Agnostic.com

36 4

Can humans think without language? Try it.

tymtravler 6 May 24
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

36 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Thinking is nothing more than the processing of things you have learned throughout your life. The processing of intelligence. Without "language" (in whatever form it takes), there is no intelligence, so there can be no thought.

ravens are highly intelligent, with little to no indication of a language. That implies that a human raised in complete isolation loses the ability to reason, and I find that... unlikely.

@dellik no one said reason or navigate for survival.

@Clauddvon thats correct, no one said reason, or navigate for survival, you said intelligence is not possible without language, and I provided an example of something that displays intelligence, without language. Now that we agree we are on the same topic, do you see how you are mistaken?

@dellik I can see your point. However, even animals have language and thought. It's just not the same as our language and thought. Ravens make sounds and communicate with other Ravens so they have thought and intelligence.

My initial point is still very valid. Animals...ALL animals only process and think about those things that they have learned, communicated and lived. So any animal can think if they have experienced any of these things. Not how we do, but that's irrelevant.

Also no one says (except you) that you lose what you've learned. I don't believe that.

@Clauddvon lose what you learned? no where did I say, nor even come close to implying that.

And if you could only think about what you have learned, it would be impossible for anyone to learn anything new.. are you unfamiliar with abstract thinking?

You do not need communication for thought. thus, you do not need language for thought.

@dellik Read the last sentence and then go away. "Culture, experience and.... Teaching."... This LEARNED. Even abstract teaching, reasoning and thought is learned.

How Does Abstract Reasoning Develop?
Developmental psychologist Jean Piaget argued that children develop abstract reasoning skills as part of their last stage of development, known as the formal operational stage. This stage occurs between the ages of 11 and 16. However, the beginnings of abstract reasoning may be present earlier, and gifted children frequently develop abstract reasoning at an earlier age. Some psychologists have argued that the development of abstract reasoning is not a natural developmental stage. Rather, it is the product of culture, experience, and teaching.

@Clauddvon wow, 'and then go away.' no problem tool lmfao.

0

Do it all the time. In fact, most of the time. Just what kind of conversation are you having as you drive a car?

"Oh! don't get too close!" "A little to the left, now take your foot off the gas"

Sure, there is the occasional "You moron!" But, like when you are catching a ball, you don't think "A little to the left, a little to the right...." while you are doing it. All of your overt, conscious actions involve thinking. And MOST of it is non-verbal.

Exactly! That's exactly what you're thinking when your driving or catching a ball. It may be shorthand but your thoughts are words.

No it's not. You move your arms by a certain amount. You don't think "Two degrees to the left."

@novoxguy I can't move my arms 2 degrees to the left nor can you without some way to measure. It could be 3 degrees or it could be 5 degrees. We normally don't think in those terms. Also reflexes aren't thoughts.

@tymtravler if you can't move your arms to specific angles, then how can you reach out and pick something up?

0

Yes they can! If you would like to get into a long conversation about linguistics. I will leave you with this thought,... the human voice box did not evolve until 2 million years or so ago as taught by a 1st generation chompsky. Now if you wish to talk about non verbal communication and social cognitive inference then we should continue. I would love to finish this conversation.

Etre Level 7 May 24, 2018

@Donotbelieve will do, must play piano for a while, get back to conversation soon. Fascinates me as well ! Thank You.

@Donotbelieve
This is actually a very good and somewhat deep question. Most could care the less over the matter. To understand the aquisition of language and it's relationship with consciousness, we need to look at language and what exactly language is. A communicative format that uses symbols, sounds, inflected tones, harmony, melody, ect.. ect... Perhaps... A comunicative format does not have to use any of the afore metioned concepts. Sign language. No sound at all. However even in the most deafness of emotion, I remember a fellow student who so moved in his communication of sign, would try to vocalize his emotion when signing. How could this be? This human had been deaf since birth. How is it that when trying to symbolize his thoughts through sign, he would express often with a vocal tone? Using sound for communicating thoughts and Ideas extends to the far reaches of our past. Using sound for communication exists within nature itself.

The symbiotic relationship between humans and environment is an exponential equation. How did humans learn language? How did humans create language? Maybe the latter is more fitting. How is that humans have a capacity for thought? What is Consciousness? How do humans communicate consciousness? Do animals not communicate emotion to their offspring?

Dictionaries define words, words define language, language defines Spirit, or better yet Consciousness.

The Great Philosopher and Mathemation Rene Decarte stated, "cogito ergo sum", I think therefore I exist.

The lingustic record holds that the voice box did not evolve till some 2 million years ago. Modern Humans begin around 130k years ago. However recent evidence pushes that number back a couple hundred thousand years. So how did humans communicate and what symbols did they use?

How do children learn? How do puppies learn?

Social Inference or Social Cognitive Inference is a term that refers to how a conscious beings learn or aquire a capacity for language and communication through the given environment. Children do not speak a language with a verbal syntax and grammer. However they do have a means of communicating their thoughts and feelings. Is this stating that enfants do not have a language? I truly do not know. Who does?

What we do know is that even the most basic forms of life communicate. Are these simple life forms using a language and better yet are they thinking without using said language?

What is a language?

Their are some 7 thousand languages on the planet right now. We lose about 250 languages a year. I learned this in 2010. So we are probably closer to 6 thousand.

The act of thought does not require a language. The act of communicating emotion does not require a language. These concepts only exist because we have given symbols(letters), to define the vocal tones that communicate the conscious thought. Just as hand signals and shapes were assigned meaning to communicate emotion, syntax, and grammer.

Do humans not communicate nonverbally?

Are we thinking about and how to use a language when we communicate non verbally?

Are we spelling out terms nonverbally?

If humans learn by means of infering, then I venture to say that it is more reactionary. And it is from this reaction, that humans begin to form a symbiotic relationship with environment. And from this symbiotic relationship, humans formed a language of audible and inflected tones to communicate and or express emotion and or noun verbage syntax grammer, from which mean old ladies with degrees in a language art demand complience unto the properness of speaking that language format.

So to truly answer the question, we must have a complete definition and meaning from the question, of the concept or verb "to think".

Can humans think without language?

Shall we go deeper, or has the question been answered?

@Donotbelieve
For the record I studied classical voice, French, and linguistics. I just read your latest post, nice. It appears we have come to similar conculsions. I have read most of the posts here. My conclusions are formed from my studies and knowledge base. I have been accused of copy pasting from enternet sources, however i only do this when showing the definition of a term. And if I am citing a source, then I show the source.

[en.m.wikipedia.org]

0

Yup..language limits what people can comprehend.

That's why English is commonly used in science since many languages lack essential concept words. I.e., in Haitian Creole, almost any animal is a "bete," so not a good language for studying entomology, for instance.

I have to disagree with that. Not having a word for something doesn't mean you can't comprehend it. Language limits your ability to communicate with someone else, but that is different from comprehension. There are plenty of people, who I don't know their name, but recognize their face and know facts about them. Their name is a label, just like the name of an animal in Haitian Creole. I'm sure that if you showed them a picture of an animal they don't have a unique name for it, they could tell you things about it that is unique to it, all the same.

@novoxguy It's something I read about while at the university..our particular learned languages limit our perceptions of the world. For instance, Thai people have several times the number of colors they commonly name.

Not just blue, but "sky blue," or some other shade. I'll point at what I think of as "red" and the children will call it the Thai word for the color orange-red.

Even Europeans didn't "see" the color blue until fairly recently, thinking of the blue ocean and sky as "clear," instead of the color blue.

Also, just learning to read and write can rewire an adult brain. The rural Haitians couldn't even understand a photograph..to them, it was a blob of color dots, although they tried to humor by pretending to "see" what I told them was there.

Learning to read and write rewires adult brain in six months [newscientist.com]

@birdingnut I've read such an article before, and it's nonsense. You know that some scientists once reasoned the Aboriginal children were not as smart as their western counterparts. They gave the same IQ test to both. Problem was, the test involved recognizing household items, like thimbles and buttons. Things which the Aboriginal children were not familiar. But, later the test was repeated, where the items were rocks, seeds and leaves. Give the same test, the Western children would be the ones to do poorly. Haitians don't recognize a photograph? I bet that's an outright lie.

1

Of course humans can think without language, because we think in pictures, not words. If we thought in words, every one of us would be a tallented writer and orator. We would all be exemplary communicaters and the world would be a much better place, devoid of misunderstanding. Thanks for the visual. I would love to live in a world like that.

pretty sure we think in both images and words. sometimes images of words. sometimes my thoughts are silently verbal. Ie I 'hear' them. sometimes they are simply a series of pictures, much like a how to manual, and other times they appear as text in my minds eyes. I assume its much the same for all of us.

What...? Listen to yourself. No words, only pictures?

@tymtravler Your right. I can't believe I forgot about the inner running monologue. There definately must be an element of both.

1

I am sure they can, but it is very hard to find humans that have never been exposed to language for testing.

2

When your dog has nightmares it's thinking without words unless you are the reason for the nightmare.

How do you know your dog has nightmares? Are you perhaps giving them human qualities? Animals have instincts, think Pavlov's dog. Interpreting a dog's behavior as dreams is your intrpretation.

@tymtravler
Scientific studies have been conducted on dogs in the dream state of sleep. He is correct! Unless the data has changed I believe the studies came out in late 90's but not positive when they came out. Maybe I will try to find them.

1

My brain thinks in various screams

0

That’s why I wonder what animals think!

1

"Abstract thinking is definitely something humans can do. It's a quick way to consider ideas by using symbols that represent them. Fast thinking without language can be achieved by using abstract thoughts. ... However, language has its benefits too."

[owlcation.com]

0

Huge hun drug dhji....No it's not working.

0

Does Clingon count?

0

Barely? After the last election I'm not sure how much it helps.

0

Do you think he has thought here?

1

I am largely aware of my thought processes and a great deal of my thinking is done in images. Because of that, I would say that we can, but probably don't very much. We have grown accustomed to language based communication. What about the other primates in our line? Elephants? The cetacean family? We now know they are all capable of abstract thought, but what language they have is perhaps too primitive to be of much use in their thinking. I can't be certain of this, but I would have to say, yes.

1

To some extent it depends on how you define language. Some people think music, some think pictures, some think math, and some think aromas and tastes.

0
0

Damn.... a catch question.... alright...I say yes. Doesn't hand jesters become a language when used to explain? The same as a facial expression?

0

This is a great question, " I think so ".

1

I believe so, I think that would be called intuition, where you just have a feeling.

1

If I start to sit down on a rattle snake, I just think to move! I don't think, "I should move." 😉

3

Language codifies thought. Not the other way around

But I do think language expands thought

1

yes i can

0

Individually very little, one person alone without language to connect them would learn so little, no clothes, cooking, even the simplest tool like a sharp stick. They would have to invent or discover everything. A simple intuitve language of gestures might enable the most bare survival.but all of science and philosophy and nearly all practical knowledge would be lost without it.

0

Before we had language, we had communication. I'm sure that three human beings contacted each other to warn of predators, to indicate the possibilities of food, and to pass on any other short-term Communications, just as chimpanzees and other primates do.

But you get to your question, we see images, we see facial expressions, and we can probably store those somewhere in our memory areas of our brain.

Your question depends on what you mean by "think." If you mean "store and process Communications and images," then we can think. If you mean "solve complex equations and imagine our own death," then early human predecessors could not do that.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:89805
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.