Lighten up, Francis.

@KKGator okay, gator. You got me.

@SeaGreenEyez Is that what you have concluded? I would suggest you wait a bit longer. The court of claims is not the final arbiter. Decisions made at that level are quite often overturned on appeal.

If you're looking for information that fits your viewpoint, and then stop when you find one source, you could be mislead.

"The mayor of Louisville, Kentucky, tried to stop a church's drive-in Easter service, but on Saturday a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order overturning that effort."

The federal level has already found merit to overturn the state level at least once; which sets precedent across states.

@SeaGreenEyez I can tell you read my retort with disagreement in mind.

You say I cited Kentucky, but in reality it was a FEDERAL (capitalized because you obviously missed it the first time) case. The state is immaterial in a federal case, in case you did not know that. Federal case rulings create what is called stare decisis for all lower courts in all similar cases. Its clear you do not know how that works. You're welcome for the education.

I do not care if you name call me (trumpian). It just shows how weak your comprehension is on the matter that you have to go there. But fyi, i do not support or pay attention to trump or any president, because they do not impact my life or actions.

There are a lot of lawsuits filed right now about this very matter. I believe many people and churches are going to get paid. We will see.

As far as the orders being illegal. You are techinally correct. Executive orders apply to the executive branch, NOT to the people who are under no obligation to follow orders that violate the peoples rights protected by state and federal constitutions. Those orders DO apply to executive branch employees. But if those exec employees create rights violations in the process of enforcing those orders, recourse is theres for the people in the federal courts, as illustrated above.

That federal order was just the first step.

You are way off base here. The proper move is an emergency meeting and the enacting of a bill, which in turn, becomes a law. Exec orders are a dead give away that they know they do not have authority to do a certain thing, so they do the order and get the media to blast it to fool the uninformed. People such as yourself.

@SeaGreenEyez Sure thing, KAREN.

@SeaGreenEyez And by the way, I do not take gubment hand outs.

That's for your ilk.

Presumptuous, much?

Well some of us have but the remainder seems to be ever so content with sucking it from the bottom of the sludge pond.

The Lord not being to stand for himself ... might this come from the Lord drinking too much "falling down water"?

Yes, but it is the innocent 'collateral' damage that comes with it that concerns me.

The problem is the idiots spread the disease to everyone else.

Do such people have functional brians? Do such people even have any brains?

@anglophone They do, but they choose not to use them all that often.

They clearly aren't familiar with their Bibles! Love is the only substitute for fear.
"There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love." 1 John 4:18 (KJV)