Agnostic.com
23 4

Why do we desire and seek a romantic, intimate relationship with the opposite sex full well knowing it will evolve into causing heartache for one and/or both??

SerengetiLion 3 Aug 19
Share
You must be a member of this group before commenting. Join Group

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

23 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

6

Because I'm stupid? Is this a quiz? I think l nailed it.

Sticks48 Level 9 Aug 19, 2019
4

Love the ride and it hurts at most only to the degree it was worth getting into. I think our lives have emotional conservation almost as reliably as thermodynamics.

Buttercup Level 8 Aug 19, 2019
3

Bob Marley said - everyone is going to hurt you.
You need to figure out who is worth suffering for.

Haemish1 Level 8 Aug 19, 2019
3

If that's all one has had then it is natural to assume that is all there is. It is not. One great relationship can change your whole worldview.

JackPedigo Level 9 Aug 19, 2019
3

There's two sides to the relationship coin.

You assume that "it will evolve into causing heartache" and suffering.

Do you mean you've never had an ecstatic and ultra-pleasurable relationship?

Sad. That's the other side of the coin.

That's why people keep seeing intimate relationships.

Robecology Level 9 Aug 19, 2019

First off, I never assume anything. And I have had
A few relationships that make one say, "life is great" but eventually things change and the feeling isn't so great.

You're being argumentative.

Read your original comment.

You ARE assuming;

this comment - "full well knowing it will evolve into causing heartache for one and/or both??" is an assumption.

I was trying to make you see the positive possibilities... You just want to debate.

Have a good life.

2

I pondered that after a heart break earlier this year. At one point I wished I had never met him. Now, I'm grateful I did even though I suffered because it didn't work out. The pain was gut wrenching. I still feel sadness when I think of him, but I'm not sobbing and feeling like I'm breaking. I think I'll always feel something for him. He was my first and only heartbreak...yes, at 49 years old. The crazy thing is he didn't do anything wrong. I wanted something more serious. He didn't.

I have fond memories...

Cabsmom Level 8 Aug 19, 2019

@arizonajerry69 your responses rarely if ever have anything to do with my comment. I didn't say anything about sex. Yes, we had sex. That wasn't the issue between us. I am not interested in the swinging lifestyle...but don't care if others like it. I don't care about your evaluation system.

2

I'm 4-2. The 4 is worth trying for again...

1

I don’t know that the natural result of love is heartache. I don’t see a linear pattern from love to heartbreak. I look at it more like a mixture, or an interconnection of both love and pain. I also do not think that love is the reason for pain. I think vulnerability is the reason for pain, and love is a catalyst for the kind of openness and vulnerability which makes us susceptible to hurt.

911clemen Level 3 Aug 25, 2019

Only those open to risk (being hurt) can step up. What doesn't kill us does make us stronger. It also makes us eligible for happiness.
I lift my glass to the brave...(and I try to be one of them!)🙋🖖💙

1

Because we are wired to do so, humans are meant to have a partner/ partners and live in a social group. We thrive in one and fall into depression when alone to much. We hope to find the right one that will not end in heartache. To give and receive love is our only reason for being.

1

That’s a rather pessimistic view on relationships. True, there is no guarantee that things won’t end in heartache but there’s no guarantee that it won’t be the best thing to have ever happened to you till death do you part either. Take the risk, expect the worst ‘could’ happen but cherish the good times. I was divorced after 15 years of marriage, then widowed to the love of a lifetime and now in a beautiful amazing relationship. I know about taking risks in love and regret nothing.

Hazydays Level 7 Aug 20, 2019
1

Been married 36 years this month. We aren't perfect, the marriage isn't perfect, but we have each other's back. Live in the present, and expect the unexpected. It isn't always easy, but those who want to can work through the hard times.

EdEarl Level 8 Aug 19, 2019
1

My sister and her husband have currently been married for 36 years. A good relationship can happen.

You don't know the heartaches each of them have went through. So how about you?

@SerengetiLion I was married for over 25 years, I've been divorced for about 10. For my sister and her husband their biggest heartache is that their adult son will not outlive them. He has a genetic condition that used to kill children. It still does, it just kills them more slowly. In their marriage I know they have had rough spots but they worked through it. My marriage ended about 5 or 10 years before we actually got a divorce.

1

Because life is a mixture of the good and the bad, sometimes the sweetest things involve heartbreak and disappointment, and if you're wise enough to learn from your experiences you realize that you're stronger than you think.

bleurowz Level 8 Aug 19, 2019
0

I don't know that it will end in heartbreak... But it takes time and effort to find someone that's right for you and them.. If you don't take the risk, you don't get the rewards... And you end up all alone...

0

Got me?

Davekp Level 8 Aug 20, 2019
0
  1. There are different kinds of relations - shallow, short term, long term, matured, deep and profound.
  2. A profound and deep relationship is matured over a long term that goes through various life stages and experiences. It includes failures, successes, hard times, good times, trials, celebrations, happiness, grief, heartache, gratitude etc. A good tested relationship sees it all.

Try to observe an elderly couple over '70s or '80s sitting in a park or walking together. Try to note the tenderness, respect and gratitude they have towards each other in their togetherness. It can suggest more than one of these:

  1. We have been through a lot together
  2. You stood by me through difficult times
  3. You were a good father to our children
  4. You were a good mother to our children
  5. You were there when I needed you
  6. We had such happy times together

A heartache is the least of the problems in a relationship. You have to know what your relationship is based on. That is what you want to understand and be sure of. Else a heartache must be worth immediate happiness right there.... lol

St-Sinner Level 9 Aug 20, 2019
0

well first of all not all people do: there are bisexuals and pansexuals and homosexuals. And because we are social creatures and thus mentally healthy people (excluding antisocial people) seek bonds and social unions with other humans. And not all relationships lead to heartache as not all relationships turn serious or lead to love. So casual dating won't lead to heartache.

@arizonajerry69 Cure all regarding heart ache you mean? Or literally cures all? Because I have known terminally ill people that are dead that would disagree with the sex cures all line. >.>

0

Take the ride ...... With all the thrills and.disappointments .

GEGR Level 7 Aug 19, 2019
0

It doesn't have to evolve that way

It certainly "shouldn't" evolve that way but it does and I understand the reasoning of why.

0

What is the situation you are referring to? What I mean is, why are you so sure the relationship is going to end (and end in heartbreak...because some just fizzle and both parties agree to part as friends)?

Ok, I don't mean "end" in heartache but when it ends there was headache sometime during.

0

No bio or photo yet. Is it male or female?

mischl Level 8 Aug 19, 2019

@LetzGetReal Yes, that is certainly an option. However, some of us are reluctant to answer and/or interact with such members.

@arizonajerry69 When there's no bio information and no photo, I immediately suspect a troll of some kind.

0

I don't think we ever know where a relationship will go, but our expectations certainly help steer it. And even a dysfunctional relationship can be better than being alone all the time.

BitFlipper Level 8 Aug 19, 2019

@LetzGetReal as I agree too

0

Intimacy is generally referred to as physical intimacy.

Emotional closeness is not generally referred to as intimacy. You can have an emotional bond, closeness.

We often mix it together to make it more difficult than it needs to be. You can have one without the other. Both are mutually exclusive.

St-Sinner Level 9 Aug 19, 2019

Intimacy can be viewed as our experience of mutual closeness with another person or persons. It includes trust, vulnerability, emotional risk taking, reciprocity, sharing and caring, self-disclosure, liking and loving. We can have intimate relationships with dear friends with whom we do not engage in sexual activity. I use this model in my sex ed work. [uua.org]

@UUNJ It can be viewed? Yes, it can be viewed by different people many different ways. But that is not the common understanding.

There is a variety of definitions including academic and psychological definitions. To me, what you wrote is emotional closeness to most common folks, not even love. Common people understand simple terms. They are not academic and they don't go reading books to understand what intimacy is. Intimacy to most folks is physical intimacy - not all those complex things. All other things are emotional connections.

Convoluted things are good materials for memes and quotes but not for common and day to day life. It needs to be simple and easy to understand.

"We went to dinner, had nice laughs, a great chat and we went to my room and got intimate last night".... this can exclude everything you mentioned above. It can be just wanting a good time, lust but needs no caring or loving. The world does not work that way. There are many things in life that are transnational including intimacy.

You women folks like to make things emotional. You need to have love everywhere.

@St-Sinner You say tomato, I say tomato. This model has been used for 20 years by sex educators teaching everyone from little kids to older adults, and it doesn’t seem to confuse anyone. I could argue that more people say “having sex” or “making love” than “getting intimate.”

@UUNJ

There you go. It is in the books. That definition does not work in the real world. Most bookish things do not work for common people. Commonly, intimacy is physical intimacy, not so many other things. May be in the elite, academic world but not to most people. It confuses people. You may mean intimacy to include all those things, others may not. Try saying "I feel intimate with you" sometime to a man and see what reaction you will get. Your proof is right there. Most likely you will only get one reaction. Academic discussion is one thing, the real world is another. It is good enough for books greeting cards, memes to feel or make feel nice and smoochie.

@St-Sinner I counsel, interact with,
and date “common people.” I’m not stuck in an ivory academic tower. Being in an intimate relationship doesn’t require the language you refer to. Someone who feels intimate with someone might feel more able to say, “I want to fuck you” or “Let’s make love.” Indeed, some people might only feel saying those phrases once they trust someone enough to be vulnerable. This has become a silly semantics digression from the original post.

@UUNJ
It is one definition and it is the one that you prefer. It is not mine and of many people I know.

This is the most common definition of intimacy from the dictionary..."an intimate act, especially sexual intercourse."

Synonyms...... sexual relations, sexual intercourse, sex, intercourse, lovemaking, act of love, carnal knowledge, sexual congress, congress; formalcoition, coitus, copulation.

It is not just about semantics because confusing young kids with wrong connotations can have consequences. Consider this scenario....

A teacher teaches kids that intimacy includes.... trust, vulnerability, emotional risk taking, reciprocity, sharing and caring, self-disclosure, liking and loving.

So a girl student comes home one day and tells Mom.... "Mom, I feel very intimate about John."

Now, it will be parents' and others' responsibility to correct the crap taught by teachers. Young minds are not mature enough to understand these complex definitions from classrooms about plain and simple things of life.

@St-Sinner You do you.

@St-Sinner It sounds like you are projecting... just because intimacy confuses you doesn't mean it confuses others.... I mean religions that prioritize emotional intimacy over physical intimacy teach about it... for example catholic schools we were taught about intimacy in the emotional sense cause obviously physical intimacy was not allowed until marriage... and this was in high school.... are you telling me that the avg human is dumber than a catholic high schooler?? >.>

@LetzGetReal
You said many men are emotional. That does not mean men in general. I was saying women in general are more emotional than men. Is it not a true statement?

All these are true statements - generally speaking..

  1. Women like cuddling more than men do
  2. Men are physically stronger than women are
  3. Women are more emotionally expressive than men are
  4. Women cry more than men do

These statements are not sexist. These are not my opinions. These are observations based on studies that say... "Empirical evidence suggests that girls are socialized to be emotional, non-aggressive, nurturing, and obedient, whereas boys are socialized to be unemotional, aggressive, achievement oriented, and self-reliant.".

If I were to express my opinion, it would be this... Most women like men to pay their restaurant bills.

@demifeministgal
I do not know how dumb Catholics are because I never was one. But I have held a belief that religious people are generally dumber than pragmatic people. But I can say Catholics are dumb for one reason.... they call the Pope the "Holy See" when he shits and farts just like all others.

The complex definition of intimacy does not confuse many according to you. I am saying it confuses many. Both are true statements.

@St-Sinner Those are stereotypes, not facts. If they were facts, you’d present research, which you won’t because you don’t appreciate academics. #mansplaining

@UUNJ I respect academic work but we often overdo it in real life. I was called over-educated for a long time. I know the fallacy of applying academic things in common life. It does not work.

Try to do a random short survey on what people understand by this sentence.... "I was intimate with her". You will know quickly that people do not go by the bookish definition in real life.

I do not present research because this is not a scholarly article or a thesis. That is the problem of academic orientation. A lot of things happen in life without citations, references, research. Snap out of it. This is a social platform. We are discussing points of view.

@St-Sinner You missed my point, which was that religious teens are somehow smarter than avg person. Also, aggression and anger ARE ALSO EMOTIONS. And if men tend to be more aggressive and angry, they are also quite emotional beings too. You just stigmatize some emotions that you consider girly over others, that is all.

@arizonajerry69
Yes, I agree. Distant last. We confuse intimacy with a lot of other words. Why isn't everybody like you?

Write Comment

Recent Visitors 78

Photos 163 More

Posted by AtheistPeace666Hello I'm a single Canuck looking for my special lady Canuck.

Posted by KhaCRYou ever feel like you found the perfect sexual partner then he turns out to be a complete 💩bag and you can’t find the satisfaction in other encounters?

Posted by EntheogenFanI have a story to tell.

Posted by EntheogenFanI have a story to tell.

Posted by KateOahuYes, I agree that the reverse is also true.

Posted by JolantaThis is what women have to put up with and then they want to be intimate while we are still angry because they will not do their share of housework.

Posted by JolantaDucky, Snookums....

Posted by SorchaThis is a guy I was talking to from okcupid. He is totally new to online dating and it shows.

Posted by JolantaThat’s Amore. Some women are just far too shallow.

Posted by JolantaSomething for real intimacy perhaps.

Posted by Green_Soldier71Has anyone here had any experience with (or known someone who has/had) a SEXLESS MARRIAGE/RELATIONSHIP or a FRIGID PARTNER?

Posted by EyesThatSmileNakedness.

Posted by LetzGetRealMy family has often commented how I should become a "cougar"... as I look pretty good at my age and have a younger mindset than some of my peers, I guess this is there rationale?

Posted by Ann-1980The 4 types of Intimacy to feel sufficient, satisfied & healing in a love relationship.

Posted by Philip21over the top thinking? [agnostic.com]

Posted by DavidRussettI have been a widower for 2 years. I am very lonely. I am really looking for a relationship wth someone compatible with me.

  • Top tags#relationship #sex #intimacy #video #friends #religious #hope #religion #world #god #children #wife #marriage #book #kids #advice #death #reason #agnostic #beliefs #Atheist #hell #money #society #movies #fear #hello #Present #parents #belief #loves #Song #community #lonely #books #divorce #culture #humans #dogs #sleep #chemistry #Christian #college #soul #animals #sexy #philosophy #holiday #DonaldTrump #sexuality ...

    Members 1,849Top

    Moderator