The ethics of eating animals. Some argue that god granted man dominion over all living things. Others point out that most animals wouldn’t even be alive it it were not for the fact they were bred to be eaten so that gives them purpose.
Perhaps we can have a dialogue about the ethics of eating meat (cows, pigs, fowl, exotic animals, dogs, cats).
All I know is that its kinda a family tradition...and while I don't have a problem with the thought of eating most any kind of animal, I would have a really hard time eating most any animal I had befriended. Was brought up with the moral that killing anything should at least have the justification of defense, or subsistance, and that makes sense to me.
Yeah, "befriending" seems to add another ethical dimension--like a predator grooming a child to be abused.
@Wallace that is a fairly twisted way to think about "befriending".
@HankSherman He meant befriending something you were planning to kill and eat.
@JeffMurray what part of his comment conveyed that to you???
@HankSherman You can ask him if that's how he meant it, but it read like that to me, clear as day.
The italicized part is what I heard in my head:
"Yeah, 'befriending' an animal you're going to eat seems to add another ethical dimension much worse than just killing and eating it --like a predator grooming a child to be abused."
@JeffMurray I see
I no longer eat much meat, but sometimes I do, and I enjoy it.
That said, I don't think I have any business telling anyone else what they "should" or "shouldn't" eat, or why.
Vegans, vegetarians, and everyone else are free to do whatever they please.
As long as they don't get all preachy about it.
I have been a vegetarian for many years ,but being a vegetarian is a option that many on this planet do not have the luxury of choosing for a variety of reasons especially developing countries..
I am a livestock farmer, small scale and my animals are loved and cared for and sent to humane slaughter. Factory farms are another story. I do eat meat as part of my meal and not as the star of it. I also eat a lot of meals with no meat whatsoever. As Angloph pointed out, we are Omnivores and we do need protein. Soybean is the only complete protein and you need all of the various parts to be healthy. Meat gives a lot of healthy benefits. I am against factory farms as I believe an animal should have a happy healthy life if it is going to give that up to feed us.
Sorry. I am a doctor. Soy protein is very unhealthy and incomplete. A healthy person never puts any soy based food in their body including tofu.
So are bugs included? I don't mean to be confrontational at all and really wonder - Is meat an ethical issue because animal pain is observable to us and pain is something we share and avoid? If not and the ethics are around taking life, then what exempts plant life? We have to eat, so ethically, where do you draw the line? I can understand an injunction on taking any life as I can see life as an ethically axiomatic good, but then all that leaves is fallen fruit and already dead animals, which is not workable. The day that all food can be produced in a lab from material that was never living - in a cost effictive way - then I might adopt the "meat is unethical" position. Extended to all living things. Until then I feel that seeing meat as not ethical would be based upon a contrivance of subjective appearances which some may not share.
And I am ignoring the microscopic in this argument. Any injunction against taking microscopic life would make movement, including and especially bathing, impossible.
Humans evolved to eat meat. Our teeth and digestive systems are testament to it.
Humans are omnivores not carnivores and meat was originally a very small part of our diet.
Eating too much red meat is detrimental to our health particularly meat from farmed animals which has a high fat percentage.
@Moravian I never said anything about humans being solely carnivores or making a statement on how much meat we should eat. Besides, I have known quite a few women who lived on a vegetarian diet and had problems not having regular menstruation cycles. When they started eating meat again, their flows came back and they felt better
@Heavykevy1985 Human teeth are not designed for eating meat but for grinding nuts grains and roots and are quite different from carnivores teeth. True the digestive system has adapted to cope with meat but too much is unhealthy.
A true vegan diet can be deficient in particularly vitamin B12 and they may need supplaments but I have vegan friends who are among the healthiest people I know.
@Moravian no. We have canines are designed to grip and shred meat. Ever hear of Hunter-gatherers?
@Heavykevy1985 Yes, they had a proportion of meat in their diet but nothing like the percentage that most people in developed countries eat today. Hence the obesity epidemic in many countries.
It is thought that a diet higher in animal protein and fat was instrumental in increasing the brain size of mans early ancestors but this is more likely to be have been from shellfish than animals.
Have you tried eating raw meat with your human canines ?.
@Moravian, @Heavykevy1985 I always find this debate interesting even if it doesn't go anywhere. I do think it's odd that we can digest almost all of an animal, yet we can't digest the most prevalent energy storage method in the plant world, cellulose, at all.
@JeffMurray Good point but it does serve a useful purpose in helping to carry waste through the digestive system.
@Moravian You'll still poop without it. I promise.
@JeffMurray Have you ever smelt the breath of someone on the Atkins diet ?.Yuk.
@Moravian That's a different argument altogether. That is a discussion about not eating carbs causing your body to go into ketosis, instead of not eating vegetables.
@JeffMurray [statnews.com]
Sure ,you can poop alright, with a bit of help
@Moravian Point taken. But we're not exactly bedridden cancer patients easing the pain with tons of opiates either.
@JeffMurray I think the moral of the story is. Don't date a heroin user. Apparently it makes the user constipated but when the effect of the drug wears of the result can be instantaneous and explosive.
@Moravian That is true. Saw it with my own eyes. Plus they'll steal your Magic cards for drug money.
@Moravian the Hunter-gatherers did not eat a lot deep fat fried or processed food with lots of sugar and salt
@Moravian also, those living in the interior did not have as much access to shellfish. The Neanderthal diet was 80% meat, which Europeans trace some of their DNA to
@Heavykevy1985 [psychologytoday.com]
There is obviously a lot of speculation but this article is very interesting, Early hominids probably had a diet similar to chimpanzees with only occasional meat in their diet.I think one of the most interesting comments is about the adaptability of homo sapiens to eat virtually anything. A good example is the Inuit people who happily survived on animals and seafood and are now suffering from ill health due to the increase of processed Western food in their diet.
@Moravian as in processed food. I am sure if the Inuits had access to beef, chicken, pork, etc., probably would not have to hunt and fish so much. Same thing happened in Greece. Do I think that humans should eat less meat and more vegetables? Sure. I think that having a well-rounded diet is important. I usually cook my meals. I try to avoid fast food. Nonetheless, I do think that there are nutritional benefits to eating meat including certain proteins in higher amounts that you cannot obtain from other foods.
@SpikeTalon Neanderthal bones had high amounts of nitrogen in them. That is like due to a high-protein consisting of lots of meat
If I could eat lab grown meat that had the same nutritional value as normal meat i would.
I agree about eating lab meat.
I'm more concerned with taste. Lab grown meat that tastes like real meat then we can start having a discussion. There are still things you probably can't substitute, like a nice rack of baby back ribs.
There's nothing in eating meat. The problem is more the ways animals are bred to be eaten. Nothing is made in a sustainable manner, it's made to be profitable. In my opinion, that's the core question of it all.
I think you are right to make this the point.
Then there is also the mindless consumption of all foods. Many indigenous peoples who hunted a killed for their food made efforts to use every part of the animal and to express gratitude for the sacrifice the animal made.
Gods had nothing to do with humans eating meat. Meat is protein. Humans are animals that need protein. The animals that you mentioned, the ones that we have selectively bred, have been bred to be more docile and more stupid than their ancestors so humans could obtain them more easier.
Ethics? Well, most people don't want to think about how an animal dies, nor get their own hands bloody anymore. I don't hunt because I never liked taking a life; but I can, and I have in the past. Animals eat animals. I may fear being hunted by another apex predator, but I don't blame that animal. Tribal people don't have an ethical dilemma with killing and eating animals. I, too, don't have a problem eating most meats. I do think animals should not needlessly suffer so I won't eat veal or liver patte. I believe cruelty to animals is wrong; I also know that statistically those who hurt animals for pleasure are more likely to hurt another human.
Now, for a real leap, if it came down to survival, I believe humans would eat other humans. I took Naval law in the early 80's (so not sure this is still true) and if shipwrecked, it is legal to eat those that die. Up until the late 1800's it used to be legal to draw straws when near starvation occurred (that was finally changed after a case of, did these guys wait long enough). Anyway, I rambled long enough.
Something must be said about MONSANTO, the billion dollar company that is poisoning our soil and our seeds and subsequently, the food we all eat. Poison is their product, such as Agent Orange in the war with Viet Nam. In their quest to eliminate weeds and pests, they have only created super weeds and super bugs. They monkey with seeds to make them open to receiving lots of their glyphosate, a cancer-causing insecticide that permeates our food supply. Already there have been successfull suits for millions in the courts for having caused cancer. DON'T BUY AND USE THEIR ROUNDUP ON YOUR LAWNS. Then these nasty greed mongers actually demand that farmers only use their seeds and throw away any excess so that they have to keep buying this garbage every year. In India there has been an epidemic of suicides by farmers who were caught up in their snare. The country of Paraguay, a land locked country in South America, was once verdant, richly green, until Monsanto sold them on using their new "scientific" products. Green turned to brown. They destroyed the richness of this country's agriculture. Monsanto is banned in many countries in Europe. Why not here? The answer is money and bribery and Bill Gates. My advice: EAT ORGANIC. It's your best bet even though it can't be perfect.
This is an example of why I point out the difference between SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY. They snow everyone by claiming this is science. It is Technology that bastardizes science. Let's get very clear in our thinking so that those greed mongers can't confuse us!!!
It makes me so angry when I see these products still on the shelves. And our food is no longer nutrient rich because of these products. It’s so infuriating
I think that Monsanto has now been offloaded to the German competition Bayer because of the weight of claims now being made against them.
[britannica.com]
The following link is of a report by Shane Dowling "Why hire a lawyer when you can buy a judge" on his Kangaroo Court newsite written on the subject two years ago.
[kangaroocourtofaustralia.com]
If we don’t eat cows what are we going to do with all this grass? Cows are essentially the only critter capable of converting grass and forages into something edible for us humans.
Although I enjoy the occasional steak I always buy from a local butcher. We will soon be seeing imported US beef in our supermarkets along with the chlorinated chicken. Much of the beef from cows raised of feedlots where they never see a blade of grass and are pumped full of antibiotics, No thanks.
Getting protein from cows fed on grass and soya is very inefficient and millions of cows worldwide are producing millions of tons of methane which as we know is a much more potent greenhouse gas than CO2
@Moravian I'm not sure why, but I think grass-fed beef is gross. Give me the corn packed shit from the farms and let me die of a heart attack ASAP.
@JeffMurray Grass fed beef doesn’t taste as good but it’s a lot better for you health wise. I think if we worked on our breeding programs we could improve the tastes of grass fed beef. I have eaten some grass fed beef that was quite good.
@Trajan61 If I was worried about what was better for me though there's about a million things I wouldn't eat...
I see no ethics in the eating of animals, only the care of them while they are being raised for slaughter. That is where my objection comes into it.
Humans are omnivores so there's no ethical question about eating what is natural to our species. We don't question the ethics of lions or predatory birds or fish or any other creature that eats other animals so why make us special. I do object to mistreatment of animals, whether they are wild, domesticated or a food source. It's not humane of us to make their lives miserable.
When I raised animals on the farm (calves, lambs, goats) for food or for pets (rabbits, cats, dogs, reptiles ect.) our animals ate the best feed, had the best living habitat and the best vet care. We nurtured them lovingly even though some were destined for slaughter. They ate before we did and their quality of life was as good as our own. Ethical animal husbandry is doable, even on a grand scale. It will cost more but it's still doable.
Don't even need to look at the report. I passed that issue over 20 years ago. Eating is a sensuous experience. It includes most of not all the senses. We, here in the 21st century do not need to eat something that is horrible for the environment, violent for the animals and bad for our bodies. For me to eat meat would add an unacceptable level of guilt. Pleasure should not include guilt and pain to other sentient beings.
Well, don't forget, the farming of vegetables harms animals, too...
Humans have evolved to be omnivores. I see introducing ethics into the discussion as being diversionary.
However, if you were to raise the topic of animal husbandry, I would give you quite a different response.
Fair enough but to clarify a bit, I was initially asking because of the Asian markets where they eat dog and monkey brains. One person I know was sickened to witness a long table set with what looked like domes at each place setting. At once, all domes were removed. I can’t go on as it is horrific. In any case, the ethics of eating animals includes these instances as well as factory farms that are responsible for not only the abuse of animals but also pollute water and air.
@HelenRoseBuck I see your point. Thanks for sharing.
@HelenRoseBuck I have no problem with people eating various animals that many use for pets. I eat rabbit and have kept rabbits as pets. My objection is the lie of buying a "pet" and claiming you'll make it a pet and then taking it home to eat it or feed it to other animals. That does happen and it is wrong. Intentions matter.
If people want to eat cats or dogs that's fine but don't lie and say you'll make it your pet or steal someone else's pet.
There still are animals about who regard (wo)man as food. A discussion on the ethics of meat eating, yes please!
Gone are the days of the small family farms that cared for their animals before they slaughtered them for the table. First, the way commercial farming treats these animals is beyond disgraceful. We pay the price when we eat animals that have been tortured and living in their own excrement. I refuse to support this. Secondly, whether or not to become a vegetarian or vegan...at least it is healthier to eat much less flesh food. The extreme demand for meat leads to clogged arteries and shortened lives...to say nothing of the damage done to the planet. As for fish, we are over fishing so that we are depleting the supply. Add that to the wanton polluting of our oceans that are turning from alkaline to acid, overrun with lice from too much farmed fish...What a mess. And nothin is worse than eating farmed fish. You should see the gray corpses loaded with lice that we eat before they are painted pink. Vegans are healthier people. And there is much that can be learned from researching vegan sources of protein and B 12 plus creative ways to prepare all sorts of vegetables and salads plus fruits. All those antioxidants...Wow! what a feast!!!!.
Whatever ethics one applies to eating animals, can also be applied to plants.
There’s a level of hypocrisy, to discuss.
@Gwendolyn2018 so the criteria is: consider living things only with eyes?
Protein is also in vegetables, nuts and fruits. But I still enjoy a medium rare steak at Ruth’s Chris once in a great while!
Note 26.35 grams = 1 ounce
The protein in plants is very different and much less bioavailable to us and things like kidney beans and pea protein is not anywhere as healthy. Mammals need protein suitable for animals. Ever see a hungry lion eat soy beans or any plant? Our brain is about 60% fat including about 25% cholesterol. Creating new memory is dependent on cholesterol. Taking a statin cause amnesia in some people by interfering with cholesterol chemistry.
@Healthydoc70 Ever seen a cow eat another cow ?. We did here 20 odd years ago when it was common to feed cows with animal protein. This resulted in the "mad cow disease" epidemic when millions of animals were slaughtered and the practice is now illegal
Possibly the best steak I have had in my life was at the Ruth’s Chris in Hong Kong. Phenomenal. lol
@Moravian Do you have a point? Cows are herbivores, read vegetarians. If you feed them grains or animal proteins they get sick. Herbivores exist to convert the energy in plants to meat and milk to feed omnivores and carnivores. Lions eat meat because they must. You will never see a hungry female lion run into a soy patch and chow down in order to create milk for her young. An Octopus, a squid, a sperm whale, a killer whale and a tuna fish among many others are carnivores and won't eat sea weed no matter how hungry.
@Healthydoc70 not sure if your question was for me. But, the only point I had initially was to ask for others’ to weigh in on the ethics of eating animals. Some great discussion has come of it.
@Healthydoc70 Do I have a point ?. OK I will put it in simpler language. Cows fed on a diet containing animal protein, particularly brains and spinal cords of other cows can develop bovine spongiform encephalitis (mad cow disease) as happened in the UK some 20 years ago. Tens of thousands of cows were destroyed and the practice was made illegal.
There were a few cases of Creutzfeldt Jacob disease in humans which were thought to have been caused by eating infected beef and there was a worry that this would become more common but fortunately this has not materialised.
Cows in feedlots in the USA are fed a diet containing a high proportion of grains including barley,soya,chick peas and also potatoes. As you say this is not the animals natural diet and the cattle suffer ill health. This is controlled by giving the cattle antibiotics.
Under Boris's great trade deal with the USA we are likely to see this meat in our supermarkets soon. I for one will not be buying it.
@Moravian I know all about his. You write with an insulting arrogance. I have an IQ above 30, thank you. You don't know me, so you write down to me.
@Healthydoc70 Well, I tend to respond as I am addressed. Do I have a point etc.
I visited a chicken farm that took delivery of hatchlings and placed them in expandable pens that were wet to fit just the hatchlings with a small amount of space left over. I was told by the owner they were fed hormones along with the scientifically adjusted diets of grains. The chickens would row and as they did the enclosure would be expanded until the chickens were quite large. He laughed and said they resembled basketballs with feathers; they couldn’t even walk as they kept tipping over. Then their customer, in this case, pilgrims pride, would give them a pick up date. The hormones would be eliminated from their diet and about 2 weeks later a big semi would cart off all the chickens to be slaughtered.
This was many years ago. It took me a long time before I could eat any fowl again. The smell of the place was really disgusting too.
The poultry that I keep seem to enjoy my company. Some prefer to eat from the ground, others prefer to eat from my hand. The duck warble and the drakes hiss, and both gender wag their tails in delight when being hand-fed.
(Hissing in drakes is not aggression. Drakes use quite different signals to indicate aggression, fortunately never aimed at me.)
@K9Kohle789 Their "humane" treatment consists of hanging the animal upside down and opening up an artery to let it bleed out to death. It takes them many minutes to actually die. This is not humane in my opinion,