I argued against similar in Alabama. The agreement amongst all came when I pointed out that if they put up their religious marker, they would have to allow satanic and Muslim religious text if requested and would have to spend a lot of money in court and fail or lose theirs if they refused.
That shut it down pretty quick.

Let them do it then plaster & cover it up with 2 signs - "no bill posters here" overlain by "bill posters has also got rights"

The US Constitution says that we must have a separation between church and state. Let's reinforce that wall of separation, not tear it down.

I'm sure the FFRF will be all on it.

They never learn. Who should notify the Satanist with their statue of Satan? They were rather effective in Oklahoma having a Ten Commandents monument removed from a court house grounds.

Won't happen

Not sure how they can win that with so much precedence already set. But, anymore, who knows.

Unbelievable

Fighting against this used to be fun for atheists groups as it was good for publicity/etc. It's doubtful that they do much harm provided they're subtle and perhaps came with a note explaining that it's not the law of the land/etc.

Most useless set of numb scull rules ever. About as useful as abstinence sex education.

Kurt Vonnegut, in A Man Without a Country, pointed out how very wrong-headed it is for Christians to be putting up the commandments of Moses. That's the old law, after all, which was supposedly replaced by the new covenant.

Instead, he proposed monuments of the Beatitudes. "Blessed are the meek," outside of Congress. "Blessed are the Peacemakers," in the Pentagon, and so forth.

The same issue of religious intrusion on public space would remain, of course, but it's something to think about, because the mere suggestion sheds light on their motives.

How about posting the Preamble....?

If it is a public school this is highly illegal.