Agnostic.com

29 11

We serve the same god but give it a different name. All rivers have different names yet the same water runs through it. - adapted from Muhammad Ali.

Marcel3405 7 May 7
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

29 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

11

Disagree.
I serve no one.

@Anniemae I'd bring dessert, and booze! 😉

8

Time to block another religious nut (sigh).

8

I may serve breakfast in bed, or serve a warrant, but I serve no god or other imaginary being.

Love it!

7

Who is "we " . Got a mouse in your pocket ? Bcz sure shit I serve nobody .

Such a badass.

7

I don't serve any bullshit myth.

7

does that mean all countries are the same because they all have humans running around ?

mzee Level 7 May 7, 2019
6

I'm confused. Why post this on an atheist site where hardly anyone believes in a God?

6

I think most of us here would disagree strongly with the semantics, specifically the words serve and god, and the absolute use of “all. But if you interpret them as broadly as possible I think there’s some merit to the sentiment. We all chase the same high. The rivers don’t all have the same water but it all leads to the same earthly ocean. There are similar Buddhist sayings about how multiple paths can get you to the mountaintop. We all seek self actualization and community.

All the ecstatic experiences of various religions and communities are effectively giving the same voltage. I believe people who get caught up in “the spirit” of any activity with like minds, be it a tent revival, drum circle, funk show, hari Krishna chant, whatever, are experiencing bliss for the same reason. Ecstatic experiences happen when you enter a receptive and/or creative flow state with a group of people, and what we have historically called “spiritual experiences” are those times when we get lost in the motion of others and experience something greater than the sum of its parts.

I’ve also experienced ecstatic states while alone in wild places - nature provides the ‘others’ I suppose. But that ‘something greater than the sum of its parts’ Yes!

no we don't. i know a hell of a lot of people who do not seek self-actualization or anything but a place to sleep and something to eat, or a better life for their kids, or money, or power. we do not all seek the same thing. we really don't. stinky metaphor. not every metaphor rings true.

g

@genessa I did address the fact that absolute statements can’t be made for everyone and the rest of that is Maslows hierarchy of needs interrupting. Of course if you don’t have food or shelter those are top priorities first for survival. Once survival needs have been met we seek social acceptance and self actualization, freedom, purpose with our careers and mindsets. And yeah there are always exceptions to everything but generally even the most antisocial among us still ultimately find their purpose through others or a higher context than themselves. There’s a reason every culture has one or multiple customs of getting caught up in a flow with one another through song or dance, drums, chants, psychedelics, meditation, yoga, all of them lead to the same flow state of mind. And there’s a word for that kind of bliss in just about every culture I know of.

Even misery loves company. When you’re in prison with the worst off of humanity, the biggest punishment they can give you is isolation. That speaks to the deep human need for connection for all of us whether we want to admit it or not. We are highly socialized animals that depend on numbers to survive. I can imagine almost no one except narcissists, sociopaths and chemically damaged people find satisfying meaning purely in their own self absorption.

@Wurlitzer i see you are defining self-actualization rather broadly. your premise is that we need each other, which is correct, but that is certainly not the definition of self-actualization!

g

@genessa “the realization or fulfillment of one's talents and potentialities, especially considered as a drive or need present in everyone.” Are there any talents or potentialities of practical significance at all if anyone were in a vacuum unto themselves? None of it matters at all except in relation to others.

@Wurlitzer that much is true enough. i still say not everyone seeks self-actualization, especially on a conscious level.

g

@genessa well no not always actively and consciously of course I grant you that; like you said some of us don’t have the luxury of philosophical introspection when we can’t afford basic essentials and education. If everyone could put their finger on it and knew what it would take to find fulfillment I think we could almost all find that’s it though. And of course there are infinite paths to finding that out, which is what I think is the root of what the OP and similar quotes, most religions and philosophies are ideally trying to get at.

I gotta correct my insistence that this only happens through connecting with other people actually; the other notable exception is through connecting with nature. Same water, different river. Still a major path to feeling less separated from the world and more apart of something greater. I think most of us need more of both nature and community but some perfectly fine people definitely like more of one than the other.

5

Rubbish. Even Ali chose one 'river' to the exclusion of all others. So, hypocrisy as well, if he did indeed say this.

5

You won't get many positive comments with this statement in AGNOSTIC.COM!

5

I guess 'we' means you and your friends, because I do not serve ANYONE, least to say all that bunch of imaginary stupid fantasies like Snow White, jehova, Hansel & Gretel, jesus, satan, thor, etc... but I must say I like Marvel movies!

5

This post is the reason why I know I haven't lost my sanity. Do people really believe this without contemplating the message?

5

Huh -- then why are you here?

Showing that he think different.

4

Bullshit

4

too many blows to the head I think.

4

Rubbish. I feel no sense of political correctness to conform to any hero worship of Mr. Cassius Clay, AKA Muhammad Ali.

If it's all all the same god, why are all the theologies inconsistent? Why have these religions fought each other for millennia? Why have countless died in these wars? Why is this one God so incompetent at conveying its existence and purpose? It's the God of stupidity and ignorance, created from our own foolishness, and it serves only to thwart our progress.

4

Yeah, I don't listen to pedophiles, thnx.

3

Who is "we" and not all rivers have the same water. That is some crazy talk right there.

3

I serve no god.

3

no we don't. most of us here serve no gods whatsoever. why would you say we serve the same god on a site geared toward folks who either do not believe there are any gods or firmly believe there are no gods? and by the way, even what ali said about rivers isn't true. it isn't the same water. it may be the same water flowing through all parts of EACH river (and i have heard the opposite -- that you can't step into the same river twice because it is always changing). all rivers do not have the same water in them. anyone who has ever seen at least two rivers knows that.

g

2

He made no sense. Flowery language does not make it the truth. All Gods are terribly different from one another, the ways we follow are horribly different and the basic tenets of belief are... hellishly different.

That's why they said, the tailor should do tailoring that he is good at, the barber should do barbering. Boxing was his expertise. Like Moravian said below, too many blows to the head.

This is just one example of how we idolize people and make them heroes for wrong reasons.

2

Yep, all abrahamic religions are heresies from each other.
Judaism is probably an heresy of an ancient polytheistic semitic religion, YHWH was one of the gods of this religion.
Christianity is a Heresy of Judaism, Islam is an heresy of christianity.
They all worship the same imaginary friend YHWH. Actualy the name is not different, they just don't use the name of the god, calling it only the god in a sign that they think it is unique.

2

Not really... Lol

1

I don't agree, but I get what Ali means by this.

1

Even though Ali aka. Cassius Clay turned to Islamic dogma his god reference is not germane here in any form!

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:343417
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.