You also have to realise that out prime minister is a religious idiot. Ergo anything against his doctrine ill be considered bad

It's being run on a platform of overstepping the mark of decency, rather than as a religious objection, which means there are different standards to meet regarding legitimacy. Allowing it to continue doesn't mean it won't still get thrown out though. Personally, I'm conflicted in that although I have no problem with what was said, there are better ways to have said it and Sandilands is nothing but a limp dick. I'd call him a c#nt but they're useful while a limp dick is good for nothing. Sandilands is a "shock" jock, aspiring to be as big an arsehole as alan jone, getting notoriety by abusing the more vulnerable people in our society, and I'd love to see him get his comeuppance.

I guess it's the same mentality as Muslims being terribly offended by jokes about Allah and Muhammad.

Unbelievable

Well, in the US you can sue anyone for just about anything, sometimes it can take the form of outright harassment and stalking and it can be seriously misused until the sued party just gives up. A certain ex president (TFG) uses this as well as the cults Scientology and the Westboro baptist church, who infamously picket funerals with hateful signs and noise.

Sadly we have our share of the Faithnuts and the Radical Faithnuts as well.
It came,I tend to think, with the territory when Prime Minister, Happy Clappy Jesus Chappy, U-Turns are Easy, Duck and Run when there's a crisis, I love Gladys, Scum Mo Morrison jumped in to fill the chair after him and the Liberal Party knifed Malcomtent Turball in the back.
As to the courts allowing such a lawsuit to be upheld, well, most regrettably our Highest Court of Appeal let that Low-life, Scum-sucking, Pope's Arse-kissing, Lying Bastard of a Kiddie Fiddler Cardinal off the hook so that says a whole lot about justice down here doesn't?

If that's what it takes to 'overstep the mark' , I hope the Aussies will continue to test that mark. I have no knowledge of Australian radio, but I wonder if they don't have preachers on the radio that say much worse about atheists, evolutionary scientists, uppity women, etc.

Seems like the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to show God did it.

Khalil Farah should stop being a snowflake

Well, that's a complete load of bullshit.