Agnostic.com

96 7

So after reading some comments on an FB post, I became very curious. I hope to keep this post relatively mature as it is of a personal nature. I have a few different questions/comments to present...

  1. As someone who plans to adopt and potentially have her own, something I never realized I may need to consider is if I'll have a son circumcised. What is your opinion and why? Please don't be too graphic, I am a LADY?. Parents, I'm most interested in hearing how you made your decisions with your own sons.

  2. Do you think that majority of those that have been circumcised was due to religious reasons or just the assumed norm?

  3. I hate when women push their beliefs on this topic, while also ask men to stay out of decision-making when it comes to women's reproductive rights. Have your opinion, sure. Please don't ever argue against a Male on this topic though. Agree? Disagree?

Kassandra 6 June 29
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

96 comments (26 - 50)

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

4

To anyone who thinks there is a difference between mail and female "circumcision".

Cut that clitoris because if your mom couldn't enjoy sex then why should you.

It's like cutting off the penis foreskin so the boy's penis looks like his dads because apparently that shits important to god but in this day and age there is no reason to do it to a baby.

Religious genital mutilation, because god perfectly created you.

And if nobody is circumcised then no one with think it's weird that your not.

Just say no to arbitrary chopping up children's body parts just because it's tradition.

Fitra ?!

@Punkrockgirl77 Agreed, but while the purpose, timing and intent may be different they are still the same thing, they are both still the arbitrary chopping up children's body parts just because it's tradition.

1

Here's what I find insulting. Comparing this to female genital mutilation shows a real lack of understanding of both: both intent and how it alters the physiology and anatomy. And, on a personal note, I made the decision to have my son circumcised and it's insulting to me that you all dare to call me abusive because of my decision, that's essentially the accusation here. I am happy with my decison and what's more, my son lives a healthy life (and is soon to be married to a wonderful young lady). The procedure was completed at the hospital by a medical team with anesthesia and not by a mohel 'licking his penis' (reading through the mythology here is both entertaining and appalling). Your level of ignorance (again, lack of knowledge) goes further: it is not just Jewish people that practice circumcision of the foreskin but Muslims, too and the practice goes far beyond both of these groups (you all know there are many more religions in the world than just 3, correct? Feel I have to start with the basics with this group...).
As I said in my original post: it's a personal choice and I wouldn't recommend it for older men. It very likely began for real medical reasons (any medical person that's worked with infection r/t folds can understand this) and in some regions of the world is still medically warranted, the site I posted, the Professor Emeritus feels strongly that it is medically viable and should be routine procedure and now is most often related to traditions.
I would guess that most of you, except BagelPants come from Christian traditions without circumcision. It's an easy leap to discount all things foreign. It's an easy leap to give circumcision the evil attributes that you all do. I'd feel ashamed to express misconceptions so freely expressed here without looking internally and considering my motivation. The reason Christian countries gave up covering the cost is because it's not part of their traditions and not considered medically necessary (but, again, as my 'google' dr pointed out, with sound evidence-based research to back him up, medically prudent). There's nothing more villainous than that: it is not considered child abuse.
This has been lovely. On occasion, I enjoy a good, heated debate. Thank you all for exposing the ugly misconceptions you have (and cling to) related to circumcision.
I look forward to being part of your discussion related to female genital mutilation. Do any of you care to talk about a real, known, well-documented type of abuse that is generally done by family members, without anesthesia and with the intent of mutilating body parts? Or do you prefer to stick with topics that only require conjecture and opinion?

Arrogant & ignorant. A winning combination...

"Here's what I find insulting. Comparing this to female genital mutilation "
Well @crazycurlz, I find it insulting that you don't understand that cutting off part of a babies body is mutilation. In fact I find it quite disturbing.

Of course I am one of those wackos that thinks cutting off the tails of animals and chopping off part of their ears to make them more aesthetically pleasing to humans is also barbaric.

But you are welcome to search google for all the confirmation you want and since that is all you are looking for I am sure you will find plenty of it.

But make no mistake, cutting off part of a babies penis is mutilation and in the United States as in most places in the world there is 100% zero need for it and I can't think of a place on earth that there is a need for it as our species did without it just fine until the old testament god came along.

The timing and intent may be different than fgm, but it’s still chopping off body parts, without consent.

5

To crazycurls, WOW! a bit intense aren't you? You don't know me and you spouting off like that making questionable assumptions as if you are the supreme keeper of the book of knowledge. Your attitude is unworthy of a response

and yet, you responded...

@crazycurlz Actually telling someone that their comments are not worth responding to isn't a response so much as it is notification.

4

Oh, before I forget - as a follow up question - have you gotten your baby girl's ears pierced? If so, why? If not, why?

When and if I have a daughter she will do all piercings she wants by herself. We do not tattoo our kids why should I force her with a mark without her approval?

@Humanistheathen thanks! While I won't be making my final decision any time soon and at this moment this post is for my hypothetical children lol, I will do my best to make an update here if that day comes. As of right now, I am leaning towards not getting them circumcised. Thanks for the feedback!!

No, not as a baby, we let her decide when she was about 12/14 or there abouts. These should always be personal decisions. I got my daughter a tattoo for her 21st birthday, she now has about 30, but her body/her choice.

My wife did when our daughter was like 6 months old, didn't ask me of course but I don't suppose I would have rejected the idea.
Of course poking a tiny hole is a bit different than cutting something off. 🙂

@ThomasLevi not according to some natural practioners who see pircing as damaging to accupunture points particularly in the ear lobes.

@FrayedBear I knew I should have had her consult an acupuncturist first before having needles stuck into body parts 😉

@ThomasLevi It's not the passage through the scrotum but ....! Hehehe

8

Thank you to everyone who gave your insight, opinions, and personal experiences - except @crazycurlz.

I think I need to do more research on the topic for my own due diligence, but this thread has been helpful in aiding my decision-making. Much appreciated everyone!! (Except @crazycurlz)

Oh, Kassandra, you are BAD! 🙂

seems you're catching on very well.

@Lukian @Gareth I don't mean to lower myself to that level, but I just want to make it clear if you're going to call out people, and you cannot just give your opinion once and stop forcing your opinions down others' throats - it will be noticed.

Kassandra, I wish you well on your adoption, all children deserve a loving home. When you open up a discussion on a hot topic like circumcision, that is what you should expect: discussion, even if it becomes heated.

Ha! So funny it is you are....! 🙂

@crazycurlz thank you for the well wishes. And I love heated discussions - that is not the issue here though. Most commenters were very pleasant in their conversation- even when they disagreed. No one else commented on MULTIPLE other comments trying to argue and shove their opinions down one another's throats. You do realize that NO ONE is going to listen to you or think you have any credibility when you do that right? It's just the wrong way to approach a debate. Look up some pointers, come back, and try again. You might have better luck and won't have to coerce people then.

@Kassandra I agree. Throwing out accusations of ignorance, bias and cloaked anti-semitism is not the way to go in this community. I don't need that in my daily feed and rather than get sucked into responding I will eventually block the person, as I've done in this case.

@Gareth great idea!

1

@GoldenDoll, @Simon1, @BagelPants, @Hihi, @OroLee: By the way, the information that I've posted are not my arguments, I'm simply disseminating research carried out by others. I wanted knowledge, I did some research. It's not hard to do. The alternative is...ignorance.

Yawn.

Have you actually said who funded the research and for what purpose? Further more is it supported independently?
Attn: @GoldenDoll, @Simon1, @BagelPants, @Hihi, @OroLee

0

@GoldenDoll, @Simon1, @BagelPants, @Hihi @OroLee:
Because there are a few of you too lazy to even open the source I offered, here are just a few of the highlights:
[circinfo.net]
"CIRCUMCISION:
An Evidence-Based Appraisal
MEDICAL, HEALTH & SEXUAL
It is the intention of the present overview to provide easily-accessible, reliable, balanced information that should be of assistance to parents, medical professionals, scholars, as well as men and their sexual partners. The author is a professor emeritus in the medical faculty of the University of Sydney. He has over 46 years of scientific research experience and more than 400 research publications, including over 100 on circumcision, mostly in peer-reviewed international journals. As such he is often invited by journals, book publishers, professional organizations and the news media for his comments or other contributions.

© Professor Emeritus Brian Morris.

Circumcision - Benefits Outweigh the Risks

Dr Tom Wiswell, a respected authority in the USA was a strong opponent, but then switched camps as a result of his own research findings and the findings of others. This is what he has to say: "As a pediatrician and neonatologist, I am a child advocate and try to do what is best for children. For many years I was an outspoken opponent of circumcision ... I have gradually changed my opinion" [Wiswell, 1988; Wiswell, 1992]. This ability to keep an open mind on the issue and to make a sound judgement on the balance of all available information is to his credit ... he did change his mind!

Wiswell looked at the complication rates of having or not having circumcision performed in a study of 136,000 boys born in US army hospitals between 1980 and 1985. 100,000 were circumcised and 193 (0.19%) had complications, mostly minor, with no deaths, but of the 36,000 who were not circumcised the problems were more than ten-times higher and there were 2 deaths [Wiswell & Hachey, 1993].

A study by others found that of the 11,000 circumcisions performed at New York's Sloane Hospital in 1989, only 6 led to complications, none of which were fatal [Russell, 1993]. An early survey saw only one death amongst 566,483 baby boys circumcised in New York between 1939 and 1951 [National, 2003].

There are no deaths today from medical circumcisions in developed countries.

Very similar to the study by Wiswell above, it was found that of 354,297 infants born in Washington State from 1987-96, only 0.20% had a complication arising from their circumcision, i.e., 1 in every 476 circumcisions [Christakis et al., 2000]. Most of these ‘complications’ were minor and readily treated. It was concluded that 6 urinary tract infections could be prevented for every circumcision complication, and 2 complications can be expected for every penile cancer prevented [Christakis et al., 2000].

Problems involving the penis are encountered relatively frequently in pediatric practice [Langer & Coplen, 1998]. A retrospective study of boys aged 4 months to 12 years found uncircumcised boys exhibited significantly greater frequency of penile problems (14% vs 6%; P < 0.001) and medical visits for penile problems (10% vs 5%; P < 0.05) compared with those who were circumcised.

Risk-benefit analyses

To ascertain how much the benefits exceed the risks various risk-benefit analyses have been conducted over the years. With time, and increased high-quality evidence, the benefits to risk ratio has increased from 1 in 100 to 1 in 200 [Morris et al. 2006; Morris 2007; Morris et al. 2012 (BMC Pediatr & Open J Prevent Med), 2014 (Mayo Clin Proc), 2016 (Can J Urol), 2017 (World J Clin Pediatr)]."

The studies quoted on that one site are all over 40 years old and not even done on a large scale . You only quote from this one site which is pro- circumcision which is cognitive dissonance at its finest !!!!

@Simon1 - I think I love you! Got her right in the short & crazycurlies.

Maybe we should remove our children's teeth, you know, to prevent future tooth decay, or the need for braces, or yellowing.

Reading through that again how the hell does someone die from not having the top of his dick cut off that's just made up rubbish. Also claiming it protects someone from hiv ridiculous an errect penis is exactly the same whether it's circumsised or not . Whatever Dr claims otherwise needs his license revoked !!!

@Simon1 He's a reputable doctor. You lack understanding about the differences between evidence-based research v opinion pieces.

@crazycurlz he may be a reputable Dr in cardiovascular work but that doesn't stop him misleading others in other fields

@Simon1 And @crazycurlz.
Here is what Morris's head of department at Sydney university had to say about the paper that you reference:
"Morris believes that there is "'overwhelming' evidence to support male circumcision," and that although he does not believe that all males should undergo the procedure, Morris feels it should be in the same category as immunization.[5] He has criticised the circumcision policy[6] of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians, which he says is "not evidence-based and should be retracted,"[7] however his comments were rejected by the RACP. Morris has criticized anti-circumcision activists for what he says is the "cult-like devotion" they exhibit to their cause.[8] Morris wrote the 1999 book In Favour of Circumcision; Basil Donovan, Director of the Sydney Sexual Health Centre and a Clinical Professor in the School of Public Health and Community Medicine at the same university at which Morris was employed, the University of Sydney, criticised the book as "dangerous" and "a serious disservice to parents."[9] Other experts are also forthright in their criticism of Morris over circumcision."

12

I have three sons. None are circumcised. They’ve had zero issues. There is no “extra” cleaning or care required. We decided against it mainly because there is no medical reason. It opens up risk for infection. All of my boys were premature and though none required nicu care, they did have some minor issues and we didn’t want any added stress. It also required them to be separated from me which was against our parenting practices and beliefs at the newborn stage. And finally we just kinda thought the owner of the penis should make that decision.

Several things come to mind.. if you are a believer then god made an error.. oops.. I forgot one thing.. Secondly there is no medical reason. I was born this way.. Glad Mom made the right decision.

0

It's always fascinating to read the comments about circumcision. There's a lot of anti-circumcision myth floating around that gets picked up and spewed out with ease by people who have an agenda. It's one thing to have opinions, even if steeped in ignorance. Its another thing altogether to take your opinions and turn them into alternative facts. A lot of posters are guilty of that, equating it to female genital mutilation (shame on you, you do a discredit to the females that suffer this abuse), saying it cuts back on sensation during sex (when's the last time you really took the time to enjoy your partner and think about what your own enjoyment...it ain't about the foreskin), calling it child abuse (it's a legal, often go-to medical procedure) and the people that claim to be medical people in our midst that pass around gossipy stories are just pathetic. Learn your sources, people. As I said in my earliest post, it's likely that some very keen observers way back in Ancient times realized that pathogens often accumulate in bodily folds and can lead to infection and skin breakdown. From that bit of knowledge they worked out that Mother Nature in all her wisdom and glory added extra tissue that was non-essential and could be removed without harm to the penis functioning and aesthetics (exactly OPPOSITE to female genital mutilation. This is just one of many posts with evidence based information supporting circumcision. [circinfo.net] Written by a Dr in medical sciences, his sources include systemic reviews and meta-analysis. It also includes a statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics 2012.
Be ignorant or be informed.

You can call others ignorant all you like but when us men have the evidence in our very hands that it does do nerve damage , it does cause psychological damage and when unnecessary surgery is done on someone without permission it is abuse !! As for it protecting from urinary infections ive had them whilst younger so thats a lie . Protection from hiv you are barking mad !

I think that going around calling people you disagree with "ignorant" merely backfires on the author. I was circumcised, Fortunately no harm has come of it, but in general I'd liked to be asked before having someone take a knife to me. It's a pointless ritual, in spite of attempts to rationalise it. You're right in implying I have an agenda though - respect, reason and the rights of the individual. I'm guessing that your own agenda is that either you or people you are close to have imposed circumcision on their own babies and you are desperate to defend the practice for that reason. I can't think of why else you are being so rude to people on this subject.
[Edit] Reading your subsequent posts, I see this is indeed the case.

Those "very keen observers in ancient times" - oh yeah. The ones who invented religion to explain what they couldn't understand. And would probably have burned you & I at the stake for having an opinion which wasn't theirs. They'd be the same ones who decided the foreskin was an evolutionary mistake. I despair at your pseudo-logic. Go on, make up some more fairy stories for us please.

@GoldenDoll This is unsurprising. Both of you presented with credible sources continue to cling to your ignorance. Ignorance is simply the lack of knowledge. At least the two of you are consistent.

@crazycurlz Have you ever even seen a girl with her clitoris cut off? I have. Your ignorance is stupefying. Your 'knowledge' is non existent.

There's nothing aesthetically displeasing about an uncircumcised penis.

Hanging was also legal until recently in many countries. China and USA remain the leading employers of the death penalty. One probably for body parts, one probably for religious reasons.

10

After reading about female genital mutilation, I decided I couldn't deliberately cut off a piece of my son's body for no reason other than "to look like someone else".
This decision was cemented by my sister (an MD, in Sweden, who had NEVER seen a male patient who had wanted one, almost never seen a man with one, and never been asked to performed one herself; she said there was absolutely NO medical reason for it and most of Europe doesn't do it).
Just in case I wasn't 100% sure of my decision, my nephew was born a couple of months before my son; he had a traditional bris (circumcision with a Jewish ceremony), and they cut off too much (!!!!) - he ended up with a large wound which took much longer to heal than expected, constantly stuck to his diaper (causing him SCREAMING pain when he was changed I& the scab was repeatedly pulled off), and put him at risk for VERY serious infections (they were lucky, they caught each one before it got serious) - the whole thing was absolute torture to that infant.
Meanwhile, my son is 23, autistic (on the moderate to severe side, not the "mild" version), and has NEVER had a single issue with his penis. We taught him to clean himself when he bathed, and he does. If a disabled child can learn to keep himself clean, anyone can.

My son is autistic, too (aspergers), uncircumcised, and has never had any problems.

5

Like female vaginal mutilation it is not necessary to be done on male children ! Assumed norms ,men have no right to what a woman does with her body , i am amused that Texas has a law limiting number of dildos to 6

Mets Level 6 June 29, 2018

its' not like female genital mutilation. it's circumcision.

@crazycurlz it’s male genital mutilation.
Just because it’s the norm doesn’t make it ok

@crazycurlz unnecessary surgery is mutilation

@BagelPants and @Simon1 you can say it as much as you want to. Your alternative facts are just that. Hope you'll grow a little and reconsider your sources.

There is a limit on dildos in Texas?!?!?? ??

Thank you for your comment.

@crazycurlz and what is mutilation?

@crazycurlz I think @BagelPants and @Simon1 are in a more informed position than you since htey speak from personal experience. Never had a problem with my four boys. If it aint broke.....don't fix it. Besides this, anyone who think this doesn't hurt a newborn babe is out of their mind. Let your children decide for themselves about what surgery, piercings, tattoos they want when they are of age

@crazycurlz "its' not like female genital mutilation. it's circumcision."
If your parents cut off part of your ear or your nose it's mutilation, giving it a name does not change what it is. In todays society it is no different than what we do to dogs to give them the appearance we've grown accustom to.
Let the man decide what he wants cut off, not his parents.
And yes, it is exactly like female genital mutilation, i't intention was to keep the kids from masturbating.

And did you know that in Jewish tradition a Moyal, who is not a doctor, does the bird and uses his mouth the clean the wound, And I say wound because cutting of part of a penis is inflicting a wound. And many of these religious men have spread venereal disease to the babies by following this practice.

It is an archaic practice and doing it to babies is wrong.
And if you want to make the argument that it helps prevent sexually transmitted diseases, I don't think too many babies are fucking anyone yet. They have their whole life to cut off a piece of their penis for health reasons.

@ThomasLevi again, opinion. I am not arguing about STDs, haven't mentioned that. It's Mohel and not Moyal and where the hell you come up with your crap about cleaning the wound with his mouth is just disgusting alternative facts.

@crazycurlz OK TRump, here is your alternative fact - [abcnews.go.com]

Because obviously you have all the facts and are right about everything.
By the way, religion is disgusting and so is cutting off part of a babies penis, even if you think it's for their own good, because it's not.

@crazycurlz "Your alternative facts"

Welcome to Trumps Merica where reality can be one sided.

Well someone is right, and she just knows it! She's also here to inform the ignorant which is, apparantly, anyone who does not agree with her. She's most likely better informed on other subjects, too, but, then again, I'm probably ignorant anyway so, don't listen to me. Keep calm, and carry on!

And there I was taught that Texas did and had everything biggest and best?
LMAO ROFL

7

Also as father neither of my two boys are NOT circumcised and we have never had a problem health wise.

We considered the religious aspect as we were both identifying as Christian at the time, but decided against it based upon the ideology of why it even existed in the first place, coupled with there being no medical value.. we just couldn't cut part of our sons dick off.. if that makes sense.

4

Didn't have my son circumcised. if we are born with something, it is there for a reason. Another example of human tendency to try to change nature. And this is from religious thought.

Bullshit. Mother Nature screws up all the time. We have medical procedures for removing almost all failed body parts including genital reproductive organs (the uterus and ovaries with hysterectomy- major surgery, gall bladder and other excess folds with weight reduction surgeries). Believing that a higher being (Mother Nature) is omnipotent and omniscient and always right...I'd say THAT is from religious thought.

@crazycurlz yes we have medical procedures for removing FAILED body parts. Foreskin hasn’t failed a day old infant.

I'm sorry that your post attracted such an abusive response.

@Marcie1974 then you miss the point.

@crazycurlz you have a point?

6

The foreskin of the penis is essentially the penis's version of a clitoris and along with it, its sensitivity.

There are SOME medical reasons for circumcision, but as far as it been necessary it is not.

Personal preference being one thing, but if you DON'T then they can always make the decision for themselves later in life if they have the medical need or aesthetic want.

No no no. The clitoris is the equivalent of the whole penis - the pleasure organ.

6

I was with someone who said that not being circumcised made sex much more pleasurable. Not that you can compare if you only know one way or another. But he certainly was happy that his parents made the decision not to circumcise him (it's interesting that you have to make the decision NOT to do something, since doing it seems to have been the default for so many years).

Hihi Level 6 June 29, 2018
2

Seriously, what is the difference between this and female genital mutilation?

Hihi Level 6 June 29, 2018

From what I understand a man will lose some feeling whilst a woman will lose all feeling .

huge difference.

@Hihi. It’s same as male vs rape it’s not the same thing. /s

As a woman, you would be unable to have an orgasm. With a man, removing foreskin does not remove the ability to have an orgasm. The sexual 'release' for men and women being so different is the reason for the terms to be different, i believe. I'm not a doctor, though.

there's so much ignorance in the comparison, I don't even know where to start. you do a real disservice to victims of femal genital mutilation in not recognizing the horror they go through: 1. it's not a procedure, there is no process to it, nothing to prevent infection or loss of life 2. generally it's considered an act of violence: a woman is suspected of or has perpetrated a cultural sex crime 3. it both mutilates and removes sensation and organs vital for function and enjoyment. my god, if you're going to make this kind of leap...know what your discussing.

@crazycurlz Some people might say that calling my son autistic would be doing a disservice to severely autistic people. There is a HUGE difference between him and someone who rocks back and forth completely dissociated with the world. But he is still autistic.

There is a history of doing this to boys with no anesthesia. Cutting is cutting.

@Hihi hmmm... autism is a spectrum. Not sure how that relates to this discussion.

@Simon1 not totally true Simon. She still has her G spot and pelvic floor muscles to say nothing of the skin between vagina entrance and anus together with her anus. I have trained women to have orgasm simply from having their nose licked. I have never attempted it with someone who has never experienced orgasm or suffers from the trauma of rape or female genital mutilation.

4

I don't know why I wasn't circumsized, but I wasn't. My oldest brother was and I don't recall whether my other two brothers were or not. I feel I was very fortunate after reading how this procedure is now considered by many if not most medical professionals as barbaric, torturous, and completely non essential.

medical professionals don't use the terms barbaric, or torturous to describe this procedure. you're giving an opinion

@crazycurlz labotimis were never described as barbaric or the use of leeches for headaches they are now times change !!

@Simon1 bless you for the superficial, but enthusiastic effort you put into defending your position. your brain wasn't born with an encyclopedia (neither was mine)...it's okay to look to other sources for information.

@crazycurlz But I believe it was a medical opinion by a medical professional, regardless of what you believe, but thanks for offering YOUR opinion.

@crazycurlz you I suggest are not talking to the right doctors. Of course I doubt that working in a Jewish hospital that you would encounter any right minded or unbiased doctors would you?

5

My son is not circumcised. I do not see the point - cut skin off my kid? Why?

My husband would probably have won the argument if he really felt it was important. In our case, my kid had two surgeries after birth and was 40 days old before he left the hospital. They asked right before we were about to take him home if 'by the way' do we want to circumcise him. Um, no thanks. He's been through enough.

Hihi Level 6 June 29, 2018

It's perfectly fine to make decisions for yourself and your family. I can respect that. But, the leaps you make, comparing it to female genital mutilation, for instance, are inexcusable.

@crazycurlz I don't want to be demeaning, but you remind me of a Christian.

@Kassandra this is a pretty important topic and requires discussion even if it becomes heated. I understand that by calling me a 'Christian' you think you are offending me, but, I have many Christian friends I admire and respect.

5

i do not have children.... I am male..... it started with the Egyptians, then the Hebrews as a way of marking their cattle, I mean people...... no i do not like to be marked. I was not asked if I wanted my foreskin removed. I would like to have it back, but I am 43 and that is impossible, I never forgave my mother!!

Etre Level 7 June 29, 2018

Just remembered and must add that I did have my son circumcised, and this was 58 years ago, a decision I now greatly regret.

it started as a means to prevent infection, much as what is happening in Africa today. Then it became tradition.

@crazycurlz you keep refering to africa who also belive that condoms cause aids due to the misinformation given to them by the catnolics and now thy have the highest infection of aids !!!

@crazycurlz
Srry, it started with the Egyptians then the Hebrews. Unless you are talking about modern society, and yes that is the reason they propagate.

@Simon1 I think by now I am beginning to feel sorry for you.

2

Not being a man, I asked my husband, and son's father, what he would do. As he had seen a urologist previously and they had a decent rapport, he called the doc and asked him if there was a medical reason for or against. The doctor said no, not unless there was a family history of issues in that area (no pun intended). He did mention the common argument of "looking like Daddy" and that there are some religious reasons. Of course, he added that if there are problems when he gets older, it would be much more unpleasant to have to do it at that point. (spoken from the point of a Dr) Not knowing many men who were uncircumcised 35 years ago, my husband decided to to have the procedure done.

The things is.. it would not be more unpleasant as an adult.. an adult would just be able to tell you how unpleasant it was with more gusto and panache.

@KC_TheOne giving birth is unpleasant as well. As is any surgery. I think they’d survive.

1

I'm glad I was and have heard guys wish that they had been.

But not wish so much that they would actually have it done?

@Gareth Good question. I had a vasectomy, and hated it. It was painful and weird because I was awake and could watch. Felt the tugging and snipping. It was kind of horrifying. I can feel the lumps and it occasionally causes me pain to this day. If I wasn’t circumcised when I was a baby I definitely would not do it now. Not that it would be painful necessarily, as they claim it isn’t, but just thinking about it now doesn’t work for me. That’s why I am glad I had it done and probably the same reason one might wish they had it done early on.

I’m sure there are lots of disfigured people for instance, that would like to look differently, but choose not to go under the knife just for psychological fear alone, but not necessarily that it will be painful. So when it’s just a matter of cosmetics, you have to weigh out the pros and cons. Money may also be an issue.

@Gareth Yeah, I believe our health care covered circumcision here in Canada before, but now treats as a cosmetic surgery that you have to pay for yourself.

@nastynifty I am uncircumcised and I had a vasectomy. The latter was decidedly NOT painful. Perhaps your doctor wasn't up to much.
Most of Europe, except for areas with Jewish or Muslim communities, does not go in for circumcision. Perhaps a decent study should compare Europeans against Americans in this regard.

@Petter Apparently Canada doesn’t circumcise for free anymore and if you want it done it is around $300 Canadian dollars. I’m absolutely aware that a vasectomy isn’t supposed to hurt, but mine did and I know another person who went through a similar experience as me. To be fair, apparently my surgeon was known to be a bit of a butcher and was actually fired due to his record, but that means it isn’t always painless regardless of what they say..perhaps a good reason to get it done at birth if it’s to be done at all.

5

I had my son circumcised because I never even thought of the issue. I thought that it was just what you did. That was 32 years ago. If I were to have a son now, and having heard arguments against it I wouldn't have it done.

That was reasoning also. The first time I saw an uncircumcised penis I actually said. "Eww, what's wrong with it?"

Totally killed the mood.

@PhoebeCat and I feel just the opposite. As in all things, it's okay to have differences.

@crazycurlz you're free to prefer circumcised penises (EDIT: among your own sex partners).

That doesn't mean you should encourage other parents to cut any part of their boys' penises off, without their consent, absent medical necessity.

0

This says it well...

Seriously? A little about adam conover, wiki: '...describe himself as "the only member of the family without a Ph.D."[5] In 2000, he graduated from Shoreham-Wading River High School, where he first became interested in the performing arts.[6] He then attended Bard College, where, in 2002, he became an active member of the sketch comedy group Olde English.[7] In 2004,[8] he earned a Bachelor's degree in philosophy from Bard College.[3]'

@OroLee it sounded like she was going to say something attacking him, but then just mentioned his schooling. I'm confused. Why is his training important? He is part of a production and, independent of that, the validity of is argument seems intact. Why does information about him in particular have relevance?

0

I had it done at 5 or 6 due to infections in that area. If the father has it, the son should have it so they “look” the same.

Having you penis look like your fathers penis makes about as much sense and forcing your son to get the same haircut and wear the same cloths all his life. Except for the fact that hopefully the majority of people will not see both penises so really the "look" the same argument is pretty silly. I don't really remember seeing my fathers penis, I'm sure I have and I know he is circumcised but I don't know it from seeing it.

Well that's the most ridiculous reason I've heard so far. What if you son doesn't want to look the same as you???

@Storybook you have a penis?

@Storybook - do you have a penis?

@Storybook, @GoldenDoll - do you have a penis? And you have as much right to judge as a man has to judge a woman about her body?

@ThomasLevi - it was a conscious decision based upon my past medical history and that isn’t rediculous. The nice thing about choices and decisions and opinions - everyone has the right to make them.

@Storybook - I don’t get offended on social media, or towards to many things in the real world for that matter. I choose not to let people’s opinions offend me; only use it as input for decision making if I respect that individual and ask for their opinion on the matter.

@CalvinJoe Having a circumcision because an infection or even if you think it will prevent something is perfectly rational. Having one because you want your penis to look like your fathers I hope you can understand sound a bit weird.
Now most fathers will have their baby boys get circumcised for that reason but if he had decided at 5 or 6 to take you for a circumcision so your penis would look like his, that would be weird. IMO of course.

1

I had it done at 5 or 6 due to infections in that area. If the father has it, the son should have it so they “look” the same.

I can't believe you said that. And twice. It's still ridiculous.

@GoldenDoll hahaha

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:118228
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.