Agnostic.com

32 11

My partner says that my labeling religious people "delusional" (which has mental health connotations), lets them off the hook. Rather, he says, we should say they're willfully ignorant or some similar expression that holds them accountable for their irrationality. While I can see my partner's point, I can't shake the notion that for an adult to continue to believe the nonsense that religions teach (virgin births, blessed trinities, resurrections from the dead, eternal reward or punishment, angels, demons, etc.) is a form of insanity. Your thoughts?

Rob48 7 Sep 19
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

32 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

10

These people are not necessarily ignorant .The world is populated with many extremely intelligent religious people .IQ and religiosity have no correlation, this is a proven fact .Just read up on the scientific studies . .Andrew Magdy Kamal is one of many examples.Apparently he has the highest IQ ever recorded 231.734 .Being religious and believing in a god has to do with brainwashing and cultural indoctrination from birth.

@Winkiedink54 They are indeed related.The dictionary defines stupidly as the quality or state of lacking intelligence .Also there is a big difference to coming to conclusions related to god or religion on your own vs being indoctrinated from birth with this nonsense

@richiegtt But everyone is indoctrinated from birth depending on culture, class, race.

From what I see Americans are indoctrinated into the American Dream which is as nonsensical, and has proved to be so, as any religious ideal

9

To be that ignorant to think that every believer and religious person has a form of insanity is insanity in itself .Also I see that anyone that challenged your ridiculous claim is negatively treated in your replies which indicates you are a close minded individual.You ask for members thoughts ,but what you really wanted were only people to reinforce your stupid idea .All your thoughts on this subject are layman’s ideas and are not based on studies ,psychology or anything of value.

nonbeliever1:Thanks for stating what I would have said.

8

What nonsense.People believe in god and follow a religion due to their culture,environment, parents and so on . Are children delusional or insane because they believe in Santa Claus or the tooth fairy,of course not ,they have been taught into believing in this,the same as believers.

@Winkiedink54 That’s exactly the problem, certain people do not have the traits mentality or will to stop believing in the fairytales of religion or god that was forced upon them from their youth ,but this is a personal characteristic not a mental illness.

@Winkiedink54 You are incorrect.Children stop believing in Santa etc because their parents or whoever do not chastise them or keep on encouraging them to do so . It is the opposite in adults who are surrounded by their religious friends ,family and culture who continue to reinforce their beliefs on a daily basis.

@Winkiedink54 You are the one with the mental disorder due to the fact that you can not except the truth and are to close minded to understand all the logical comments on his post that I have reviewed that make more sense than your illogical replies

@Winkiedink54 your perception against religion sounds too much like a religion of its own (an anti-religious religion).

Your preaching against religion is no different from those you preach against.

My thoughts on religion is that every religion (from pagan to scientology, even including anti-religion) has the "right" to believe what they want. On the obverse everyone has the "right" to not listen.

No one should ever be "forced" to do something that they can't support in their thinking.

@Winkiedink54 I try to stay away from radicals of any thought. Religious. Political. I feel they are all in the same category as serial rapist and mass murderers. I give all of them a wide berth.

8

My thoughts are that to label religious people Insane or delusional is preposterous.Some of the most brilliant people in history were religious believers such as Galielo,Isaac Newton ,Louis Pasteur,Copernicus,Marconi ,Just to name a few.

@Winkiedink54 I guess you do not know or care what the Psychiatric criteria for delusional is . These people may possibly be deluded,misguided,brainwashed or gullible.These are not psychiatric disorders .Being delusional is .

@HarrySlick Just to be clear. Do I read you correctly that being "deluded" is psychologically distinct from being "delusional"?

@vertrauen Of course it is different .Deluded means being persuaded or tricked into thinking a certain way by a religion,peer group your upbringing etc .Being Delusional is a mental illness .A person may think they are being followed tormented etc such as a paranoid schizophrenic.One is a mental illness the other is not

@Winkiedink54 They are deluded NOT delusional . You do not seem to comprehend this .I will give you an example .Liberals have been deluded into thinking AOC is logical and intelligent.Delusional is if liberals actually think they here her whispering in their ear that she is logical and intelligent.

@fedup Ha,ha that’s spot on .Perfect example of pathetic DELUDED creatures .

7

In my opinion , is the person a good person , is a lot more important , than labeling them . If I know someone who will see to it that you get to a hospital when you need to be there , no questions asked , I don't care what their beliefs are based on . I don't need the fairy tales , but sometimes others do . In some cases , religion is a crutch , it's guidance , it's a social network , it's a team working towards a common goal , and these are not necessairly bad things . For instance , when people come together to build a new hospital , or a shelter for the homeless , or soup kitchens , these are great things . If they're doing this , but the only thing you're doing , is looking for appropriate bully labels , then I'd prefer to be with the fairy tale believers .

From Brother Camus. I can't think of any other eloquent way to put this:

"The evil that is in the world always comes of ignorance, and good intentions may do as much harm as malevolence, if they lack understanding. On the whole, men are more good than bad; that, however, isn’t the real point. But they are more or less ignorant, and it is this that we call vice or virtue; the most incorrigible vice being that of an ignorance that fancies it knows everything and therefore claims for itself the right to kill."

Cast1es:I wholeheartedly agree .It is refreshing to see one of the few compassionate members address this issue .Non believers like this guy who submitted this post just add to the divide and give non believers a bad reputation

6

To all the delusional arm chair experts who think religious people and believers are delusional .Delusions are only diagnosed if they’re not consistent with the persons existing belief system and views.A devout creationist talks to God while in church, that’s fine.An avowedly atheist lawyer starts doing it in a middle of a meeting,this persons probably delusional.If both of them suddenly started saying the world is going to end in 30 minutes because of angry frogs living in the sun,they’d both be considered delusional.

From what I have read in addition to common sense , I definitely agree , but some non believers get pleasure in feeling superior to believers every chance they get due to their own ignorance ,this makes them no better than religious people that look down upon atheists etc.

A schizophrenic believes the weird world in their head. Does that mean he/she is not delusional?
If a christion schizophrenic says he is talking to demons, is that not delusion based on the fact that he really believes in demons?

5

I tend to think that 'deluded' is a better term for the rampant Faithfools than delusional is.
I.e. they HAVE been deluded from an early age and know no different simply because, imho, they lack what it takes to view both sides of the topic.
Deluding a person with, perhaps, a weak will, etc, is how religions have thrived and multiplied for centuries, IF the 'weak will' can be strengthened enough then the corrosive and destructive influences of the religion/s will steadily lessen and eventually be replaced by Reasoning and Logic, etc.
However, having said that, in some cases such a task would be like trying to remove a mountain by using a teaspoon and a thimble.

Deluded rather than delusional is an excellent point

4

Ya know... I've found that certain people are willing and able to introspect. Some people are hell-bent against it. Some people wouldn't, in a million years, consider meditation or even trying yoga. It can be scary to connect to yourself, or to disconnect to observe from the outside. These are the wizard of oz's people who consistently choose to not look behind the curtain.

I believe that what you are talking about may be due to the same issue. If one is prone to being non-introspective, my bet is that one is also less prone to questioning societal norms or a societal belief system (ie, thoughts that came from outside versus inside).

When confronted with a non-introspector, I often, in my bones, have a reaction that tells me they are practicing willful ignorance. But, what if that is just the voice of my introspection abilities/propensity when being confronted with an opposing way to live? It sure does seem like life would be easier if one could not-introspect, but I'd not choose to be that way if I could.

So...what if this delusionalness is just a manifestation of the way they are, as humans, deep in their psyche? Instead of blaming, shaming or stigmatizing...what if it's just part of the standard human deviation?

@Winkiedink54 What's so funny 'bout peace, love and understanding?

If our numbers are growing, then the change you desire is coming, inherently. Perhaps not fast enough for some, though. On our side, we, you and I, must tolerate each other, because we are working for the same goals, albeit with varying levels of fervor.

@Winkiedink54 ‘They’ are not in China and North Korea, I would suggest.

@Winkiedink54 What's so funny is that I'd say you are confusing losing a battle versus losing the war. All of the things you named are temporary situations... like losing the race against another car to the next stop light. I might be more inclined to greater militancy if I saw anything on your list of grievances as irreversible. All are reversible, easily. All will be reversed soon enough.

I shall reply no further to you, as the pattern of your thinking has been made clear in replies to me, as well as to others on this thread. I find your mentality as problematic as those who you are so vociferously demonizing. Good day. 🖖

4

Yep nuttier than squirrel poop

3

I take a simple approach as I am totally non-delusional.

3

I agree. It's degrees of insanity. If you fit within the normal threshold for insanity, you don't get institutionalized.

3

Ignorant and delusional both have negative connotations and will immediately put people in defensive mode making it impossible to enlighten them with logic.

If the goal is to just be combative and superior then either option is fine and of little significant difference.

If the goal is discourse or education then something better must be thought of. Something that’s less on the nose and has at least a chance of making them think rather than automatically engaging their belief defense mode.

I had a thought about what it could be when I started writing this. Now I’ve forgotten it! Ahh well, maybe some of you have good ideas.

@Winkiedink54 we agree on that. Just remember in any public discussion on the matter the people you’ll have to convince are most likely also believers. So it’s best not to alienate them from the start with divisive terms

3

I think it’s deeper than ignorance too, delusion is a much more accurate, stronger term for what’s going on. It’s a typical symptom of mental illness yeah, but clinically inevitable mental illness is not the only way to be deluded.

Delusion - an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder.

The incidental extra info is that this is symptomatic of mental disorders, but the meat of that definition is all spot on exactly what’s happening. And in a way a lot of em could be considered to have a mental disorder I’m sure, but the term doesn’t automatically let them off the hook, and to a certain extent most people who were indoctrinated early enough probably deserve to be cut some slack. It’s not that they’re stupid and their ignorance is only a small part of what’s going on. They’re brainwashed, and set into a system where they’re afraid that questioning will damn them to hell. It’s a big hurdle to get over when education of oneself is stigmatized with the threat of eternal punishment. They’ve been set up with mental blocks that are just as detrimental in a lot of ways as a naturally occurring disorder.

@Winkiedink54 no doubt, who said it wasn’t? Whether they’re hallucinating because of mental illness, extrinsic chemicals, or their own brainwashing who would want that?

2

It's going to play out the way it's going to play out. They're doing their part and you're doing your part. It's Evolution, baby.

2

I don’t like either label. They think differently than I do. That’s it.

2

Some of the faithful can probably be diagnosable. But we all have remarkable ability to suspend disbelief. Which explains movies, and to a large extent, Trump supporters....

And as to ignorance. We are all ignorant; it's just a matter of degree. I doubt the majority of our ignorance is truly "willful." But we do have the talent to lie to ourselves, so in that sense, perhaps it is willful.

2

Some are in denial of science, and need the security offered by a supposed perfect being who watches over (them/us) all.

2

If we punish the religious for being so, we have become what we hate. The United States has freedom of religion because, for on thing, you can not require belief. They alone can change their perspective. The only thing we can do is address their confusions about us when they are expressed.

MrDMC Level 7 Sep 20, 2019
2

I agree with your partner. Willfully ignoring their intellect and sensibilities.

1

Self Deluded rather than delusional, but I also prefer the term willfully ignorant.

1

Fear, insecurity, lazy thinking, lack of personal responsibility. Some folks want a playbook that let's them off the hook for decision-making while protecting their reputation among the other non-thinkers.

1

how about--just plain fcking dumb.

Was Isaac Newton dumb ?

@HarrySlick In some ways yes, the bulk of his work was in alchemy and Hermetic magic, the physics stuff was only a side line and comprised only a little over 5% of his legacy.
Knowledge, intelligence and wisdom are not synonymous, few people have all three some have two if they are lucky.
However it has often been wise for the intelligent person to play the game of religion and escape the ministrations of the church rather than declare their truth and burn for it in this world rather than in a Hell they know not to exist.

1

Your only referring to Christian doctrine and Catholic at that! Perhaps widen your scope and a different picture may arise.

This is rooted in deep psychology. Perhaps it will give a broader understanding in that context.

1

Many Christians will call atheist delusional, some put them at the level of a rapists. I finally have given up dating religious women because I can't be saved and I am agnostic. My daughter is agnostic and she thinks I am too hard on them. I am too tired of hearing about God done everything for us and gets credit for everything I do well. God is their ultimate love, I am somewhere inline of 4th place along their love for their dog.

1

Willfully ignorant, truly ignorant, mentally ill, dishonest, corrupt, frightened, there may be many reasons, and most believers will have a little of more than one. But I do not want to put any on the hook except the rich exploiting minority perhaps. It is far better to talk and set good examples, it will take time but but quick results usually unravel quickly, it took chistianity a thousand years plus to become established to the point it is, things change faster perhaps in the digital age, but not that quickly.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:404434
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.