A "perfect world" is theoretically possible, is it not? Imagine what that world would look like to you. It doesn't have to be EVERYBODY'S idea of perfection, just your own.
Got it envisioned?
Now, what do you suppose would be the "result," other than the absence of problems on the macro level? What would it mean to you as one person, and to other people in your life, and to others no matter where they live?
As an agnostic or an atheist, would it matter?
Why?
The JW's have it figured out. The perfect world right here on earth where the lion plays with the lamb. Lions also no longer eat meat. They eat straw now and I guess their teeth have changed. Hard to eat straw with those pointy teeth.
On the serious side, get rid of greed and let everyone become concerned with their fellow man and this earth could become the perfect world. There would still be problems but we would work together toward common gain to solve them. Misinformation and the love of money prevents all of this now. Would it all matter as an atheist or agnostic? Would it improve our vision and outlook? Certainly because life has the meaning that you give it. Harmony is much better than earthly strife. This is why people invented gods and stories of heaven. Rather than false hope we need real hope.
You’ve had too many Watchtowers delivered!
@Geoffrey51 It was called studying religions.
A perfect world would be human free.
Amen brother
So true !!!!
As a human myself, I disagree! That would be sort of a waste of all good things we've done! A perfect world would be one full of people that have a conscience, a moral compass, people who put others' needs ahead of their own, knowing their needs will also be met because the other people have a conscience. There would be no poverty because the rich people (who have a conscience, right?) would gladly contribute enough of their wealth to make society work for all. There would be no homelessness for the same reason. There would be disease, but most would be cured, for the same reason. Does anyone need a second vacation home while there are people living in a box? Does any minister need a G6 while his followers are trying to figure out how to pay their rent? Does the current president think it was just and moral to not pay his contractors?
@Stilltrying1964 a waste of the good we have done... hmmm still trying to determine what good we have done that isnt human centric. I just don’t see any good we have done here.
Watch the animal rescue shows on Saturday mornings. I personally rescued a baby bird last week that fell out of my pecan tree. Dug up a big juicy worm from my back yard to feed it and drove it to an animal rescue facility about 10 or 15 miles from my house. I stop and get tortoises out of the road a couple times a year. People are designing machines to remove plastic from water bodies. Try seeing the glass is half-full instead of half-empty! Being atheist or agnostic doesn't mean you have to be pessimistic!
@Stilltrying1964 Good answer:
If an A.I. machine made all macro-decisions and overlaid a superstructure of 100% equality (not in outcomes, but opportunities), making manipulating the system very difficult if not impossible, wouldn't that FORCE people to interact more constructively to achieve their goals?
The life of the worm was appropriately used to sustain the life of a higher life-form, much in the same way we eat cattle.
@Stilltrying1964 It seems to me that all of the situations that we have to rescue animals from are human created
@nowhereman55. Well that's not true! The bird I rescued just fell out of a nest. The turtles are just moving along but happen into a roadway. Now a manatee that has been run over by a boat, yes, man made problem.
@JacobMeyers Couldn't be said better. The only instances where human beings have stepped up to addressing issues with say for example the environment, it is only because the degradation reached a point which affects human beings.
@Stilltrying1964 and why is it YOU get to judge which life forms are higher and more deserving?
@Stilltrying1964 Roads are man made so the turtle problem is man made. That bird that fell out of the nest will now grow to breed more baby birds that can’t stay in a nest without intervention. Maybe if you left that baby bird be a higher form of life coulda have used it for sustenance.
@DSGavde
You made me think a bit about other ways we might actually benefit the world. I came up with deflecting asteroids. In either case though it’s as you say, because something is going to affect us humans and not because we are trying to help other life.
@JacobMeyers. Education and common fucking.sense! Any more dumb questions? I can do this ALL day!
@JacobMeyers so I guess we should stop building roads, huh? Do you walk everywhere you go? No? Then stifle yourself! (Archie Bunker ripoff) All things in moderation. You are extremist. Smoke a joint and develop some normal thinking. You may want to go off the grid and live in the woods.
@JacobMeyers and btw, what kind of a person (a jerk) tries to make me feel bad for saving animals that need help?
@Stilltrying1964 yes I suppose it is quite easy to be ignorant and combative all day instead of exchanging ideas intelligently. Have a nice life dude.
The Taoist in me says perfection is achieved when we accept the world as it is without expectations — no "shoulds" and "oughts." The literalist in me says that's not the intent of the question and that perfection would be a world in which technology solves the problems of poverty, disease, and scarcity, transforming our lives and our society in a way that people have what they need and can pursue the things that give their lives meaning, whether it's through creativity or teaching or discovery or just through human connection. The cynic in me says that human nature is incompatible with such idealism and that we'd find a way to mess it up before we ever got started. Meanwhile, I'm wondering what these three guys are even doing inside me; I don't remember agreeing to a fourway.
Have you considered the possibility IF there wasn't at the core of our culture a deeply pessimistic prophecy of certain doom (Armaggedon), but instead an optimistic prophecy of utopia, our outlooks and expectations, and indeed our whole attitude toward others, might be different?
@Storm1752 I think most people don't believe in Armageddon. At least, I've seen very little of that belief in modern society. There are some who think the end days are coming and will result in a scorched Earth, but I'd say that truly is a small minority of the more conservative, fundamentalist sects.
@Storm1752 I must say I don’t know any of these Armageddonite Doomasters. Times may be hard for some but not as hard as even 50 years ago if you live in the West. On that basis the trajectory is certainly up, but as Resserts Taoist suggests acceptance is the key not striving for goals outside of your influence.
@Storm1752 Those who study and research climate change and the eventual deforestation, polluted water and air, fossil fuel contamination, loss of native species every day and other man-made destruction of this planet is the scientific truth- no false prophesy...this is our future and that of the next generation.
Reality already is perfect. Whatever happens happens under natural laws that are neither good nor bad. We humans might assign value judgments but those are artificial. Some judgments are probably necessary for survival, but if you constantly view the world as fearful, ugly and evil you will wallow unnecessarily in fear, anger and unhappiness.
My thoughts as well. It is this idea that helped bring me to feeling comfortable as an agnostic with no particular God concept. "Perfection" that is the natural order doesn't conform to our individual subjective wants and desires. We also do not create our own realities, although we do create our own constructs of reality in order to navigate through it. The closer our construct of reality, the better we are likely to be able to deal with it.
Terrific reply. I agree completely!!!
If the perfect world included other people it would fall apart very quickly because no two people want the same things. The solution is compromise which screws the whole idea of a perfect world.
A perfect world would be boring in the long run.
But wouldn't it force people to devise ways to NOT be bored? If we no longer used all our energies to vent our disdain and oppose "evil," and instead used them to create new paradigms, or if they spontaneously combusted to fill the vacuum thus created (by negative religions, for example), wouldn't that possibly transform "human nature?"
This is the idea underlying William Blake's prophetic poems. There is no one world; the world is what you think about it and you can use your powers of perception to raise it up to perfection if you want to.
Funny, I was contemplating Blake earlier today, particularly The Tyger and reference to the French Revolution. An English noble or some such had declared that the French were “establishing a republic of tigers”. It works on many allegorical levels but just considered that idea for a while.
Blake seemed to see the human experience of good and bad as contraries that made up the fulness of life and should be accepted that way. That said, I think he was very, very disappointed with how Napoleon turned out. I think we’re meant to understand The Tyger as a contrary to The Lamb. When he asks ‘Did he who made the Lamb make thee?’, I feel sure he’s certain that ‘he’ did.
the neo-conservatives know that the current financial system is going to crash & burn. so they are taking everything they can out of the system before that happens.
I’m definitely not laughing due to the question... I do think it is possible... for me being present in the moment, that’s perfection, it does take work... away from expectations from others and myself...often times when I look at children I see perfection ... that wild eyed wonder.. that beginners mind... that breath that feels up my chest ...
There is no perfect world. But if you accept whatever happens, that is a perfect response.
That’s the only thing you can do... accept it and move on...
To answer your first question, no, I don’t think a perfect world is possible. The “seven deadly sins” if you will pardon the religious context, will always exist, at least in part, in the best of us. It’s our nature. It’s who we are. But my “better” world would be one where everyone realizes this, and makes a conscious effort to improve and do no harm.
People create individual realities, as is seen in the "Schrodinger's Kittens" thought experiment.
The world is perfect. As perfect as evolution has made it. Over breeding and greed of homo sapiens have spoiled it.
Yry telling an zntelope being chased down by a hungry lion the world is perfect. lol
in order to have a perfect world we would need perfect ppl.
it's totally Fcked & getting worse.
I don't know. The longer I go without religion, the more I'm fine with the world as it is. Yes, there's suffering and horrible things but there's a lot more good, peaceful moments in the world. I think we tend to focus on the bad parts and make them more than they are.
If we could just bring down the use of fossil fuels and the CO2 rate in the atmosphere, that would be a good start.
It'd pretty much be the Culture from the Iain M Banks novels.