Wow, thanks for posting!

I don’t see it as a competition really. I’m just curious as to how men and women behave differently. Men are traditionally expected to make the first move. I was kind of curious if, in this more enlightened community, if things would be more even.

@TimWhitaker Why would it be? Men are hard-wired to be predators, while women are the choosers. But there are many women here with elevated male hormones who also are aggressive in courtship.

You don't even have a profile photo of your face-not wise on a dating website.

Thanks! Looks the the data are all trending one way!

@TimWhitaker but if you were to ask me how many of my visitors are willing to chat with me, after a relatively short pause, I would say 3 maybe 4. Lol

@Kojaksmom lol I hear ya. Good to be selective.

Thanks for posting!

Thanks for posting. About how long have you been on here?

@TimWhitaker No problem. I joined on 9th Feb this year

To be complete: 6000 posts (19413 likes), 11682 comments (27194 likes), 9182 replies (15627 likes)

Okay now it makes sense. Phew. Though that has got to be hovers because even dividing by a full year - that is a ton of traffic?

And there goes my theory about avatars.

@RavenCT I rotate about 4 of them every few weeks. But, I do have real photos on my Profile Page.

@RavenCT Also, I must be uglier than I thought! I've been on here since December of last year, have had 2 sort of dates with 2 different women & have absolutely no one interested in me at all right now! I just saw a post where someone just announced they've found someone here, I must be well & truly lost!

@RavenCT I'm only loved for my brain, I feel like such a piece of grey matter!

@RavenCT Seems I'm getting about, by a very rough estimate, 60% hovers to 40% actual views.

@RavenCT And actual "views" number doesn't match that, tho, on the Visitor # in the Profile info it says 1072! Way different from the number on the Agnostic.com listing.

@phxbillcee You obviously need to find a Sapiosexual who will love you for you brains! (No not like a zombie). (It's probably what you're looking for anyway as a good guess - a lot of people are).

You aren't ugly. I think distance is still an issue for a lot of folks.

And at least you are actively LOOKING! That's half the battle.

I've been here since last October... thanks for the inferiority complex dear! You're a higher level in all points levels... sigh.

@RavenCT You are not inferior in ANY way! I just approach things differently, & have less of a life than you do!
I don't think I'm looking that much right now. I've had two disappointments in quick order that hurt more than they probably should have. I have a few good friends here & a number of great 'compatriots', so I should be happy with that. I guess I'm more or less resigned, tho I still have a spark of hope.
& thanks for the 'not ugly', tho it wasn't the ringing endorsement I was fishing for!!! LOL!

@phxbillcee You want a "Gorgeous hunk of burning love" from a photo? I don't trust photos. Have you seen the effects some use? rofl

(((Bill)))

@RavenCT If I was using 'effects', do you really think those would be the results!!!

Those are some crazy number. ? The power of posting.

Ah come on, post your stats, we need more data.

It's for science! Plus I went to your profile and you HIDE IT! Gees...

@RavenCT I hide a lot of stuff that could be used against me? And to keep it from being used in a competitive nature.

@JustKip yep

lmao 4-digits with a cat profile pic. Damn we are a thirsty lot!

@TimWhitaker BTW my cats do accidental hovers over profiles all of the time... I'm not stalking anyone it's my cats!

2254! Wow!