Agnostic.com

17 5

A Trump 2020 supporter at or Community Recreation Center has added stickers to his car that equate Democrats to Socialists. He’s too ignorant to realize that his gym membership is subsidized by NY state and is a “socialist” program.

ADKSparky 8 June 1
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

17 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

My electricity is provided by a member-owned co-op, banking by a member-owned credit union. My insurance and financial management are handled by an association of member/owners. Some of my groceries come from a store that is 100% owned by the employees. Most of my shopping is done at Walmart or Amazon, both publicly owned by shareholders such as myself.

All of these entities are basically the same, examples of group effort, and they add immense real wealth to society. They all operate under government regulations.

Forget the capitalist/socialist dichotomy—that’s sort of bogus. LONG LIVE GROUP EFFORTS!

0

All thugs!

SCal Level 7 June 1, 2019
1

LMAO idiot

bobwjr Level 10 June 1, 2019
0

Trump supporters lacks some intelligence. Look they voted for president.

0

Some Rethuglicans are just so ignorant.

1

Fox News and other conservative sources have trained their listeners to respond to the word; socialism, as if it were a cockroach crawling across the dinner table. They're all so misinformed they think ALL socialism is the oppressive Marxist version that kills individuality and discourages personal success. They see bread lines and government cheese giveaways completely ignorant of the fact that there are many socialist programs working in this country right in front of their faces.

It's exhausting dealing with the seemingly bottomless level of ignorance conservatives display.

How would socialism work without replacing individual rights with collective ones? By definition socialism is collectivist.

@Happy_Killbot Collectivism isn't some onerous concept designed to strip people of their rights or individuality, it's a means to do the most good for the most people -- at least in this country. I have no kids but I'd be fine with paying a little extra in taxes to support debt-free college because it's better for the country as a whole. Conservatives hate socialism because it benefits others on their dime. I see it as an investment in making a better country for all.

@Sgt_Spanky That doesn't really answer my question. Free schooling means that everyone gets the same advantage in life and is therefore equal, but not necessarily collectivist. You got schooling for yourself as a kid, so in theory everyone ends up paying for their own education once they are in the workforce. The definition you are using seems to be more utilitarian than collectivist.

High debt for college students is a recent problem which was caused by the government making all student loans public (socialized ) So that they could sell government debt to the students. If we go all the way and make all schools fully socialized, that means that they could sell all their debt to the public, meaning that they would have low risk investments paid for by the american people. Democrats love socialism because it benefits them on others' dime.

0

in the United States we have a mixture of socialism and capitalism.

I think it's important to reference the definitions:

in a socialist system the government is in controls the means of production.

in a capitalist system the private sector controls the means of production.

in the growing socialist movement in the Democratic Party we see a desire to increase government control of essential Industries.

first will be Healthcare.

don't believe it will stop there.

after reading 1984 by George Orwell I'm reminded of a quote:" we should have never trusted them"

There are certain "markets" that don't lend themselves to capitalism. Healthcare is one. Education is another. Fire departments, police are more. The military is yet another.

The value in many areas of life have no direct monetary value (although certainly indirect ones). The value in healthcare is not money, but health. The value of education is not money, but functional individuals and groups. The value of fire departments, police, and military are all necessary for the general good.

If we were the kind of society that just let people die without health insurance, or had a choice as to whether we wanted to live or die, or let our children live or die, then a for profit health insurance industry in a for profit healthcare industry might work. But when the market is set by "how much are you or your health insurance willing to pay to save your child's life", the market is broken.
[nytimes.com]

I would like to believe that the Invisible Hand of supply and demand can solve all problems, sadly I cannot your points are valid. I ran into a man today who was talking to me bald a bill before Congress to reduce rent, this kind of government intervention would clearly be a violation of capitalist principles although it may have popular support.

Trump care? Romney care?

Take off the blinders, man.

There is no good govt.

@m16566 Sadly, rent reductions are desperately needed by millions. Increases in the cost of housing has far outpaced inflation and increases in income for tens of millions of Americans. Add student loan debt that has nearly tripled in the last decade or so, and a significant number of Americans need government subsidies for housing. Meantime, we have a record number of domiciles sitting vacant as banks continue to make obscene amounts of money on housing loans (yet get completely bailed out by all of us when they deliberately engineer a housing bubble they knew was going to collapse).

The American people who work full time deserve a break. It's bad enough that almost all new income in the last 11 years has gone to the top 1%, and that the wealth and income gaps have grown exponentially since the 1970s. And these aren't unrelated, accidental, or coincidental phenomena.

Unchecked capitalism is the source of almost all of our society's present evils. I get reminded of this fact nearly every day in my profession. It has bred out of control selfishness and greed, and has left most Americans struggling just to get by, while a tiny handful continue to grow more and more wealth, and hoard more and more income.

Textbook socialism isn't great, but capitalism hardly seems to be the answer, either. At least not for more than 160 million Americans. But I guess it's easier for some to believe that 160 million people are stupid and lazy than it is to believe that about 300,000 or so are excessively greedy and selfish.

@greyeyed123

The Scandanavian countries privatized their education system with a state run option. Because Capitalism works in ALL markets, the state option got crushed and was forced to make sweeping improvements.

Look at the US college system and healthcare systems since govt has gotten involved.

Many people conflate pooled resources with govt control. Not the same thing. Govt control of these systems clearly does not work.

it's not a matter necessarily shrinking the government.
it is a matter of what areas you want the government involved in, do you want the government to fix prices?
have Supply quotas?
involve itself in central planning of agriculture and Industry.?
what industries are you willing to turn over to the government?
I believe the next industry the social Democrats will attempt to control will be the energy sector under the guise of the green New Deal

@BryanLV Since you say capitalism works in all markets, should we abolish the military for competitive, private bidders?

How can capitalism work in ALL markets when a pharmaceutical company can arbitrarily set a price on a life saving drug simply because you will die (or your child) without it?

Capitalism is not magic, nor perfect. That doesn't mean we toss it. It means we mitigate the problems with it.

Also, can you cite some sources on this claim: "Because Capitalism works in ALL markets, the state option got crushed and was forced to make sweeping improvements."

I have found a small percentage of students in Sweden go to private schools.

I have found that "Only a small number of independent schools exist in Finland, and even they are all publicly financed. None is allowed to charge tuition fees."

Huh.

Denmark I find, "Denmark has a tradition of private schools and about 15.6% of all children at basic school level attend private schools, which are supported by a voucher system"

And at this point I am giving up. The state option got crushed? I'm not sure what you are talking about. Can you be more specific?

3

"Keep your government hands off my medicare!"

1

The US one party system is socialist and fascist on both sides. There is no denying that the republicrats and demopublicans are simply two wings of the same bird. They always agree when the goal is to grow govt power, authority and reach. Government never shrinks, reduces its power or spends less money.

The right wants a theocratic, dictatorial, fascist system.

The left wants a democratic, communist, fascist system.

Both sides are authoritarian. Both sides commonly encourage using fraud and force against peaceful people in order to push their terrible agendas on to society.

Neither side is tolerant of Capitalism, free markets or free people. They are each constantly seeking an angle to seize control and install further authoritarian measures. Their sympathizers make excuses for their behavior and make the endless growth of govt possible.

SCal Level 7 June 1, 2019

Something that has always bothered me is the miss use of the term Fascism. Authoritarian is usually a better word for what is meant. Fascism is at it's corp a cult of personality. Trump is a would be Fascist. Bernie is not. The all time world champion fascist was Franco of Spain. Hitler and Mussolini got the press but they were losers. Franco was undefeated.

clearly there is a difference between the parties.
if you want more government control more government services a larger government ,
then you are a Democrat or socialist.

@Casey07

Bernie is not a cult a personality because you say so?

Fascism is loosely defined as a state that uses propaganda and force of violence in order to exact its agenda.

Both dems and repubs bomb, invade and torture. They both weaponize the courts and police forces and break their own rules to the detriment of freedom.

The US is clearly fascist.

@m16566

The only difference is their stupid rhetoric. The democrats just admit that they want a huge welfare/warfare state. The repubs just lie and act like the want small govt. Clearly they don't.

Name the republican that shrunk govt in any meaningful way.

Don't worry. I will wait.

it's not a matter necessarily shrinking the government.
it is a matter of what areas you want the government involved in, do you want the government to fix prices?
have Supply quotas?
involve itself in central planning of agriculture and Industry.?
what industries are you willing to turn over to the government?
I believe the next industry the social Democrats will attempt to control will be the energy sector under the guise of the green New Deal

@m16566

Yes it is a matter of shrinking govt. Nice try on side stepping the question.

Have you never heard the term small govt republican? Of course its a misnomer.

I don't want govt controlling or involved in anything.

@BryanLV "I don't want govt controlling or involved in anything."

No laws? No president? No representatives? No military? No states? No counties? No judge?. No juries? No votes? Really?

@greyeyed123

No one has a moral right to be immoral. Anarchism means no rulers, not no rules. Govt has a monopoly on forceful aggression.

Voting is violence in a non-voluntary society. I do not need to be represented. There is no need for a head chimp.

Govt was kind of a good idea 200 years ago.

States and countries are just legal fictions. All you have to do is look at a photo of Earth from space to realize states and countries are not real. There are no border lines on Earth, they are concocted by humans.

We are all a part of the same human species under natural laws of the cosmos.

@BryanLV Good luck with that.

@greyeyed123

Good luck with "democracy".

@BryanLV Thank you.

@BryanLV You are mistaken. Fascism is a particular sort of evil. with your definition Red China is a fascist state. But nobody calls it that because it's not.

@Casey07 No such thing as Evil, but yes. China is also a Fascist state.

No brainer.

@BryanLV You are the only one who thinks so. Don't take my word for it, just Google "fascist governments" and learn. Brainer....No such thing as evil...Huh?

@Casey07 Try googling "fascism", socialism, capitalism, communisn, anarchism. They all have specific criteria that's not hard to determine.

And no. There's no such thing as evil. It's an abstract term with no referrent.

@BryanLV The very first fascist government was Mussolini's Italy. If you Google Fascist governments you will see a list of every fascist government ever...There is a word for an agenda that seeks to hurt,injure, victimize, cause pain, inflict genocide, etc What word would you use to describe such an agenda.. Or do you deny thses things happen.

@Casey07 Reading more history might help.

@BryanLV try reading a dictionary too. At least you concede my point re evil.

@Casey07

EVIL

  1. profound immorality and wickedness, especially when regarded as a supernatural force.

IAbstract. No physical referrent. Nothing has been conceded. Try again.

2

A subsidized gym membership isn't the same thing as socialism. Correct me if New York state does something different, but subsides give tax cuts to companies that meet certain criteria, usually something that the government wants to encourage like regular exercise. They offer for companies to not have to pay as high a tax if they offer the gym membership as a benefit. This way the company can decide if the tax cut is worth paying for gym membership.

Socialism is about the means of production being jointly owned by the workers.

It would be socialist if the government owned the gym and he could use it for free, although he would pay for it through taxes regardless of if he used it.

It could also be considered socialist if he owned the gym along with everyone else that worked there, and they distributed the profits amongst themselves.

You could also consider it socialist if the cost of the gym membership was covered by his insurance which was government owned and payed for through taxes.

If New York state is reimbursing the company for the cost of the gym membership then that would be socialist.

Under a socialist economic system, subsidies aren't a thing because the government is already in control of the industry so there is no need to tax it.

4

Many people have been misinformed about socialism. They don't even know what it is.

So true! I think Americans really want socialism but they have this misconstrued idea that socialism equals communism. It was all brought about in the McCarthy era.

will you define socialism and communism for me please
I suggest the only difference between communism and socialism is,
socialism allows some private ownership of the means of production.
communism does not allow any ownership of the means of production by the private sector.
clearly I accept that we do have a mixed capitalist system in this country now it's just a matter how much socialism you want to put in the mix

will you give me an example of an existing socialist State today, that can be considered successful.

@m16566 most European countries are socialist

The United Kingdom is a western style democracy operating under a free market economic system. The UK has many similarities to the Social Democracies of the EU but in many ways the UK is economically more conservative. ... This same conservative movement has been skeptical of the European Union.

ermany has a mixed economy. It allows a free market economy in consumer goods and business services. But the government imposes regulations even in those areas to protect its citizens. Germany has a command economy in defense since everyone receives the benefit, while those with higher incomes pay more in taxes.Dec 21, 2018

2

At least he didn't equate Democrats to Communists.

Yes he did.

@Casey07 Obviously you evidently equate Socialism with Communism.

@jlynn37 Not really. Communism is unworkable, evidenced by the fact that it takes a totalitarian dictatorship to hold power. Socialism, administered by a democratic republic is by far the most humane of systems. That is when you consider the alternatives. Do you know of any or are you just a critic.

@Casey07 I am only responding to your comment "Yes he did."

2

I think many people are confused by the definition. As indicated by the Socialist Nazi Party. Too lazy to look it up and give it some thoughts on the matter.

It was the National socialist workers party! It had noting to do with socialism unless you count the genocide they committed as a-socialist act an horrid ethnic cleansing campaign!

@of-the-mountain yes, you are correct.

will you give me an example of an existing socialist State today, that can be considered successful.

@m16566
Norway, Denmark, Finland, and Sweden!

Sweden is losing it battle with the left trying too hard to please everyone, it has diminished their proven institutions!

@of-the-mountain 👍

4

Just like those who use the ACA!

Yet will not ever support or use Obamacare!

LOL!😱

2

It's all good. False equivalents are used by both sides. Die hard Democrats and Republicans are both blind and ignorant.

3

Subsidized gym memberships are a long way from any of these three definitions of socialism:

Definition of socialism

1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

2a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property

b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

BD66 Level 8 June 1, 2019

Sounds more like communism to me.but then I think many Americans are confused as to which is which.

thanks for making those definition so clear, it is my opinion that the vast majority of people lack sufficient education as to the politics and economics.
I believe that the Social Democratic wing of the Democratic Party does not get beyond the idea of getting free stuff from the government.
socialism work so long as you don't run out of other people's money.
I believe that they think there's in an aqueous group of rich people, who will willingly give over their wealth to the state.
everywhere that socialism has been tried has resulted in poverty and wasted resources.

@m16566 Oh, you mean like in Scandinavia where they have universal health care, the best schools in the world, clean environment, social programs for criminal rehabilitation, cooperative food production, good roads, affordable electricity and water, clean air and water, paid leave and vacation, and free child care, etc. Wow, I'd be heartbroken if I had all of that.

The Nordic model combines features of capitalism, such as a market economy and economic efficiency, with social benefits, such as state pensions and income distribution. This model is most commonly associated with the countries of Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, and Iceland.Jun 21, 2018

is a market economy

@AnonySchmoose Simplest way to find out whether a country is Socialist, go to Google and type "(name of country" ETF". If you get no results, that country is likely Socialist. If you do get results, that means the corporations of that country are owned by private individuals, and you can buy a share of the corporations in that country.

@m16566 Scandinavian countries are examples of socialist democracies ... which America could do well by emulating. But the bulk of American politicians don't want good conditions for everyone ... only good for the 1%. Socialism in a democracy is not communism. The longer Americans conflate socialism and communism, the longer life for the 99% remains horrible and unfair. Tragically, many Americans love to confuse other Americans by equating socialism with communism. I feel such Americans are frauds.

How much money do I need to have to be in the 1%
do you know, then tell me the economy is good for me.
all my life I've been well employed and earned while in my investments have paid me well what does it take to make me a one percenter

A fascist is a follower of a political philosophy characterized by authoritarian views and a strong central government — and no tolerance for opposing opinions. Fascisttraces to the Italian word fascio, meaning "group, bundle." Under fascist rule, the emphasis is on the group — the nation — with few individual rights.
The United States does not meet this definition.

The Bill of Rights is the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution. It spells out Americans' rights in relation to their government. It guarantees civil rightsand liberties to the individual—like freedom of speech, press, and religion.Oct 12, 2016

why is the United States a fascist state?

please explain to this old man the difference between socialism and communis.
Karl Marx said that socialism was a transition to Communism.
it's just a matter of degree, how much State Control over the means of production can you tolerate. I think you're just regurgitating buzzwords

@AnonySchmoose Hear! Hear! Well said and I agree completely!

3

SMFH

Fucking dumbass.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:355179
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.