Agnostic.com

16 8

Question...

Is belief in a deity/s genetic or conditioned?

Betty 8 June 19
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

16 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Bananas have 50% of human dna and they like to cluster together so I'd say it's a coin toss.

This question should really be on your go fund me site, not here amongst infidels who pay scant attention to cognitive scientists trying to turn a trick or two.

1

It has been postulated that there is a god "gene," but even if there is, I think it is mostly conditioning.

The " gene " could affect certain personalities more than others, making them more susceptible to influence.

In my opinion, conditioning, culture, fear, and substandard education have had the biggest success.

@Betty agreed. I stayed in the church largely because I was conditioned to believe in hell. As an adult, I used to look at the transfixed faces about me and could not feel whatever they were feeling.

2

The question of whether belief in a deity is genetic or conditioned is a complex and fiercely debated topic. Belief in a deity can be influenced by a combination of genetic, environmental, cultural, and social factors. Certain studies suggest that there may be genetic predispositions that make some individuals more likely to believe in a higher power than others, while some argue that belief in a deity is primarily shaped by cultural and environmental influences.

Ultimately, the formation of beliefs, including beliefs in a deity, is likely a complex interplay of varying factors which differ from individual to individual.

I agree. It is unique to the individual. It is the common factor I was curious to get your opinion on.

3

Most people are conditioned using fear as a child to believe in a religion and very few ever get past that... Others which probably includes 40% of the world's population are low IQ and therefore more susceptible to fear based conditioning in later years.

Low IQs are not only genetic but also come from a lack of education so the answer to your question is both yes and no...

I agree that people with a lower IQ are more easily influenced. There are different kinds of education. A formal education does not ensure less susceptibility to religious influence as demonstrated by some members of the Supreme Court.

@Betty Depends on which school that formal education was at... Harvard has a religious component as well as many other so-called "Ivy League" schools which don't necessarily provide a good education and in many cases those with money can buy degrees for their children. Look at Trump he is a classic example.

@Lizard_of_Ahaz Doesn't bode well for the future of your country.

@Betty This has been going on for hundreds of years and one of the factors that has brought us to this knife's edge we are at today. I actually predicted this stage would take place 25 years ago but some incidents slowed it down a bit...
I made my prediction was in 1972...

@Lizard_of_Ahaz I believe you.

4

If you believe that homosexuals are born that way, and I do, this is an interesting question.
I believe there are addictive personalities, just waiting to have the right addiction pounce on them, even actively looking for one.
It is quite clear that many addicts (to any substance) never really become addiction-free, they merely exchange the destructive/illegal one it for something else (religion, sex, NASCAR et al), that is more socially acceptable and allows them to live a more normal life.

Predisposition to addiction is inherited but not absolute. Exposure to addictive personalities can increase the possibility of triggering an addiction. Some addictions are deadly and destructive to life and others like workaholics or perfectionists would be less destructive. As for homosexuality, you are correct. Homosexuality is determined in utero.
You are also correct that addicts will not become addiction-free. One unwanted behaviour must be replaced with a healthier behaviour that is less destructive to everyday life.

4

i think largely people believe what they want to. some develope a desire to believe in a god for comfort, or explanations, or
social belonging, declaring non-believers as idiots. some want to believe there is no god, but can't live with the uncertainty, so with weak ideas they believe are logical conclusions, they declare god as non-existent, and declare any believers as idiots. some just can't manage not being certain one way or another and they spend their time trying to determine facts. few face the fact this is an inquiry to which we just don't get to know the answers. so is belief genetic or conditioned - yes. must be some kind of combination, have you ever seen one without the other?

4

It's conditioned

4

For those predisposed to addiction, much of is genetic. But like any addiction, it can be overcome. This is one reason why AA uses addiction to religion to ease people away from even more harmful addictions. For most people it is more a matter of upbringing and fear of the unknown. Others, it’s just easier than risking being ostracized by family and friends by announcing your lack of faith.

Different areas of the brain develop at different rates which is why we have different personalities and talents. Some are more empathetic and sensitive and are more likely to develop some kind of belief system while others do not.

4

Apparently it's both of nature and nurture. See below.

Ryo1 Level 8 June 19, 2024

The God gene hypothesis proposes that human spirituality is influenced by heredity and that a specific gene, called vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2), predisposes humans towards spiritual or mystic experiences.
References linking genes to complex human traits, such as personality type or disease susceptibility, abound in the news media and popular culture. In his book The God Gene: How Faith is Hardwired into Our Genes, Dean Hamer argues that a variation in the VMAT2 gene plays a role in one's openness to spiritual experiences.
Experimenting with Spirituality: Analyzing The God Gene in a Nonmajors
Laboratory Course
[ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

@Ryo1 It is not universal. Some succomb to its influence and others do not.

@Betty What's not universal? What influence? Are you still talking about the VMAT2 gene, or something else?

@Ryo1 Of course.

5

Conditioned. See also @HippieChick58's and @Fernapple's comments.

7

It's conditioned,you aren't born believing in a deity.

7

Totally conditioned. We're all born agnostic/atheist, it takes teaching and conditioning. Same as your political leanings, you generally learn them from your parents and your life experiences.

I agree to a certain extent. Areas of the brain develop differently and combined with life experiences and the ability to act and react to stimuli will determine their personalities.
We see people in tune with nature and those who could not give a damn. There is a spectrum, some will naturally seek out a higher power (deities, the universe, or nature). Others will seek knowledge and look to science. It is all relative.

5

The tendency to belief may itself, may vary a great deal, between people at a genetic level. But I do not think that belief in a deity, or any specific beliefs are genetic, since virtually no beliefs are common to all cultures. And indeed historically, beliefs in deities are probably not even the commonest sorts, but are quite late developments, only found in mostly post agricultural cultures.

I would not describe the Aboriginals of Australia as being post agricultural cultures, but they have a Dreamtime. See [japingkaaboriginalart.com] for more information.

@anglophone Yes but they do not all have deities, indeed many are animists or ancestor worshipers.

5

Conditioned, or taught. Held in place with fear and/or guilt.

6

I've always believed it was taught. Parents teach their children what they were taught from their parents and on it goes from generation to generation.

Thinking about it...It would seem to me to be a conditioned response. Parents/guardians are the first authority a child experiences then, through social experience, education, professional, and government. Would it be a stretch for most to accept an ultimate authority?
Childhood experiences are the strongest memories, and depending on how personalities develop and their experiences, would that not impact what they are influenced by?

5

Some of both. Genetic: only humans do it. Conditioned: belief is a meme that is transmitted by communication.

What evidence have you seen that only humans do it?

Absence of evidence is evidence of absence, and I'm not the only non-observer. Cite a counter-example of animals having delusional beliefs.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:759174
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.