I'm not sure into which category to post this speculation, so I eventually plumped for "general"
The bible has the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, ancient cities condemned by god as practicing "evil and depraved" acts.
Could those acts have included bestiality?
Leda and the swan springs to mind.
Could this have resulted in a deadly virus infection?
To the populations of those days, with no knowledge of single celled organisms, let alone bacteria and viruses, the only explanation could be god's displeasure, and they would search for reasons to account for this displeasure.
Over the subsequent years the story would be further embellished to become the biblical tale.
Geologists and ardheologists have examined the ruins of Sodom and Gomorah and concluded the city was actually the victim of a two fold disaster. Firs of all the geology of the area is full of packets of natural gas. So the disaster happened like this, there was a huge earthquake, which released heavier than air natural gas that stayed closer to the ground, and then after the gas accumulated, there was a huge explosion which destroyed the city. The biblical story was written after the fact as a morality tale. Lot's wife was probably killed in the explosion... assuming Lot's family actually even existed.
Another biblical story which obviously wasn't true is the tower of Babel (Babylon). Many towers were built there, but one was left incomplete for about 200-250 years, and the story sprang up from that. However the tower construction was resumed and the tower was later finished.
Back to Sodom.... The family that escaped was Lot and his daughters. The story goes tha tLot's daughters got him drunk and seduced him in order to have children. In modern times there have been studies showing that no matter how drunk a person is they retain in the moment awreness of right and wrong, even if they have no memory of their actions the next day. I think if Lot is based a on actual person the story actually went along the lines of Lot demanded his daughters fring him wine and being obedient daughters they did. Lot got drunk and raped his daughters, and then blamed the victims by saying his daughters got him drunk and seduced him, even though it was he who demanded the wine in the first place. This not atypical alcoholic behavior and makes a lto mroe sense. As women were generally illiterate, their side of the story wasn't told.
Kind of like how Joshua was credited with destroyed cities which were destroyed over a span of more than 1000 years, as was shown via carbon dating. Biblical tales are made up and altered to try to promote the Jewish faith, customs, and/or god. At the time they thought, "Who would ever know?"
Who indeed?
I was going to say as likely a polluted water source, or bad animal husbandry, until I read this stella response!
Probably just ordinary sex, maybe some gay sex...people were almost as nasty & close-minded then as they are now.....
It may never have existed at all! The Bible is useless as a history document!
@maturin1919 Possibly, but it's fun to speculate, and every now and then genuine proof is indeed found.
@Petter ...fun for you maybe, but another person might bite into a story as the ‘gospel fact’ and pass it on, until we have a movement over one ‘man’s fun’ speculation!
@Freedompath Great. Imagine me as the founder of a new sect! The "Sod 'em and Gonorrhea" church.
@Petter I can...but do you still have the ‘where-with-all’ to pull it off?
@Freedompath At my age I worry that the slightest tension would indeed "pull it off".
@Petter and these are the ‘golden years!’ I wish I had appreciated the ‘tin years’more...as the ‘golden’ ones have lack their ‘pomp and circumstance!’
It's just a standard "You'll go blind if you keep doing that" morality tale. YHWH was a jerk. I'm not sure if the cities are even established to have existed; if they did, most likely they perished in warfare or due to changes in the desert weather patterns.
Archeologists have unearthed possible contenders.
The site, which is believed to date back between 3500 and 1540 BC, is marked by a large mound that may have once been two cities - lower and upper - where the rich and elite lived, according to Sky News. Researchers have found defensive walls 10m high and 5m thick, gates, towers, plazas and ramparts, as well as a 'Red Palace' in the upper city.
@Petter You lambast RT but accept Murdoch propoganda as truth?
@FrayedBear It's actually a clip from "The Independent" newspaper, one of the publications that has no "big-money-mogul" behind it.
I would no more trust Fox and Murdoch than I would Putin or Trump.
Even without knowledge of germs or hygiene, I think I'd be reluctant to fuck an animal. Although, there have been times I was desperate enough to consider it.
There have been many incidents reported in African newspapers of bestiality, the most common one involving, strangely, poultry.
Then there's the old joke about sheep. Remember, it doesn't have to be everyone committing bestiality.
HIV probably came from a man near the Ruwenzori mountains having sex with an Ape (alive or dead) and acquiring the virus. From then on it will transmit, especially in sex acts that cause lesions ot where skin is weak, as in women who have undergone female circumcision.
So is your question about the transfer of viral infections between humans and other animals through the vector of intercourse or is it about some religious dogma on what humans should be allowed to fuck according to the priests who have shown themselves willing to fuck anything that moves?
I actually watched a show where they think a meteorite hit the area where Sodom and Gomorrah was at. Not too far of a stretch that people would blame the meteorite on Sodoms sin much like sin was blamed for Hurricane Katrina
It's an excuse as good as any other.
There are lots of stories in the bible that were made up to explain events that
the ancients didn't have the science to make sense of.
Just like all other myths, it got embellished with each translation and retelling.
Just like every other story in every other "holy" book.
Sodom and Gomorrah were likely destroyed by earthquakes.
[bbc.co.uk]
Well that post stirred the shit amongst the buggers!
The only sin specifically described in the tale is inhospitality. The test was bow the strangers wkuld be treated. They were treated with disrespect and threats of rape. Keep in mind that rape is not about sexual desire.in rape, sex is a tool for exerting control and declaring power.
Nothing regarding animals other than human is mentioned or suggested. No illness or plague is mentioned either. So why speculate about any of that? Nine of it fits the tale. Nor, for that matter, is there anything other than the high salt content of the nearby tides to suggest that the tale has roots in an actual event to br "embellished."
g
Infection and mortality was certainly an issue in medieval Europe when the clergy where obviously not praying hard enough to stop pestilence and the people turned on them.
Makes perfect sense in an ecclesiocentric world.
Don’t know if any pandemic could’ve related to bestiality. Probably need the input of a virologist on that one.
HIV was quite likely initiated by bestiality with Apes, probably a gorilla, possibly dead.
@Petter Is that academically conclusive or an urban legend?
@Geoffrey51 When AIDS was explained to Ugandans in the 1970s, they said "Oh. You mean Slims?" (This is first hand. At the time, I was living in Uganda.)
The area of the Ruwenzori mountains, (Western Uganda and Eastern Congo) was traced to be the origin of the disease, and reckoned to have jumped from Gorillas to man.
Here's a link to HIV and gorillas.
[sciencedaily.com]
@Petter Thanks Petter. I know about the jump from many monkey/gorilla to human but the summary doesn’t refer to the cause being bestiality.
@Geoffrey51 That comes from my cultured Ugandan friends berating the behaviour of uneducated peasants in the Congo.
Most likely a morality tale to ward off rampant homosexuality. A practice that killed off Sparta.
I doubt that claim stands up to any scrutiny.
@brentan Oh but it does. Young boys were given to a mentor to train. Homosexuality was the norm in Sparta. You attacked with your right hand whilst defending the guy on your left with your shield. It was thought that you would be more loyal to someone you had had sex with than just another comrade
The trouble was that guys got too into gay sex and it became a problem for them to make babies with their wives. One trick was where the wife would dress as a young boy and get a room in the tavern. Hubby would go out drinking with his mates and then take a break. Fuck his wife doggie style then return to the table. Even those ploys grew stale though and Spartans went from a large force to an elite officer class. Eventually being beaten by the Thracians
@273kelvin I checked your statement out on Google and came up with counter-claims that heterosexual marriage and child-bearing was very much part of Spartan society. People interpret the claims according to their prejudices. One webpage giving an example of this is about Nixon's claims for the demise of ancient Greece and Sparta, among other ancient civilisations:
Is this theory based on any real evidence? Was someone writing stuff like this down back in the day or was it all based on speculation? Perhaps they were always going into battle and just ran out of men by attrition? When you consider one horny guy could probably impregnate several women a day the whole argument doesn't seem to hold much water...
@prometheus That would presuppose infidelity by the Spartan wives. A highly dishonorable act. They were an elite fighting force with very strict codes, similar to the samurai.
@273kelvin do you know for a fact they didn't have thrupels, polyamory, and orgies? Plus if the very survival of your clan is at stake rules can change. A bit of consensual impregnation Gilead style could easily become socially acceptable.
As we have been reminded by recent events in China, viruses can jump from animals to humans without the so-called depravity of a Sodom and Gomorrah. So while bestiality may provide a salacious tabloid headline, it need not be present for an epidemic to occur.
In any case, "God's displeasure" is always the stock answer for a natural disaster, the loss of a battle or the decline of a civilization. Unless of course the civilization was unknown to the authors of the holy books. I find it interesting how we never learned of "God's displeasure" with the Mayan civilization, which virtually disappeared centuries before the arrival of Europeans.
The virus passes due to close proximity over a lengthy period. ie. To a poultry farmer or seller/butcher. Think a cut on the Human's hand and poultry blood.
However, think tabloid press. Screaming headline, salacious subject and wow! Booming circulation!
This was God's displeasure with the chinese communist party! Lol
Bible’s Sodom and Gomorrah destroyed by an exploding asteroid, says archaeologists
NOVEMBER 22, 20182:31pm
Asteroid "air blast", natural gas explosion, war and pestilence.
There are various archeological camps. It's fun to add another suggestion!!!
It's an imaginative interpretation. Cities have always promoted many kinds of intercourse and been breeding grounds for disease and therefore population sinks.
An imaginative postulation designed to stir interest in things other than dating and politics.
I don't think old Jehovah liked cities. They seemed to just end up concentrating and encouraging crime, something like what happens in prisons. The thing about Sodom and Gomorrah is it is used as one of plenty of examples of sexual immorality that forgets all the other crimes in cities. Jehovah seemed to connect the sense of pride living in an 'advanced' setting (a city rather than tents in the desert) as the root of sin. I won't quote it but his attitude is well expressed in Exekiel chapter 16 and deals with a lot more than sex.
We can't have any of that sexual immorality going on however murdering those people that commit sexual immorality is OK.
I don't think this Jehovah character liked people in general all that much - only the sycophants.
I do not know. I can tell you this. Gorillas have lice. Humans have hair lice. Human crabs or pubic lice are direct descendants of gorilla lice. So we had to have some very close contact for that!
From where do you think AIDS originated? (the area of the Ruwenzori mountains.) Long before the world named it AIDS the people of Western Uganda and Eastern Congo had a name for it. "Slims".
@Gwendolyn2018 My "gutter theory" is much more interesting, just less likely!
@Gwendolyn2018 Very subjective. Its all in the eye.....never mind.
This would all be a far step in my opinion. It was a story. Who would have known about virus or germs to take a far fetched story and try to make it legitimate?
My point precisely. People did not know about micro-organisms. So to what would verbally transmitted legends, handed down from the bronze age, attribute such a pandemic other than to a god's wrath.
Was actually more of worshiping wrong god syphilis probably came from sheep, vaginas have spirochete similar to it, blame the shepards
Actually camels are the main carrier of syphilis, in the same way that horses carry tetanus, and it's a common disease amongst camel handlers in the middle east from being bitten.
@Cyklone in class it was noted that the spirochete in sheep is very similar to syphilis but different could have mutated into syphilis initially several thousand years ago, like the SARS and corona viruses today mutating from other animals . Not a recent mutation syphilis has been around a very long time
@Petter Pretty sure that's how virgin birth came about. Mary was only about 13 or 14 at the time. No mom , I didn't have sex with Joseph it was the Holy Spirit that impregnated me.
@abyers1970 According to Roman Catholic dogma, Mary's mother also had a virgin birth, in order for Jesus to be born of a woman without original sin.
The birth of Mary's mother is celebrated on December 8th, the feast of the immaculate conception. So it's a case of "like mother, like daighter". ..... and Jesus's father is also his grandfather, according to their dogma!!
@Petter I did not know that about Mary’s mother. I’m sure that recollection is about as accurate as the Crown of thorns in Notre Dame cathedral actually being the one that Jesus wore.
@abyers1970 It was part of the bullshit fed to me as a ten year old in mandatory catechism class during primary school. In secondary school it was optional, meaning I opted OUT!!
@Gwendolyn2018 Maybe she was!!
@Gwendolyn2018 Furthermore, Jesus was a trouble maker.
Consider - she went into a temple where people were legitimately going about their money lending business and upset all the tables!
Only an obstreperous woman would do such a thing!!
@Gwendolyn2018 But haven't you ever turned the tables on someone, or at least wished to do so?
@Gwendolyn2018 or
It’s very possible. There is still bestiality today when it is illegal in a modern society. Just imagine what went on in an uncivilized society but the main “sin” according to the Bible was homosexuality. When the two male angels came to rescue Lot in Sodom . Many men surrounded Lots house and wanted him to give the two angels up so they may have sex with them. This is according to the Bible. Not my words but the bibles
Really, sex with an angel? That would be my last choice. I'd go downstairs given the choice.
@rogueflyer I was a Christian for 30 years so I know the story well
Answers In Genesis makes a convincing argument that the main sin was rape. Homosexuality was just a byproduct of their proclivity for sexual violence. [answersingenesis.org]
The sin is widely interpreted by christians as being homosexuality but in fsct the sin wasn't the gender of the angels, who may not even have had their genders mentioned. Why do we assume they were male? No, the sin was treating strangers badly, being inhospitable.
Keeping in mind of course that we are analyzing a work of fiction.
g
@genessa To my knowledge there were never any female angels in the Bible. I could be wrong but I don’t remember any
@abyers1970 but these were not necessarily named angels. they could have come in any guise -- they could have been in drag there is also no mention of the townspeople's KNOWING what gender the strangers were. the point is, everyone has made an awful lot of assumptions, and most of them fit a preexisting agenda. all this is moot since it's just a story, but still.
g
@genessa Its pretty obvious who the townspeople thought they were. I copied this from Genesis and they clearly state men which goes along with the idea that homosexuality was the sin God destroyed Sodom for which is made up anyway so it doesn't matter
3 But he insisted so strongly that they did go with him and entered his house. He prepared a meal for them, baking bread without yeast, and they ate. 4 Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom—both young and old—surrounded the house. 5 They called to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them.”
Interesting that Lot was saved from destruction yet he offered up his daughters to the men instead of the angel.
@abyers1970 that is one hell of a translation. i hope you realize it is not close to the original hebrew. ה וַיִּקְרְאוּ אֶל-לוֹט וַיֹּאמְרוּ לוֹ, אַיֵּה הָאֲנָשִׁים אֲשֶׁר-בָּאוּ אֵלֶיךָ הַלָּיְלָה; הוֹצִיאֵם אֵלֵינוּ, וְנֵדְעָה אֹתָם. 5 And they called unto Lot, and said unto him: 'Where are the men that came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them.' okay it says men. but know can have many meanings.
g
How could they use science then as an explanation even to God?
They didn't. They blamed a mythical figure.