb as he is, he knew taking bribes was illegal. You only hide what you believe you need to.

Getting caught in a cover up is never a good look, is it? 😂

nothing remain hiding forever.....

7

I lost all respect for him after he compared criticism of him during his approval hearings as a "lynching."

Yup, he pulled the race card, called the questioning a "high-tech lynching." I thought at the time that the questioning was perfectly appropriate. Anita Hill was a very credible witness. In my opinion, Thomas's nomination should never have been confirmed.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:720374
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.