Sounds good to me!
Fine. Let women do this. Without them men would not even shave.
@maturin1919 True, but because of men women shave way too much.
@maturin1919 We already went through that in the 60's and 70's.
@Sticks48 We did? I must've missed that glut of female leaders. Could you list them pls?
@MsDemeanour I was referring to the not shaving comment. lol
It doesn't matter to me one bit of which sex is in charge.
What is wrong with the way things are going, (and the list of that is a few miles long), has nothing to do with gender.
The way our government is run is far beyond deplorable.
It goes much farther than who is president atm.
Just my 2 cents.
I made a personal commitment years ago that I would stop voting for white males. My first choice is women of any color or nationality, men of any color or nationality, just not while males. (If the choices are there to be made)
As long as we're careful. Just because someone's a woman doesn't mean she has everyone's best interests at heart. I mean, look at deVos.
Can I not? Look at deVos? I don't feel like puking. Again.
On second thought, deVos is a lovable idiot child compared to Dana Loesch, if we really want to speak of female dicks.
the women would a thousand times better than Bannon
So true !
They could not do worse than too damned many male leaders have. But, women seeking power and leadership posts would do well to heed the criticism of Guenther Grass of German feminist movements in the 1980s: "The problem with them is that they are trying to use power like men. We already have too many stupid men in the world."
YES! Unfortunately women going into politics have had to play by the 'boys club' rules. jesus they have to have balls just to put up with the crap. I don't know a single work place where I haven't worked where the work place hasn't improved by a balance of the sexes. The G7 summit is a big dick contest on the world stage. The whole gov't culture needs to change. We need parliament to be made up of experience people with backgrounds in not just banking but social services, the armed services, health department, science, education, public transport. (perhaps a little less of the actors).
But men having been doing such a great job so far. Give us another few thousand years and we're going to have everything straightened out real good. Promise!
And we will all have to make our own sandwiches? No, that is so wrong!
We should be so lucky....
But - for the record - I consider myself more of a humanist than a feminist. Women should be allowed to work in whatever capacity they want to and are fit for. As should men....and if that means she puts on her high heel sneakers and goes out into the work world and he stays home to clean and cook and wipe those runny noses - so be it. There should be no judgements and no stigmas....people should do what makes them happy and fulfilled.
And to those who say women can't hold down important governmental or political jobs because they are somehow "captive to their hormones"......I point to the moron in the Oval office right now who has spent his entire life thinking with his penis. Just sayin'......
That would undoubtedly be better than the present fiasco.
What, decisions made with contemplation and forethought instead of ego and self-aggrandizement? Pishaw! Im all for half baked solutions made by corrupt men in backrooms and golf courses. Bringing women into equation would only add logic.
About freakin' time, if Bannon & ilk is the other choice