Agnostic.com

28 26

Renowned liberal Atheist Richard Dawkins claims Liberals and Leftists are cowards in regards to Islam

biguy12 6 Mar 9
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

28 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

15

It is because they do not want to be labeled racists which is ridiculous because anyone with an ounce of brain matter is aware that Islam is not a race but a religion .He is absolutely correct.

I concur.

12

I can't disagree with him.

Neither can I.

11

From what I have observed here this site is overrun with these cowards.LOL

That’s for sure

10

Could not agree with him more but they are Cowards AND hypocrites!

repcon Level 5 Mar 10, 2023
9

He's right that many progressives are so paranoid about being called racist, that they'll stay silent about appalling practices in some cultures and religions rather than risk being called racist. He says the quiet part out loud and cops the flak accordingly and knowingly because some people need to. It's easy to squark self- gratuitously about respecting all cultures and beliefs equally, but in the real world beliefs and cultures are human created things and should be critiqued without fearing that such critiques are racist based. This has been lost over recent times in this fog of political correctness and woke self- satisfaction.

Your scenario plays a certain tune.

And then we know that the United Nations drafted a treaty to eliminate all forms of discrimination against women. Those refusing to draft and sign are some of the usual suspects. Those are Iran, Somalia and Sudan.

Oh...and the United States. Because the religious right here, here in our borders continue to demand to treat females as "less than" from birth to grave.

9

He's right.

9

And he wouldn't be wrong about that either.

8

He's absolutely right - tie a God to fascism and no one's allowed to criticise that fascism, and anyone who does criticise it is branded as a fascist by the useful idiots of the left.

8

He's right. You can talk about pedo-priests but if you say the prophet Muhammad was a pedophile, you are an islamophobe. If you bring up 9/11 and mention that 19 Moslems flew planes into the towers so they get with 70 virgins? You are a hateful racist. If you bring up honor killings or even say the word "Sharia*, you are a wingnut bigot.

But nearly all the 9-11 attackers were Saudis, but bush2 took us to war with Afghanistan and Iraq. I don't think anyone really excuses the honor killings who is outside of it. But men in the US have even recently been exonerated for killing a wife they believed was cheating.

@BufftonBeotch Dubya had his own agenda because his father lost the presidency and Saddam Hussein was still in power at the same time. He invented Iraqi involvement to carry a torch for GHW Bush and 1991 Iraq Kuwaiti war. True the 19 hijackers were all Saudis. They were also all Mohammedans who killed 3K people for their religious jihad. Honor killings are acts of savages. Don't forget Charlie Hebdo. Don't forget Islamic jihadists posting videos proudly beheading Americans. There are plenty of Muslims who still defend it all. People were dancing in the streets of Palestine on 9/11. People will swear that didn't happen but it most certainly did.

@barjoe And what of the Mexican women and other Latina lost. All of them nearly exclusively devoted christian.
Nearly all religions are lethal to girls and women.

@BufftonBeotch We can't single out Mohammedans. Maybe Richard Dawkins was describing yourself.

@barjoe I just only see small degrees where Islam adherents are worse than others.

After all, there is a treaty in the UN for codify that women are human beings deserving of equal rights ad protections. It has been signed and ratified by all countries in the world except these -- Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Tonga, Palau -The Holy See (big surprise) - And the United States.

Forgive me if I continue to think that the US is NOT any better.

8

Dawkins' opinion is noted.

7

Sorry, but I'm a Liberal and a Freethinker, and I do advocate for the rights of women and for sexual freedom, but I think we would be better off if both the Bible and the Koran did not exist, and that people would start recognizing what dangerous, archaic and repressive literature they are. Muslem countries need a "Liberal Arts" education instead of rote memorization of the repressive laws of Bronze-Age Islamic bigotry, designed to keep people ignorant and submissive to people who don't practice what they preach! (Notice, I did say both the Bible and Kuran) Salman Rushdie is my hero.By the way, I also admire some "Christians" like Jimmie Carter who DO practice what they preach, and don't foist their beliefs on others.

The Salman Rushdie case is a prime example of what savage animals they are.

@barjoe Not to mention the various attacks in France, Denmark, US and others. Any group who believes their way is the only way (including Israel, who claim to be "God's chosen people" ) should be ignored.

@fishline79 Eradicated? Who said anything about eradicating people? You did? You need to shut the fuck up with that shit.

@barjoe
Eradicate: destroy completely; put an end to.
"this disease has been eradicated from the world" OK maybe that was a bad choice of words and not what I meant. I changed my comment. I was referring to the philosophy or institution, not the "people". Lighten up.

@fishline79 When you speak of eradicated regarding a group that means genocide. I saw you changed it to "ignored". I am openly critical of religions, Islam in particular for their misogyny, violence and tyranny but that doesn't mean I want to eradicate Muslims or any other group.. When I read stuff like that, I can't "lighten up", lest my silence taken to mean I concur.

Eraducate will win the OED's neologism of the year.

Eraducate is a portmanteau of eradicate and educate.

Its use is largely confined to religious debate on whether or not an infinity of angels dance on the head or the point of o pin e.

@barjoe Suit yourself. I think I conceded to your complaint, and explained myself as much as I'm prepared too. If that's not to your satisfaction, that's your problem, and you are a self-righteous prig. Frankly I'm the last person to be called violent or bigoted, so sue me.

@waitingforgodo The people who post here are the most intolerant dorks I have ever encountered, for "freethinkers". So I spelled eradicate wrong in it's first usage! Excuse my typo. W.t.F. does OED mean, anyway, or "Point of o pin e"?

@fishline79

I wasn't complaining about the typo, I was lauding its inadvertent brilliance.

The OED is the Oxford English Dictionary.

Head of a pin: o pin: o pin e: opine.

Then the people here must be the most intolerant dork prescriptivists and the most intolerant dork descriptivists you have encountered.

@waitingforgodo Sorry, but lately I seem to get "raked over the coals" for every comment I make, even the most seemingly innocuous. Besides, you have what is, to me, a rather cryptic way of writing.

6

A recent incident at an English school shows how the religious extremists can try to bully the rest.
A boy was persuaded to bring a copy of the Koran in to the school and it was slightly damaged when being passed around.
The leaders of the local mosque are demanding that this should be considered a hate crime and the boys in question be suspended from school. They have even been getting death threats. We are so worried about hurting the feelings of a vociferous minority.
A totally over the top reaction and those people should be told what to do with themselves and their precious Koran.

Cite the school and the date this happened.
Or did you learn about this on a blog?
For one thing the child would not just "pass around" the Quran. They were probably taunting him and snatched it and were tossing it around.

@BufftonBeotch

I don't know if this BBC radio programme can be accessed from outside the UK, but it discusses this incident.

[bbc.co.uk]

"The cover of a Quran was torn in a school in Wakefield, Yorkshire and four students were suspended. The next day, police were called after the boy involved in the incident received death threats. It lead to debate online about whether our laws should protect religious people from offence, or should uphold free speech. We'll get to the bottom of what went on and explore how you balance respect for religion with free speech?"

Needless to say, no action will be taken against the people who made death threats because that's a natural response from such peaceful people when their book of bigotry is attacked.

@BufftonBeotch [independent.co.uk]

Touchy !!. I have no great love for Suella but I agree with her this time.

@David_Cooper Blasphemy laws were repealed in the UK as recently as 2008 although I am sure there were no convictions for many years before this.
Whenever i am told by Christians how loving their religion is I tell them to ask the descendants of Archie Aitkenhead. Difficult, a he was the last person to be executed for blasphemy in Scotland c 300 years ago.

@David_Cooper The death threat are obviously coming from the insane. But the bullying was also grounds for severe punishment.

5

Yet, during an interview earlier this year with The Sun, he condemned his fellow liberals as "cowards" over their apparent failure to condemn Islam for the way it treats certain people.

When asked whether it was possible to have a sensible conversation about Islam, Prof Dawkins explained why it had became particularly difficult for him.

He said: "People who think I'm right wing, are decent liberal people who I regard as my own - I've always been among those people.

"But I regard them as cowards because they cave in and they do not observe their principles of feminism, of gay rights, all the things that decent liberal people believe, suddenly they forget about them when it comes to Islam.

4

Agree .The leftists liberal feminists are also silent cowards when it comes to Islam and should be protesting the brutal oppression of middle eastern woman .

4

I have the highest regard for Professor Dawkins, but I suspect that he did not consider the full range of natural variations among liberals. Speaking as an example of the agnostic/atheist variety, I can say my attitude toward Christianity, Judaism, and Islam is fairly even-handed. I say, a pox on all their houses! ⛪🕍🕌

That's my outlook. And civil liberties in the US are far more endangered by Xtians than any other religion.

@BufftonBeotch Yes, in this country, the Xtians are, by a large margin, the greatest threat to freedom.

3

There have been a few political figures on all areas of the political spectrum who have spoken out against Islam, however, in the Conservative Party, Sajid Javid who is a Muslim was Home Secretary. The UK Parliament has become more ethnically diverse over the years and the current PM, Rishi Sunak, is a Hindu. Religion or not holding a religious viewpoint is not such a contentious issue here in the UK as it is in the US. So, I do wonder about Richard Dawkin’s statement in the above quoted excerpt.

There is alot of things like freedom and how the Muslims treat sexuality, I would not agree with. A Good point, is to live and let live. As long as their tribe is not harming my tribe. Or mandating anything force against me or my tribe's .Will not except if anybtribe is being harmful or dishonest against my tribe as an artist, bio-orgamism and individualism. Certainly, I will challenge back or crawl back into my cowadly tiny box..

3

I consider myself a left leaning liberal, but I have never been a coward to any religion, they all suck and they're all a danger to society.

@FrancoFran nothing is a religion to me, to assume that without knowing who I am is not only asinine but outright stupid.

3

I'm not and i have noticed neither are many of you too!.
is he always making stupid generalizations like this or descending into dementia now?

He's not at all senile, he's just old enough that he doesn't give a shit and isn't afraid to tell the truth.

I wouldn't insult his intelligence, though I don't like the generalisation he makes. I agree that true liberals (and conservatives for that matter) would never abandon their principles.

Dementia for speaking the truth ? You wold be fortunate if you had 1% of his intellect you pathetic asswipe.

@repcon
He’s a hero for sure:

@repcon try "would' instead of "wold" and try rereading my comments...i worship neither gawd or dawkins, unlike you apparently.

@AnneWimsey

@biguy12 Says the guy making thinly-veiled sad references to his junk........

3

That’s because atheist aren’t fond of religions in general. And the leftist that aren’t atheist tend to be proponents of christianity. These are the libs that are referred to as snowflakes, because they can’t decide if they want science or mythology to dictate and govern them…..🤠

2

@biguy12 What is your purpose in reminding us of Dawkins' opinion?

What is the purpose of any post? What is the purpose of your comment?

@barjoe Exactly .I did not wish to answer this idiotic question .

@barjoe

Seeking to explore the motivation of @biguy12, and more recently, his incisive riposte.

2

Just finished listening to this interview. Definitely agree with him.
I recall Armin Nevabi mentioning something similar, several times on his podcasts, and in person during his visits to Mississauga and Toronto (went to them both), he says (paraphrasing), "I will fight for your right to believe in anything you want, BUT you must also allow your beliefs to be open to criticism."

2

Where did Dawkins actually say what is quoted above?

Evidently you do not know much about one of the most famous and familiar atheists ,evolutionary biologists and authors on the planet There are numerous videos on YouTube with him stating this in person ,including debates, Also many publications .

@biguy12 I could not locate an exact quote as your OP above. "Liberals and Leftists are cowards” in Google produces your OP. Nothing by Dawkins himself. No luck with “They believe in protecting the rights of feminism”. "they are completely silent" "dawkins" doesn’t yield anything relevant. Was it a paraphrase instead of a direct quote?

I know enough about Dawkins to realize he popularized George Williams’ concept of the evolutionary gene…to much fanfare and per Ernst Mayr merely wrapped “concept” in a fancy evolutionary package with memes. He and Gould didn’t quite see eye to eye on many things. He tweeted plenty of of off-putting things over the years.

@Scott321 The video is posted above by another member Ryo1

@biguy12
I asked if that entire quote attributed to Dawkins was direct or just a paraphrase and you evaded by directing me to an hour long video. Starting just after timestamp 50:11 it is at best a paraphrase and not a direct quote excepting the “So they overlook the HOMOPHOBIA and the rampant MISOGYNY”. The whole “ "Liberals and Leftists are cowards. They donot believe in their own principles.They believe in protecting the rights of feminism, Gay people but when it comes to Islam. They are completely silent." is not even close to verbatim.

Coming from the auto-generated Youtube transcript which may itself be off we get Dawkins kinda saying: “decent liberal people who I regard as my own people I've always been among among those people who I regard as cowards because they they cave in and they do not observe their principles of feminism of gay rights all the things that decent liberal people believe suddenly they forget about them when it comes to Islam…” At about the 51:07 mark we get “they overlook the homophobia and them and that the rampant misogyny and the rampant homophobia of extreme Islamism…”

2

Iran and Saudi Arabia have the money and the motive to pay both sides to denounce Jews or Israel. Some recipients are (self-hating) Jews themselves! Strange bedfellows indeed. Even so, the news still carries what the Muslims are doing in Afghanistan, Iran and in Pakistan. Islam will always have its defenders, unfortunately.

2

Lefty go from extreme of the gay ABCs then puperty blockers for kid in school. To ignoring extreme homophobe and misogynistic people. I'm a happy anarchist watching these freak shows, peacefully. Send in the political clowns🤣

Puberty blockers are looked on approvingly for promising, young female gymnasts to keep them smaller in statue and from developing too much.
But this is further approved because it may be administered without the mere females consent or will.

@BufftonBeotch

Sweden banned puberty blockers because it would sterilized reproduction systems and harm bone structures.

1

Do school yard Muslims force everyone to pray 10x a day? When that bs happens I hope the teachers and school leaders forbid it and don't cave.

And it is the goal of the right wing extremists to coerce all children to do specific Xtian prayers in schools and to replace science with bible study.

@BufftonBeotch FKN Neanderthals.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:713467
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.