What I did not realise before is how much many members of Agnostic hate religion. I have no reason to hate it. It gave me beautiful music. It never harmed me. I never believed in any of the gods they put forward. I happily mixed in the highest musical circles because of it. I delighjted in my contacts with the Hare Krsna's and totally ignored the writings of Prabupada. My wife loved OSHO and his words were quite inspirational. I once played with an arab band in Tunis and with a Sufi band in Vancouver. The sufis were wonderful though I refused to have any close relationship with Islam. I did however study Sufi thinking for over 10 years. I really enjoyed my contacts with the Quakers. Each religion had ancient texts which I regarded as teaching metaphors. The whole stuff about Jesus smacked of much more ancient sun worship by for instant the Egyptians. All of the religious stuff I read was useful philosophical ideas. All religion is merely ideas though starstruck adherants work themselves into frenzies. Why we should believe more ideas of 2000 years ago rather than facing truths of today is mystery. We occasionally have gloom and doom and end of world prophets today; should we take any more notice of prophets from ages ago. Much religion is there to mass control. I recently watched something about the Mormons and so saw a whole people under complete control by an idea.
Why hate religion? I happily dispute with believers. We can still be friends.
The thing is that I am convinced that in hospital 2 years ago I met three beings from not of this world whose sole purpose with me was to ensure that I lived. Fine and good but I am left with the question why? What am I to do? What must I learn?
So now you can shake your heads and regard me as as a nutcase typical mensa out of reality.
Freedom of belief is where it's at. Be thankful you grew up in a secular society that allowed you to explore other options and/ or devise your very own regarding the non-physical aka spiritual.
I don't think we hate religions per say, just some of their outcomes; The indoctrination of immature minds the #1 problem for me.
Indoctrination of children, I must say is so so wrong, but regarding belief ideology only. Indoctrinate them in science and language so they may be functioning members of the societal group......all good. Especially bad belief indoctrination when much of religious doctrine has a threat of eternal damnation for non conformity, that is what angers us. Kids grow into adults and the process continues.
Also when their doctrine aka laws and rules aka dogma is thrust forcefully onto others, that also angers.
From the dark ages until post WW I art is dominated by religious themes in our societies. And you conclude that was due to inspiration? I put it down to suppression, destruction and dominance by religion, especially in Europe. There would have been so much art that did not survive this period or was never even produced due to what can only be described as a type of cultural censorship overseen by religious dominance. How much art was destroyed during the Dark ages?
I am fully atheist, and this was before I went to Thailand, but I recall getting really upset when the Taliban blew up the cliff Buddhas in Afghanistan, pre 9/11. I'm talking hole in the pit of my stomach upset. I distinctly remember questioning why I was so upset, just religious symbolism after all. But then I realised it was the destruction of art that was upsetting me. That certain humans took it upon themselves to destroy the work of others, denying others now and all future generations as well. This is what made me ponder what they got up to in the Dark Ages with all the Pagan art etc. I think much was destroyed so don't think a pro of religion is art. Religious art was the only art allowed is more correct imo. Love is what inspires art more than anything. Love is something religions like to claim they have a monopoly on but they are dreaming, thinking that. Don't need "Goat herder's guides to the galaxy"s to educate people what love is
Thanks, good thoughts.
@rogerbenham Here's one to do your head in, rings true for me because of the irony in it.
Let's say we do have a soul. Then the question is, "Does the soul survive when the physical body dies?". Let's say yes again.
That means there will be no physical restraints on our imagination. No rules in the non-physical existence. You may create what you wish without physical restraints. Sounds quite wonderful.
But if this is the case then theists, those who have subscribed to religious doctrine, will create their own restraints in the non physical world; A Heaven and Hell. So these people may indeed create themselves a Heaven but would that not be a prison in an existence with no physical laws? And as most assume they have "sinned", their souls create a prison of Hell instead. Whereas atheists will only be restricted by their own imagination in any post existence, not bound by doctrine learnt during their lifetime.
Now is that irony or what?
Personally, being a pessimist, 'm expecting to be worm food but if there is a light when I die, I'd be inclined to head the other way.
@puff Well I can't argue, is there ever any point?, But I can say that I have experiences which you have not. But all of what you wrote sounds nuts, as you intended.
@rogerbenham Does not all belief seem nuts to the non believer? They are all based on a set of assumptions. A lot of "ifs". I like pondering, following threads of assumptions that I do not subscribe to and see where it logically leads. And how what reality is seems illogical.
Luckily I can differentiate between belief and knowledge. It's when belief is accepted as knowledge we get into problems.
@puff Indeed
I once saw a young girl in utter grief, sobbing uncontrollably, and could not be comforted. I learned that someone had told her that Santa did not exist, and it was as if she had lost an actual loved one. Some might say, how awful that someone told her the truth about Santa. I say, how awful that someone told her the lie in the first place.
A child may believe they "love" Santa, but in actuality, they "love" the concept, the idea, of Santa. Because, Santa does not exist. You cannot love an unsubstantiated belief. You may love the concept or idea of that belief which you have conceptualized over your lifetime from many different sources. But the substance, the reality, the proof, the most important thing needed to have people believe, that they can't produce.
You may not want to condemn the child, but I think those who push belief over evidence should at least get a good kick in the ass.
Maybe religion depends up endless repetition from an early age. My parents were not so into beliefs.
What you witnessed was the moment debriefing from indoctrination occurred. She will progress quickly now from leaving the cult of "Santa Claus". She is crying for herself more than anything, for being fooled. Anger will follow. But she will be a stronger person now, less gullible hopefully. Part of growing up.
The whole Santa thing is fairly recent. Xmas far more religious previously, with St Nicholas an actual person and his life celebrated with no supernatural flying reindeer in sight until Coke got in on the act.
@rogerbenham Repetition is a favoured learning tool, not only in message but ritual.
Indoctrination is the formal teaching of doctrine so one may become an accepted and functioning member of that specific groups doctrine only. Formal is the key word ie using professional instructors and set lesson plans. Sunday School an excellent example. Military basic training another.
@puff I guess I was very lucky.I rejected conformity I was never into groups except I loved singing in choirs but when I went home the choirs never came with me except in1976 when one other came home and we did acid together. I succeeded when I broke free at university and suddenly shone.
Many years ago when "The Life of Brian" was released it caused a lot of controversy. In order to address this the BBC staged a very famous debate between John Cleese, Micheal Palin and two leading Christians, the Bishop of Southwark and Malcolm Muggeridge. Now the debate did not go well for the Christians as they had to admit they missed the 1st 20 minutes of the movie and therefore the entire plot line.
However, (and this brings us to the point of my comment) at one point Muggeridge extolled all of the great works of art that Christendom has inspired and how the movie ridiculed that inspiration. Cleese and Palin were defensive of this matter but they could have gotten more assertive. Yes, we have religion to thank for the Sistine Chappel, De Vinci's Last Supper etc. but it is a job lot. Along with all of those beautiful works of art, you have to accept the Inquisition, witch trials and the justification of slavery. Do some pretty pictures and great tunes outweigh the mass of human suffering that came with them?
Not even close. Remember, this is a con job. The art and music were USED to cheat people out of their money. And, the religion exacts a heavy toll on their consciousness which is robbed of critical thinking. It also imposes sociopathy on the whole society as well as rigid delusion.
Imagine what music and art might have been created if people had freedom of thought and expression!!! What if the Enlightenment had started 500 or a thousand years earlier?
And England has a particularly wretched history, no doubt because they had freedom from honesty and integrity as enforced by religious belief. In addition to the pogroms of Europe, King Edward I expelled all Jews from England in 1290, this done to confiscate their property and wealth.
We actually have no idea how faith inspired those works or the need to be paid. Even JSBach seemed deducated to the church but did he believe in God, the Lutheran or catholic church or raising money for his family.
Not only that, but the entire gold-plated ( or solid gold!) Decorative stuff in those "magnificent" churches was taken from the mouths of people who ate cabbages if they could get them and died at 35.
When I was in Spain and saw this, in even the smallest churches, gold & silver beyond imagining, it made me physically ill.
@annewimsey500 It was a constant source of argument in our household. Mom was Catholic Dad was atheist, I was born in Malta (navy brat). Medina Cathedral has a solid gold roof. How can you justify bling like that?
You are an emotional person who loves peace, art, traditions, and mystic atmospheres. Where can you find it? of course mostly around religions!
But keep this in mind; that's just the dull side of a keen blade. We're harming from the other side of the Same blade! that's Why we hate religion.
Simply. We can put peace, art, traditions, mystic atmospheres, and all good and bright stuff around another true topic like Humanity, Nature or Life, ...etc. Why not ?!
Oh, BTW, Christianity shares many of the same features as Mithraism (a Persian God)
[britannica.com]
" Christianity shares many of the same features as Mithraism (a Persian God)"
Wonderful!
Do I have religion? Yes!!! I love and feed from nature, Apart fron 10 years I have lived in and gloried Nature, I shared landfor 40 years with nature and with bears, moose, dear walking though I still do. But I live 1200km pr 800 miles from a 3 million city. A line drwn due north from my home crosses oe highway before reaching the Northh Pole.
Religion harms us ALL EVERY DAY!! The only way you could not see that is if you live under a rock, or with your head in the sand…..
You might consider doing some historical research on these so called “benign” religions you speak of. And while you’re at it, you might open your eyes to the intolerance and hate that religions propagate.
Sorry I 'm leaving this alone as your tone advises me that there is too great a gulf between us.
If you need any proof of how harmful religion is to us, look at the current state of the US…..
You’re right, there is a gulf between us. It’s a gulf created by the blindfold you’re wearing.
Bigoted intolerance and hate cause much harm. I’m guessing more than you care to admit…..
[yahoo.com]
Religion seriously harmed MANY people, Roger, especially young boys and girls in the Catholic Church. I hate religion for that reason. Not just the individuals who perpetrated that harm, but the system that protected those individuals and allowed them to continue harming children repeatedly. Just because my personal experience was not harmful, does not allow me to overlook the harm that was done to others.
Fair enough. I know of one friend who had been abused as an altar boy. Dead now. The historyof the Roman Catholic church had little to do with religion, much more to do with power and control. Whether ther pretended to be Christian or not, power through brutality was always the way. Trump wants to use religion for power but there is no way that he is Christian.The fantasy we have is the the nastiest of people for the nastiest of reasons with be good as our leaders.
How do you disregard the centuries of genocides and mass murders committed in the name of religion? How do you ignore the bigotry, sexism, cruelty, and hatred promoted by religions? Etc. I can't believe you don't know the drill.
I the earlies days were they religion or simply power wars? People hate thos who do not conform. I imagine that I am on a watch list for me extreme left views.
A lot of that horrible stuff was also done not in the name of religion. In the name of regarding them as sinners and savages.
I know what they did. I have no recent knowledge other that what they did with complicity with the Cananian government in theResidential schools. But as long as Xtians do not try to force their religion onto me, in my daily life I have only one big problem and that is that they do not obey the teachings they pretend to follow.
There can be and often are great things that religion can teach. Some things I learned in Parochial school still are with me. However, like life, things change and many important things (like pushing one's religion on others is a form of pride but this is totally ignored in many religious circles). The big problem with religion is it almost always becomes a form of power and, as such, tries to rule others to one way of thinking.
Thanks. Through religion great works were done, wondrous buildings, some useful teaching ... but as King HenryV111 pointed out they also sold pigs blood as blood of Christ and pieces of wood as from the cross. THey denied science. In Canada they did the most dreadful things tonative children.
@rogerbenham Whenever I see these “wondrous” buildings, I wonder how many different ways those resources could have been used to actually help people…..
@rogerbenham My life as a Catholic was benign so I stayed longer. Once, when helping a priest out he was tole we were out of 'holy water.' He got me to fill a pitcher with water and then said some words over it so it became 'holy.' All this time we thought it came from someplace special like Lourdes. What a joke. So many things like this finally made me realize it was pure BS.
@Aaron70 True but mosst of the weralthy built castles to defend themselves and wondrous cathedrals to better their odds in their heaven and to build another form of control. The betterment of the conquered peoples was of little interest. England was ruled in French for at leasr 300 years. Those Morman French still own 75% of the land. Why people love castles beats me.
The people who taught you religion didn’f hurt you.
They did hurt me.
Oh, sorry. No doubt true. I represented ruling power then.