Agnostic.com

1 0

Will a New Gig Worker Exception Proposed in Massachusetts Change the Future of Work ?

After winning big in California, gig companies take their worker classification fight to Massachusetts

[cnn.com]

. . . alternative sources :

[techcrunch.com]
[msn.com]

. . . the (pdf) text of the proposal :

[vig.cdn.sos.ca.gov]

. . . an analysis from UC Berkeley Labor Center:

[laborcenter.berkeley.edu]

FearlessFly 9 Aug 8
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

I find interesting the incredible level of double-speak. For instance the commitment of 120% of minimum wage that sounds like a wage increase even though it isn't. Similarly, the health care contribution is worded in a way that almost no one will qualify. It is like the author made a list of worker protections, and then created a list of bullet points that sound like improvements even though they aren't. It makes it very difficult to even know what is being voted for. 😛

[noprop22ma.com]

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:614555
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.