Nope. Also, I'd only marry someone who could spell "you".

"Marry"??? You lost me right there......

Not evening dating one .

I’ve been married to one for the last 44 years and am getting along just fine.

Welcome to the asylum. Enjoy your stay.

Been there, done that, burned the t-shirts (yes, more than one).
It rarely works. Sure, there are some who claim it works for them, but I think
those cases are few and far between.

I have learned that it is not possible for me to be in a relationship with ANYONE
who harbors religious delusions.
As I said in another post, it may start out with promises that "it doesn't matter if you don't believe the same things I do", BUT inevitably, those promises turn out to have
been lies, and it DOES matter.

I believe it's even worse to have children with someone who believes in things that don't exist. It is a source of constant disagreement, and it's rare when then the non-believer can successfully raise their children without forced religious influences.
I'm a firm believer that children should NOT be given the option of making up their
own minds about religion. I think that's an unmitigated load of bullshit.
I also firmly believe that ALL religious indoctrination of children should be classified as felony child abuse.

My personal experience has proved to me that it is not possible to have a successful
"romantic" relationship with a believer.
I believe believers are mentally ill. I have no interest in being involved with someone who is actively engaging in a deliberate mental illness.

Absolutely not. Probably not even someone who believes in ghosts!

I don't think a theist would marry me... as they'd have to accept fully my beliefs first. Pretty sure that's not an option. Besides, I'd have too hard a time pretending I respected their lifestyle.

Sex yes, marry no. Some of those Christian women are really frisky. They love to tell God they are coming!

No, I would not marry a theist because I place far too much value on intellectual honesty.

if he had a good job and a big enough pecker yes

Staunch believers are intolerable.

There are plenty of lukewarm, hypocritical Christians who only give lip-service to their family traditional faith. They attend church on certain holy days, and live a secular life otherwise.

But even if you are dating a sincere believer, men benefit from patriarchal church traditions that expect women to cook, clean, have children, put husband and family first, even if she works. As long as she doesn't attack, nag, or ridicule his beliefs, no problem.

But I personally, wouldn't date a theist, unless it's clear the person is blase about religion.

I've been tentatively renewing a relationship with an ex who identifies as religious, mostly because of pure physical attraction. He said he's not attended church for a decade, doubts the whole Christianity thing.

As a "demi-sexual," I don't feel sexual attraction for anyone until after a close relationship of WELL over a year, and then I can only feel attraction for THAT person. But since he's an "ex," I've already bonded with him.

Facebook video chats with an old friend lifts my spirits, even if the relationship can't go anywhere, since I'm a recovering cancer patient.

Been in a relationship with a cradle catholic for 26 years. So far not a problem. We have enough family drama to deal with to keep us busy. Sometimes I ask her to pray to her saint that helps me find my keys. I do call her my praying mantis and she just goes along with it.

No.

I believe a positive relationship should be based on mutual respect and honesty.

To assert faith (belief without evidence) is a methodology to determine truth (things that can be demonstrated with facts) is dishonest. Faith is the foundation of the theist mind-set. As I do not respect dishonest people and I value truth over superstition I do not tolerate theists.

Why marry at all???

Highly unlikely. I just can not respect those who buy into the myth(s) to such a degree (brainwashing). Respect is a necessary ingredient for any marriage that I would willingly participate in.

It would certainly be easier if the theist in question simply believes there is some sort of god/force/consciousness that is responsible for creation and leaves it at that. If this person has put this god/creator into a box/holy book, saying it wants this or that of us--well, that would be absolutely out of the question.

Even so, I have enough believers to deal with in my life. I prefer someone with whom I have a connection as a non-believer.

Yes and I did 35 years ago .She does not attend any church.No issues .Interesting discussions once in a while in regards to belief and non belief . Daughter exposed to both points of view and was not swayed either way.A closed minded nonbeliever who would not marry a theist is no better than a closed minded theist who would not marry a nonbeliever .

Not until I convert her to atheism.

I can tolerate theists, but a spouse needs more than toleration. A married couple should work together toward their common pursuits. Theism divides families.

Nope and I can't imagine being attracted to someone who asked me my star sign or offered to read my cards either. Hell, I don't want a moron.

I don't want but I can't find any atheist

Hardcore? Fuck no!

I don't believe marriage is necessary for a happy committed relationship.... but then, we have common law relationships in my country. Whereas, such a thing may not exist where you live. I would not marry anyone, but I definitely won't be marrying a theist, especially a christian or muslim.

No! I don't think I could. Especially if they were of the evangelical bend like my family. I had enough of that garbage growing up.

Probably not, but there are theists and then there are theists.

I would absolutely not be involved with a rabid fundamentalist. I might be involved with a liberal Christian, particularly one who isn't particularly practicing their faith.

I was in fact married to an evangelical (rural Methodist) at the time I deconverted but it presented literally zero problem for our marriage. She died of a lengthy illness. She did not agree with me but understood my reasons. I did not attempt to argue against something that gave her comfort in her final years.

But our relationship had always been based on mutual love and respect for each other, not on religious affiliations or activities. Her illness also made it basically impossible to participate in church, which meant our social lives weren't tangled up in it. That helped too.

So there are a lot of factors that go into this beyond simply "are they theists".

Currently I am married to an atheist who doesn't like that label for herself, preferring "agnostic" for the same philosophically inconsistent, yet socially comprehensible, reasons that many people do: it seems, to popular perception, more open-minded. Atheist seems too reactionary and harsh. It's too socially limiting an identity.

Even I only go so far as to apply the label "atheist" to myself; I don't lead with it socially. It generally doesn't even need to come up, here outside the Bible belt.